The Quranic text, through being a divine message, formed a messaging structure according to communication rules so it talked and contacted the other and got a great deal of study and analysis. So scientists and researchers, veterans and contemporary,
studied all the phenomena in this valuable book.
The more we study the Quranic text from different side, the more uncovered faces we find. For example, the phenomenon of communication was opened to the situations of people and everything related to their permanent renewal and development, taking persuasion in a way to attract people towards Islam.
The Quran came to underscore his relationship with the Creator and itself and other people. It's a message addressed to all humanity, depends in which to address the mind in the process of persuasion, offering a living language suitable for all ages, has an effective role in persuading others, essentially forwarded to influence the views of the addressee, swaying the mind according to a specific linguistic strategy based on the employment of language within renewed structure linked ideologue and the receiver within a social and psychological context with the purpose of influencing the recipient.
The Quranic Text tells stories for facing reality and does not decide the truth, but to change void, which is the supreme goal of communication where speaker tries to effect the other and makes him convinced with the new offer and gets the answer to influence the other new party, therefore forces the argument relying on stories of the prophets and messengers who were sent to previous nations. Hence the importance of research rises as one of the scientific subjects that connects to the clearest book in the world, which is Quran. The connection is elevated to be informed of the most important linguistic science as a whole . As well as investigating the phenomena in the Quran and trying to detect underneath by evidence based on modern scientific theories, you are searching through a science of foundations and different control rules all through Quran. I have chosen Informative & Communicative Tenors in the story of Meriam as a subject of study because it's a new research in Contemporary Arab Studies in theoretical part and limitations of empirical studies in the field of Quran analysis.
This textual study aims at revealing the effectiveness of
argumentation in structuring the poetic text. The study discusses two
basic dimensions in this regard: first, the theoretical dimension that will
identify the concept of argumentation in Ar
istotle's poetics, Arabic
lexicon and the traditional Arabic Rhetorical discourse. This dimension
will also discuss the different views given by argumentation scholars in
modern poetics. Finally, it will describe the relationship between
argumentation and culture, especially in cultural studies.
The second dimension is the practical one in which Al – Ra'i Al-
Numairi's (Daliah) will be taken as a model because of being a political
text. This text is made up of four paratexts: distance and discrepancies of
events, the extra-ordinary adventure and the consequences of the
unknown the revolutionary self and the worrying nighttime, and the
blaming female and the rebellions male.
All these paratexts together provide clues about argumentative
writing that clarifies the confusion in the relationship between Al – Ra'i
Al - Numairi who represents the oppressed and the Ommayad authority
represented by the caliph Abdul Malik Bin Marwan.
This study aims to reveal the Argumentative Dimension and
mechanism of its formation in the poetic text and deliberative about
the pragmatics laws that govern the poet's awareness and affect its
Social ،as well as showing the impact of Psychologic
al ،culture
and cultural context to the argument text may see beginning a way
from any effort argumentative differentiated in the descriptive
pictorial and if its variety orbital guidance clirsc loses attributes of
which was strongly borne when the ،the collective consciousness
who had an idea and his art mentors of this awareness ،old poet
even if they tried to break free from the cullet.
This research fox on the mechanisms of argumentative inference
to the poetry of Early Islamic era , and we don't mean of inference
the strict logical one , but the pragmatic inference which
fucuses on language in the context of use and in the soci
al and
cultural context . And this study isn't restricted on political dialectic
poetries , so that how many poetries exudes self disappear behind it
deep argumentative dimension .
The research presents is an attempt to study the Techniques and tactics of speech
which convince the receiver of its notions and ideas so that he takes them for granted then
it applies them to a historical text which is "the speech of Abullah Ibn Y
ehia, Head of
Ibadyyeh when ruling Yemen". the research also attempts to make a compromise clarifying
both sides of the saying : the theoretical and the practical alongside the tacticse utilized in
persuasion.
The orator\ speaker begins with emotional usages emanated from tribal thoughts that
both the receiver and the sender embrace taking them from Islamic law principles which
evoke fear in the Muslim receiver as they are ready-made arguments. Then they display
emotional mental ones that refrain from grabbing the attention of the receiver but make
him aware of the disappearance of classes' differences with the sender. This happens in
instructional strategies that enabled him to have an impact upon the receiver knowing his
intentions and aim via some data of pragmatic linguistics which rely on argumentation,
verbal acts and subtle expressionistic styles deployed in this same context.
This pragmatic might be the best when it comes to studying his speech, analyzing it,
then unraveling its tools of persuasion taking into account that is a science that studies
language in context.
Studies and research about rhetoric have varied concerning the definition of rhetoric,
but most of them look at rhetoric from on side only. Rhetoric was classified as being a kind
of research concerned with the art of persuasion in its techniques,
means and components.
But it is certain that the political and social conditions of the greak life, led these
philosophical studies and linguistic research especially, rhetoric. This made Aristotle
divide rhetoric into three sections.
The research delt with two main titles, the first one was Rhetoric according to
Aristotle. It combines between mans ability to speak and express on one hand becavse man
is a speaker and expressor who naturally looks for persuasion. In his speech, he tries to
convince as many people as possible. To do this, he uses many instinctive means. Aristotle
was concerned with rhetoric due to its mental and psychological sides.
He tried to find a kind of balance between the means of persuasion and means of
influence. He made convincing help infuencing. He diffentiated between kinds of proofs,
the made proofs and the non made proofs. The other ones were the base of the rhetoric
structure for Aristotle. The argumentative linguistic text is different from other texts that it
builds an interactive structure based on some means that aim to persuade and affect the
recipient.
The purpuse of the speech whatever its type is the inflence so the speaker tries so hard to
produse linguistic words that direct the reciever towards a specific action.The importance
of the argumintation theory lies in the depending on the speech t
echniques which the
sender use in the speech .And which make his speech acceptable to the reciever.The
argumentation theory started in the fields of Linguistics ,Logic ,Anthropology…etc and
different other sciences.It becomes a complete theory after Perlman's researches which the
scientists work on.All the analytists and researchers get benefit from in the communication
and connecting theory.Relying on the speaker's techniques in achieving a successful
connecting that leags to a real communication is the purpose of argumenation theory which
is a still growing.And which considers the speech act theory as a scientific background.
