This research addresses an old and new controversy: the Quranic
context versus occasions of revelations: which of them is stronger
semantically for preference if it proves impossible to reconcile them
within one apparent context. What is old in th
is research is the
importance of context for semantic preference in terms of deciding what
is meant by the Quranic text as appears from the context, and in terms of
clarifying and specifying generalizations, in addition to context being the
meaning that links words and Ayat (verses) together.
This research deals with the role of the context in the rotation between the actual
forms of past, present and future, time is often divided into past, present and future
formulas, the research examines the contexts that leads the original time fro
m its position
to another time that does not indicate it in the first place that shows that there is a
difference between the temporal time and the grammatical, the research shows that the
formula of the present verb is different from that of the past because of the existence of a
presumption function and repent formula of the past about the present and future, which
does not indicate by the origin of the past but the present time and future, so the context
determines the grammar time.
This research fox on the mechanisms of argumentative inference
to the poetry of Early Islamic era , and we don't mean of inference
the strict logical one , but the pragmatic inference which
fucuses on language in the context of use and in the soci
al and
cultural context . And this study isn't restricted on political dialectic
poetries , so that how many poetries exudes self disappear behind it
deep argumentative dimension .
