Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The concept of "spectrum" in Jacques Derrida's philosophy of exclusion and evocation

مفهوم "الطيف" في فلسفة جاك دريدا بين الإقصاء و الاستحضار

1322   2   35   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2018
  fields Philosphy
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

This research is an interpretive and critical approach to one of Jacques Derrida's theories of deconstructive philosophy, the term "spectrum", which focuses first on trying to define and clarify the meanings that can be contained within Derrida's texts, and then sheds light on its location and importance for the School of Methodological Practice , And in a third stage, this paper presents an illustration of Derrida's divergence regarding the concept of the spectrum that this argument indicates between exclusion and retention and how Derrida's position can be interpreted in this regard. Finally, this research presents a critical approach to the functional role of Derrida's philosophy .

References used
دريدا، جاك. أطياف ماركس. ترجمة: منذر عياشي، ط 2، مركز الإنماء الحضاري، حلب, 2006
دريدا، جاك. صيدلية أفلاطون. ترجمة: كاظم جهاد، دار الجنوب، تونس، 1998
rate research

Read More

The principle of causality is considered one of the most important philosophical and scientific principles that played a seminal role in developing scientific and epistemic research. This started with the commencement of philosophical thought. Sinc e then the early philosophers attempted to look for the first causes that formed the universe and the real reasons that led to the phenomena and incidents happeningin it , Hence, the principle of causality helped to present a general comprehensive viewpoint about the universe. This viewpoint says that nature always undergoes fixed rules, phenomena becomes regular according to a certain system and that the hierarchy of these phenomena is linked with systems that have laws and certain causal liaisons . With the advancement of science and knowledge, it has become clear to scientists and thinkers that mind does not conclude laws save through a number of principles, one of which is the principle of causality. Thus, scientific experiment shows that phenomena are related to each other as the causesare related to the effects. This is explained through the principle of causality by which it is possible to derive conclusions of the general laws that rule the relationships between correlated phenomena , As a result of the causal theory, many philosophical and scientific concepts that are strongly related to the principle of causality emerged. Such concepts were that of necessity, inevitability and indeterminism which in its turn led to the emergence of many philosophical doctrines and scientific movements that contributed greatly to the scientific and epistemic sphere through the theories and problematic questions they posed and probed.
This research tries to examine the concept of self within the framework of modern philosophy and contemporary philosophy, in an attempt to highlight the role of this concept in the formation of most of the philosophical doctrines from the Greek era to the contemporary philosophy, through modern philosophy. In this research, we will attempt to study the formation of this concept in the framework of modern and contemporary philosophy, to show the philosophers' interest in this concept and the extent to which the concept is linked to the clarify their own philosophy. Therefore, the research attempts to provide a follow-up reading of the concept of self in a comparative historical context, in which we demonstrate that this concept is still alive in contemporary philosophy, albeit with different names, such as reason, mind or feeling. We will conclude from this the importance of the concept of self in the philosophical context, which still occupies an important space in the thinking of modern and contemporary philosophers. Here we will try to ask several questions, including what is the dualism of the soul and body. How can the soul be a logical synthesis, an emanated mind, or a subjective feeling? In this research, we will try to answer these questions and other questions that will appear in the context of the research.
This research attempts at focusing on the sing concept by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida and how he tried to present a different critical reading of this concept, busy answering the question and looking for new horizons of this critical rea ding that gose beyond the structural closure. this will be through a reading strategy that enables us to open up to the text and its multiplicities. So this research firstly introduces the concept as done by Derrida then proceeds to discuss the role of reader being one deadly strategy in creating or producing the sing, being one product of the text, and his ability to recall the memory. All of this is to clarify the distance among texts which the textual horizon creates, since its role dose not have to do only with the strength of sing as in difference but also it contains a structural motive.The sign is created once the effect and the one who is put away are traced down and thus creates enterainment among texts. Consequently, reading becomes an aesthetic experience that reconstructs the text anew till we get in this research to accumulative results in a conclusion that presents some of the ideas we ended up with when tacking this issue.
Feuerbach tried to make the power of love a kind of power that cannot be matched with any other power as love defeats all his opponents even if God is one of them. Love is always victorious. That's what made the concept of love in Feuerbach’s ideas a distinguished and unprecedented concept comparing to all concepts handled by those philosophers before him. This kind of love dominates the body and soul together and it is inseparable from our body, may not live outside our soul, it is the basis of the body and the essence of the spirit. Feuerbach wanted to make love a link between a mankind and another so there is no love if one existence and the other is absent. Feuerbach doesn’t limit himself at this point but goes on to ignore the existence of human being without being in love or loved by other person. That who does not love does not exist, even religion has neither benefit nor importance if it is not based on love because love is the reason and core in other words love is the reason behind the existence of religion.
Deconstruction tries to disrupt the transcendental signification and its domination on the other implications by introducing a new concept: the concept of free play of the marque. This concept is based on the philosophy of the otherness and differe nce. Derrida never stooped to remind that the difference is not a concept or an idea or a term. We see the difference as Law, a Law of reading and writing. But it's also the Law of the Other and the different. It reflectsa philosophy of otherness that is rooted in the writings of Derrida. Derrida expressed this Law by a formulation that reduces deconstruction as a philosophy and as a method: tout autre est tout autre, a sentence that says the identity and the otherness together. It says the identity, and says the other, each other, the other in his irreducible plurality, the other "is" different and we cannot tell his identity. Peerless formulation of the Law that says the impossible.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا