This research aims to study the play of " The adventure of Al –Mamlouk Gabers head " according to the theory of verbal verb . This theory which cares to study the meaning that considers it the use . There are clauses if you speak them ,they don’t giv
e just word ,but they give actions at the same time ,and this what we are going to concentrate on in analyzing Saad ALah Wanous play .
In this play I tried to study it as possible as I could according to this theory and dividing the verbs in it according to their indicative fields .
This research deals with the relationship between the meaning and the linguistic
rank. It starts talking about the idiom of the linguistic standing of a word in a sentence
according to the ancient and modern scholars. It also includes the role of t
he linguistic
standing in declaring the meaning and the relation of the linguistic sign in this concern.
The linguistic rank is a part in a group called evidences, and it is two kinds: the fixed
standingin which the words stand in a series that each one leads to the other. So the
antecedent refers to the subsequent and the second word completes the meaning of the first
one. And the flexible rank in which the word is characterized with flexibility of the
linguistic standing which gives it semantic function or necessity of grammatical cause in
exceeding the position. The research shows the relationship between the linguistic standing
and the meaning where there is an intimate relation between them, and the whole context is
the main base in the sentence order. To clarify this, the research analyses group of
quotations. The research also shows the meaningful worth to change the final part the word
and the intimate relation by showing the different meanings of the expression and the
connection of this withsyntactic guidance and the linguistic rank and with return of the
linguistic guidance to many reasons.
ربط الدارسون العرب من فلاسفة وأصوليين و لغويين و بلاغيين بين المعنى
و الصورة الذهنية، فقد رأوا أن المعنى هو الصورة الذهنية التي وضعت بإزائها
الألفاظ و قد كان لابد لفهم مسألة المعنى من أن تُدرس الصورة الذهنية و تُظهر علاقتها بإدراك الواقع الخارجي، و
صلتها باللغة المعبرة عن هذه الصورة، و في هذا البحث محاولة لفهم الصورة الذهنية لدى الدارسين العرب القدماء، و كان لابد للوصول إلى هذا الفهم من إطلالة سريعة على مفهوم الصورة الذهنية لدى الغربيين لتتضح صورتها، و تُفهم في تصورها لدى العرب، و لم يحاول البحث المقارنة بين المفهومين بقدر ما حاول إعطاء تصور كل من الفريقين لهذه المسألة.
This research tries to address the problem of Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb Types of Rhetorics
according to Al-Jahiz and Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb
accusing Abi Othman Al-Jahiz of not giving rhetorics what it is worth, and of not
studying it thoroughfully. Ibn Wahab
claimed completing what is missed through his
detailed study of the types of rhetorics, which are, to a large extent, similar to the types of
rhetorics according to Abi Othman.The later referred to the importance of the relation
between pronunciation, meaning and the necessity of the accordance between the two. In
addition, meaning is prior to pronunciation because it depends upon thought and
contemplation. He describes the types of rhetorics in a pyramidal sequential through levels
that stem-- and result-- from each other.
Similarly, Ibn wahab considers that the types of rhetorics result from each other.
These types, according to critics, are a process of a birth of these forms.
Despite the big similarity of the types of rhetorics according to both Ibn Wahab Al-
Kateb and Abi Othman Al-Jahiz, the first was not only a transcriber, but also he added and
clarified in certain areas. He exclusively talked about writers and classified them in one of
five: transcript writer, pronunciation writer, contract writer, judgment writer and
management writer. He also mentioned the most important features that a transcript writer
must have and divided writers into three levels. He extended in talking about the types of
handwriting and the forms of pens. These issues were dropped by Al-Jahiz when talking
about the types of rhetorics.
Meaning precision and fulfillment has been the sole aim of any researcher in
language, and since meaning is the outcome of grammatical structure in one specific
context, that researcher must not prefer one to the other
In other words, all of the g
rammatical aspects fall in the trap of one controversial
relation when it comes to meaning interpretation
Therefore, I have tackled the concept of ' situation context ' in my research and the
related terminologies and its impact in the field of language , the impact of the religious
factor in attracting the old scientists to the significance of grammatical from and context,
the outcome of both and to what extent those scientists have relied upon them when
interpreting Qur'anic text, lines of poetry only to figure out of them some new rules.
This research attempts at focusing on the sing concept by the French philosopher
Jacques Derrida and how he tried to present a different critical reading of this concept,
busy answering the question and looking for new horizons of this critical rea
ding that gose
beyond the structural closure. this will be through a reading strategy that enables us to open
up to the text and its multiplicities. So this research firstly introduces the concept as done
by Derrida then proceeds to discuss the role of reader being one deadly strategy in creating
or producing the sing, being one product of the text, and his ability to recall the memory.
All of this is to clarify the distance among texts which the textual horizon creates, since its
role dose not have to do only with the strength of sing as in difference but also it contains a
structural motive.The sign is created once the effect and the one who is put away are traced
down and thus creates enterainment among texts. Consequently, reading becomes an
aesthetic experience that reconstructs the text anew till we get in this research to
accumulative results in a conclusion that presents some of the ideas we ended up with
when tacking this issue.