In this research I'm going to expose Averroes maturity conception of legal movement to occur in the world and among the assets ; as long as the assets are composed of material and form , the movement depends on the union between material and form unt
il you get to the process of trans formation of the power in herent in the material by the action in the form .
And here comes the role of the actor which moves the material toward the union with form through movement , so the movement also serves as a process of the dialectic between the material and form that consist the nature of the assets in the world , and thus show the the movement it is bringing out of material to the form by the dialectic of power and action by becoming kinetic between assets
Thus , the conception of movement to Averroes highlights the important of form power and act as essential elements for the occurrence in existence . He stressed the vole of each element in the movement as well as the movement needs an actor and moving thing which are (material ,form, actor).
The paper Sheds light on one of the most important problems among the whole problems
that we find in the history of philosophy, namely, the problem of the relationship between wisdom
and Sharia law, trying to disclose the nature of the relationship
between wisdom and law in order to
detect intellectual conflicts or issues that the philosophers tried to detect the pivotal and key points
between wisdom and Sharia law, and philosophy and religion, through the general cultural state
prevailing in the Arab society during the Islamic middle ages. In addition, we will try to clarify the
theoretical and methodological foundations of the problem of reconciling and highlight the
ideological goals that drove the philosophers to reconcile between wisdom and Sharia.
This research tries to examine the concept of self within the framework of modern
philosophy and contemporary philosophy, in an attempt to highlight the role of this
concept in the formation of most of the philosophical doctrines from the Greek era
to the
contemporary philosophy, through modern philosophy.
In this research, we will attempt to study the formation of this concept in the
framework of modern and contemporary philosophy, to show the philosophers' interest in
this concept and the extent to which the concept is linked to the clarify their own
philosophy. Therefore, the research attempts to provide a follow-up reading of the concept
of self in a comparative historical context, in which we demonstrate that this concept is still
alive in contemporary philosophy, albeit with different names, such as reason, mind or
feeling.
We will conclude from this the importance of the concept of self in the philosophical
context, which still occupies an important space in the thinking of modern and
contemporary philosophers. Here we will try to ask several questions, including what is the
dualism of the soul and body. How can the soul be a logical synthesis, an emanated mind,
or a subjective feeling? In this research, we will try to answer these questions and other
questions that will appear in the context of the research.