Do you want to publish a course? Click here

This research aims to study the play of " The adventure of Al –Mamlouk Gabers head " according to the theory of verbal verb . This theory which cares to study the meaning that considers it the use . There are clauses if you speak them ,they don’t giv e just word ,but they give actions at the same time ,and this what we are going to concentrate on in analyzing Saad ALah Wanous play . In this play I tried to study it as possible as I could according to this theory and dividing the verbs in it according to their indicative fields .
This research deals with the relationship between the meaning and the linguistic rank. It starts talking about the idiom of the linguistic standing of a word in a sentence according to the ancient and modern scholars. It also includes the role of t he linguistic standing in declaring the meaning and the relation of the linguistic sign in this concern. The linguistic rank is a part in a group called evidences, and it is two kinds: the fixed standingin which the words stand in a series that each one leads to the other. So the antecedent refers to the subsequent and the second word completes the meaning of the first one. And the flexible rank in which the word is characterized with flexibility of the linguistic standing which gives it semantic function or necessity of grammatical cause in exceeding the position. The research shows the relationship between the linguistic standing and the meaning where there is an intimate relation between them, and the whole context is the main base in the sentence order. To clarify this, the research analyses group of quotations. The research also shows the meaningful worth to change the final part the word and the intimate relation by showing the different meanings of the expression and the connection of this withsyntactic guidance and the linguistic rank and with return of the linguistic guidance to many reasons.
This research tries to address the problem of Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb Types of Rhetorics according to Al-Jahiz and Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb accusing Abi Othman Al-Jahiz of not giving rhetorics what it is worth, and of not studying it thoroughfully. Ibn Wahab claimed completing what is missed through his detailed study of the types of rhetorics, which are, to a large extent, similar to the types of rhetorics according to Abi Othman.The later referred to the importance of the relation between pronunciation, meaning and the necessity of the accordance between the two. In addition, meaning is prior to pronunciation because it depends upon thought and contemplation. He describes the types of rhetorics in a pyramidal sequential through levels that stem-- and result-- from each other. Similarly, Ibn wahab considers that the types of rhetorics result from each other. These types, according to critics, are a process of a birth of these forms. Despite the big similarity of the types of rhetorics according to both Ibn Wahab Al- Kateb and Abi Othman Al-Jahiz, the first was not only a transcriber, but also he added and clarified in certain areas. He exclusively talked about writers and classified them in one of five: transcript writer, pronunciation writer, contract writer, judgment writer and management writer. He also mentioned the most important features that a transcript writer must have and divided writers into three levels. He extended in talking about the types of handwriting and the forms of pens. These issues were dropped by Al-Jahiz when talking about the types of rhetorics.
Meaning precision and fulfillment has been the sole aim of any researcher in language, and since meaning is the outcome of grammatical structure in one specific context, that researcher must not prefer one to the other In other words, all of the g rammatical aspects fall in the trap of one controversial relation when it comes to meaning interpretation Therefore, I have tackled the concept of ' situation context ' in my research and the related terminologies and its impact in the field of language , the impact of the religious factor in attracting the old scientists to the significance of grammatical from and context, the outcome of both and to what extent those scientists have relied upon them when interpreting Qur'anic text, lines of poetry only to figure out of them some new rules.
This research attempts at focusing on the sing concept by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida and how he tried to present a different critical reading of this concept, busy answering the question and looking for new horizons of this critical rea ding that gose beyond the structural closure. this will be through a reading strategy that enables us to open up to the text and its multiplicities. So this research firstly introduces the concept as done by Derrida then proceeds to discuss the role of reader being one deadly strategy in creating or producing the sing, being one product of the text, and his ability to recall the memory. All of this is to clarify the distance among texts which the textual horizon creates, since its role dose not have to do only with the strength of sing as in difference but also it contains a structural motive.The sign is created once the effect and the one who is put away are traced down and thus creates enterainment among texts. Consequently, reading becomes an aesthetic experience that reconstructs the text anew till we get in this research to accumulative results in a conclusion that presents some of the ideas we ended up with when tacking this issue.
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا