This research studies the poetic necessity according to the critics who were interested
in poetry, and wrote criticized books chose between poetry and poets , and classified
poetry into section , depending on meaning and pronunciation .
Critics em
phasized the unique nature of poetry ,this uniqueness made the poets
question what was against then rules making apologies for it to keep it accepted .
Critics looked at poetry as another level of expression and approved it with terms and
conditions , such as / shame / judgement and poetry phenomena , such of it according to
necesseties , critics had different views about necessities , some refused it , and described
as ugliness that fades away by words water , while others approved it .
Whatever opinion have the critics about necessities , it is aphenomenon that took
their attention , some wrote whole books , and others chapters .
In most cases , no one called it as mistake , and the lasting effect of poetry that has
necessities keep it approved .
Meaning precision and fulfillment has been the sole aim of any researcher in
language, and since meaning is the outcome of grammatical structure in one specific
context, that researcher must not prefer one to the other
In other words, all of the g
rammatical aspects fall in the trap of one controversial
relation when it comes to meaning interpretation
Therefore, I have tackled the concept of ' situation context ' in my research and the
related terminologies and its impact in the field of language , the impact of the religious
factor in attracting the old scientists to the significance of grammatical from and context,
the outcome of both and to what extent those scientists have relied upon them when
interpreting Qur'anic text, lines of poetry only to figure out of them some new rules.