Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userPrevailing Proverbs and Unsystematic Verses In Ibn Sinan al-Khafaji's Criticism
الأمثالُ السّائرةُ و الأبياتُ الشَّارِدَةُ في نَقِدِ ابنِ سنانٍ الخفاجيّ
1422
2 97
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
من خلالِ مجموعة من الدّوالِّ المفهوميّةِ التي جعلها ابنُ سنانٍ صفاتٍ سابرةً لجودةِ الشّعرِ، و منها الأمثالُ السّائرةُ و الأبياتُ الشّاردةُ، نطلّ على عالَمِ الشّاعر بفضاءاتِوه النّفسيّةِ و الفكريّةِ و الاجتماعيّة؛ لأنّها تكشف عن خبايا شخصيّة المبدع ، و أسرارها المضمونيّة الكامنة، و تشكّل _ في الوقتِ ذاتِوه_ جزءاً من فهمِه للشّعرِ، فالشّعرُ يصدرُ عن الشّعورِ؛ عن خيالٍ نضّاخٍ بالمشاعر المؤثّرة عند المبدع ، فكيف إذا كان الشاعرُ ناقداً؟.
In the light of the conceptual remarks that Ibn Sinan adopts as evaluative features of the quality of poetry, among which are the prevailing proverbs and unsystematic verses, we do discover the world of the poet with its psychological, intellectual and social horizons. This is so since they uncover the secrets of the intuitive character of the creator and its potential introvert features; and, at the same time, they stand as one part of his understandability of poetry. Poetry expresses emotions, and reflects a vision full of influential sentiments of the creator. So, what if the poet were a critic?
References used
ابن منظور ، لسان العرب، تحقيقٌ: عبدالله علي الكبير، محمد أحمد حسب الله، هاشم محمد الشاذلي ،ً دار المعارف، القاهرة.
مطلوب، د. أحمد، - معجم مصطلحات النّقد العرب القديم – عرب عرب . ، مكتبة لبنان، بيروت،ط1, 2001 م.
rate research
Read More
Al-Wahidi is one of the greatest syntactic critics who have explained al-Mutanabbi's Anthology. His explanation contains concepts, and syntactic and critical opinions that deserve study and scrutiny. Al-Mutanabbi's poetry stands as a fertile domain f
or syntractic
criticism as is apparent in the critical arena over his poetry. Through his syntactic judgement, al-Wahidi attempts to support a doctrine, oppose some point of view, elaborate on what violates a proposed principle, or uncover a certain problematic issue somewhere in
al-Mutanabbi's poetry; specially when disagreement among critics' opinions appears, and dissimilarity among their doctrines and approaches materialises. Poetry was and is still one
significant source to formulate the syntactic structure, even if it witnessed some unstability due to narrators' uncertainties, and imprecision of transference. So, narratives and narrators
of poetry have varied, which has consequently created an obvious phenomenon that requires research, and study of the effect that may have on the syntactic rules. This is because syntax is one fundamental aspect of the culture of those interested in the literatry
exegeses. This study comes to focus on one essential aspect of syntactic criticism that is already applied to al-Mutanabbi's poetry.
This research studies the phenomena of "Al-Tadweer" and "Al-
Tadmeen" in the poetry of Ibn Al- Nakeeb, and paves the way for
subsequent discussion by defining them and examining their terminology,
then summarizes the critics views on them. After examining these two
terms practically, the research concludes that the cultural environment
had noticeable impact on disseminating them generally and in the poetry
of Ibn Al-Nakeeb particularly.
The aim of this research is to study the concept of history and evolution for
“IbnKhaldun” through a systematic illustration of the meaning of history. Therefore, we
present this research in order to reach the philosophy of history for “IbnKhaldun”
and to
highlight the importance of this philosopher as one of the founders of the philosophy of
history as his conception of history makes him close to contemporary philosophers.
This perception is crystallized to history on rejecting the “empiricalconcept”
radically. Therefore, we find that the history of “IbnKhaldun” is not a narrative of news,
but it is an explanation of eventsin which we can build it a new science.
The concept of progress that was crystallized in the eighteenth century has signs in
the introduction of IbnKhaldun in which he presented a methodology for studying history
in its interior movement and not in appearance. In addition, the problematic questions that
raised by “IbnKhaldun” opened horizons for knowledge and development such as:
What is the relationship between historical knowledge and historical writing? Is it
possible for history to be part of science?
This research also points to the errors of historians, which occur for many complex
reasons that might be psychological, social, political and cultural.
The errors also may happen because of a lack in knowledge about the laws of nature.
This study shows Lubaid s vision – as a poet – for
time and place . It talks about Lubaid s point of view
for these two words. Though , we all agree that time
and place have an argumentative effect in the whole
poetry in all ages . So , if we have an analytic view
apart of the historical approach which contributes
Lubaid just as a poet but not a genius .
This research tries to address the problem of Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb Types of Rhetorics
according to Al-Jahiz and Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb
accusing Abi Othman Al-Jahiz of not giving rhetorics what it is worth, and of not
studying it thoroughfully. Ibn Wahab
claimed completing what is missed through his
detailed study of the types of rhetorics, which are, to a large extent, similar to the types of
rhetorics according to Abi Othman.The later referred to the importance of the relation
between pronunciation, meaning and the necessity of the accordance between the two. In
addition, meaning is prior to pronunciation because it depends upon thought and
contemplation. He describes the types of rhetorics in a pyramidal sequential through levels
that stem-- and result-- from each other.
Similarly, Ibn wahab considers that the types of rhetorics result from each other.
These types, according to critics, are a process of a birth of these forms.
Despite the big similarity of the types of rhetorics according to both Ibn Wahab Al-
Kateb and Abi Othman Al-Jahiz, the first was not only a transcriber, but also he added and
clarified in certain areas. He exclusively talked about writers and classified them in one of
five: transcript writer, pronunciation writer, contract writer, judgment writer and
management writer. He also mentioned the most important features that a transcript writer
must have and divided writers into three levels. He extended in talking about the types of
handwriting and the forms of pens. These issues were dropped by Al-Jahiz when talking
about the types of rhetorics.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
