Studies and research about rhetoric have varied concerning the definition of rhetoric,
but most of them look at rhetoric from on side only. Rhetoric was classified as being a kind
of research concerned with the art of persuasion in its techniques,
means and components.
But it is certain that the political and social conditions of the greak life, led these
philosophical studies and linguistic research especially, rhetoric. This made Aristotle
divide rhetoric into three sections.
The research delt with two main titles, the first one was Rhetoric according to
Aristotle. It combines between mans ability to speak and express on one hand becavse man
is a speaker and expressor who naturally looks for persuasion. In his speech, he tries to
convince as many people as possible. To do this, he uses many instinctive means. Aristotle
was concerned with rhetoric due to its mental and psychological sides.
He tried to find a kind of balance between the means of persuasion and means of
influence. He made convincing help infuencing. He diffentiated between kinds of proofs,
the made proofs and the non made proofs. The other ones were the base of the rhetoric
structure for Aristotle. The argumentative linguistic text is different from other texts that it
builds an interactive structure based on some means that aim to persuade and affect the
recipient.
The research attempts to approach a linguistic criteria that it's
concepts still in growing phase. It deals with uncovering the
manifestations of the address "recipient" image, the transformations and
the theoretical approach strategy at linguistic text.
The renewal is the nature of life, and a norm of alaah in his
creatures, which is a general phenomenon in every time and
place, including all aspects of existence through which the process
of continuous adaptation with the developments imposed by the
nature of the age.
The renewal is the nature of life, and a norm of alaah in his
creatures, which is a general phenomenon in every time and
place, including all aspects of existence through which the process
of continuous adaptation with the developments imposed by the
nature of the age.
The research attempts to compromise a linguistic case to be understand able it’s the
theory in phase the formation, and it is the detection hangs in about the image which
appeared in its personality of the oratorical self, the transformations which
occurred on it,
and their application mechanism to a linguistic text which is the speech of AL- HASAN
Ibn ALI Ibn ABI TALEB In Sabatt.
Moreover, The research attempts to set up a compromise that clarifies both sides of
saying: theoretical and practical, so the research to importance indicated the rhetoric in
describing its industry, and seeks to attracting the addresses "receivers" and the impacting
and persuading them, and explain the components of the communication process, and
illustrated the manifestations of the ethos, started with the advanced ethos that pertains to
the person speaking, and through the oratorical ethos, it is the image that the speech
producer tried to construct in the text, to reach the image of the self was formed after the
end of the discourse, which proposed usher naming the post-rhetorical ethos, and how the
recipient rebelled against the preacher when the third verb of the speech act was achieved.
The analytical descriptive and method might sound the perfect way via which one
can get to the speech of AL- HASAN Ibn ALI, analysis of procedural processes in the
study of linguistic phenomena after determining their scope time and environment, and
detecting shifts in the image of the discourse product "ethos" .
This research deals with the phenomenon of combining rhetoric and poetry at a number of the Gahleon, and the statement of the effect of this combining in their poetry, explaining through the issue of conflict of prestige betweenthe orator and the poe
t in pre-Islamic era, and how this conflict has been compromised between who combined the technocracy, as the research shows the reason oflack of those who gathered between technocracy. The effect of combining in poetry is dealt with research on two levels: the stylistic level, and shows all forms of repetition: repeating letters, words and methods. While appears in the substantive level (moral): the pursuit of incomprehensible, the concentration on thinking and subjects, and the large number of wisdom and wills.
Any one, who looks up the term circumlocution in linguistic and
rhetorical dictionaries, will always find that the meanings of this term are as follows: slyness, deception , lying or fallacy
If we closely examine the quotations and poems relating t
o deception,
we will reject that this term relate to the clarity, cohesiveness and
unpretentious with which Arabs are acquainted.
This research aims to study circumlocution in order to find out its flaws
and to refute the opinions of rhetoricians through reading quotations
deliberately .The number of quotations can be easily counted. Most of
those quotations do not coincide with the definition of circumlocution
while some are fabricated. Therefore, this research stresses the
importance to exclude the term circumlocution from the Arabic
rhetorical types which manifest in the wonderful aspects of the Holy
Quran. The quotations of circumlocution will be considered as examples of spontaneous intuition or sort of improvisation.
This research explains that the Arab rhetoric and fluency, the beauty of
their styles and the logical thinking contradict with the meaning of the
term circumlocution.
