Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userالأخلاق الدينية و مسألة التأويل عند ابن رشد
980
5 62
0
(
0
)
Added by
Damascus University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2003
fields
Philosphy
and research's language is
العربية
Authors
عصام غصن عبود( باحث )
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
يكتسب هذا البحث جدته و أصالته و قيمته العلمية، من أنه يخوض في إشكالية التأويل و علاقتها المباشرة بالأخلاق الدينية السائدة، و بيان المناقشات و الخلافات التي برزت على هامش هذه الإشكالية لتوضيح الصورة الحقيقية لموقع ابن رشد في السياق التاريخي، ضمن إطار هذه الإشكالية حصرًا. و قد تناول البحث القضايا الأساسية العالقة التي تدور في فلك مسألة التأويل. و أهمها قضية الحقيقة المزدوجة، و تقسيم الناس إلى طبقات اجتماعية، و قضية تفضيل الفلسفة على الدين. و كل هذه القضايا متعلقة تعلقًا مباشرًا بالأخلاق الدينية، و ناجمة عن مسألة التأويل بآنٍ واحد. و خلص البحث إلى نفي الاتهام الموجه إلى ابن رشد بشأنها، فضلا عما جاء في البحث من شرح مفصل لمسألة التأويل في سياقها التاريخي، و علاقتها بالأخلاق الدينية.
No English abstract
References used
ابن تيمية، تقي الدين بن عبد الحليم، موافقة صريح المعقول لصريح المنقول، دار الكتب العلمية، بيروت، ١٩٨٥
ابن رشد، محمد بن أحمد بن محمد، فصل المقال وتقرير ما بين الشريعة والحكمة من الاتصال، تحقيق عبد المجيد همو، دار معد للطباعة والنشر والتوزيع، دمشق، ١٩٩٦ م.
ابن رشد، محمد بن أحمد بن محمد، مناهج الأدلة في عقائد الملة، تحقيق محمود قاسم، مكتبة الأنجلو المصرية، القاهرة، ١٩٥٥ م.
rate research
Read More
The study of the ethical issue in the Aristotelian attitude and Averroes one is the aim
of this research. It also studies and analyzes the point of view of each one of them in three
fields which are:
• The originality of ethics and its field
• Th
e virtue theory
• Virtues varieties and arrangements
According to our dealing with this case, we work on specifying the degree of
similarities and differences between the two philosophers. We try to show the Aristotelian
moral effect in the Islamic_ Arab intellectual space represented by Averroes whose
understanding of Aristotelian ethics in the process of reading and analyzing Plato
Republic.
In the light of the above, we have the right to ask whether Averroes has an
independent ethical theory or he followed the approach of his predecessors, especially
Aristotle in his similarity with his ethical issue.
This research discusses the most important pieces of evidence put forward by Ash'ari thinkers on two very important issues: formation of the world and the idea of causality. Depending on IbnRushd's reading, the paper also highlights the most import
ant loose and weak points Ash'ari inferences. Ibin Rushd, a pioneer of the intellectual trend in Islamic philosophy, saw in the treatment of these two issues represented an epistemological obstacle faced by Arab-Islamic mind and stood between it and the causal understanding of the universe. The philosopher Averroes sensed the danger of the absence of objective consciousness of the universe and the nature in Arabic and Islamic philosophy. In an attempt transform society from a state of theological submission to one of scientific certainty, he tried to lay the ground for a vision depending on the mind.
This research deals with the most important political ideas that Averroes dealt with through his summarization of the Aristotle's book Rhetoric, in contrast to Avicenna and Al-Farabi's logical approach to this book. We will not go through the logical
ideas in Rhetoric but rather focus on the Aristotelian political and philosophical issues which Averroes depends on in his summary of the book. It is an attempt to focus on Averroes's political ideas which preceded his summarization of Plato 's The Republic due to the fact that he didn't obtain the Arabic translation of Aristotle's book Politics.
We try in this research to focus on Averroes's way of summary regarding commitment to the Aristotelian text and its literal denotations on some occasions, or the interpretive reading on other occasions. In addition, it will focus on Averroes's reliance on his predecessors' explanations of the same book to clarify some statements, and then his attempt to apply some Aristotelian political ideas on the Arab-Muslim political reality in the Middle Ages.
The paper Sheds light on one of the most important problems among the whole problems
that we find in the history of philosophy, namely, the problem of the relationship between wisdom
and Sharia law, trying to disclose the nature of the relationship
between wisdom and law in order to
detect intellectual conflicts or issues that the philosophers tried to detect the pivotal and key points
between wisdom and Sharia law, and philosophy and religion, through the general cultural state
prevailing in the Arab society during the Islamic middle ages. In addition, we will try to clarify the
theoretical and methodological foundations of the problem of reconciling and highlight the
ideological goals that drove the philosophers to reconcile between wisdom and Sharia.
This research tackled the attitude of interpretation towards the issue of metaphor,
especially the French philosopher's view Paul Ricuor. It also dealt with the nature of
metaphor as suggested by him via critiquing the attitude in which he finds a
mere aesthetic
and substitutive ornament from the one hand, while taking it as innovative means to touch
reality on the other hand. Consequently, it is a cognitive value with the aim of contacting
the outside world and getting to know it then the research proceeded to discuss the
intellectual basics of metaphor according to Ricuor. He noticed that there is no way to
understand the nature of metaphor without understanding its basics. This has made it
possible to handle the knowledgeable and innovative function of metaphor be it the present
side always in language; that which never fades. So, it was not possible to handle metaphor
inside language without wondering how thinking works. Here Ricuor differentiates
between living and consumed metaphor on the basis of the ability of innovation and
knowledge provided by each one of them. Additionally, he has stated that metaphor is
there inside interpretation as it is through it. Such a presence of metaphor inside the field of
interpretation is the reason why one can tackle this polysemy. This polysemy results in this
on the one hand and in its openness on the world of human act; work and practice on the
other hand. This way, metaphor in interpretation is presented as a future language. The
research has ended up with a bunch of results through questioning the concept of metaphor
in a philosophic interpretative way.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
