The role of the Supreme Constitutional Court in the control on the constitutionality of laws in the Syrian Arab Republic between 1973 and 2012 constitutions

The control on the constitutionality of laws, one of the most important guarantees that reinforce the principle of the Constitution as the source highess the ultimate and the highest for all legal activities in the state. highess the Constitution as it becomes the principle of illusory if there is no body in the state holds control over the Compatibility with the legislative acts of brokerage Constitution In order to achieve this purpose, the Constitution of 1973 established the Supreme Constitutional Court and entrusted with the presidency of the exercise of the job, which was keen to adopt the Constitution of 2012, with his quest to expand the role of the court in the exercise of this power will try this research highlight the role of this Court through a comparative study between the constitutions of 1973 and 2012 by analysing of constitutional provisions governing the control exercised by the Supreme Constitutional Court in the Syrian Arab Republic. ...

Illuminations on the constitutionality of the law of the Supreme Constitutional Court

In Confirmation of the principle of the Highness of the Constitution and its maintenance, the constitutional legislator granted_ in the Constitution of 2012_ the Supreme Constitutional Court Jurisdiction to monitor the constitutionality of laws in the State. If it is proved to the court that the law violates the Constitution, the court will cancel what was contrary to its provisions. This makes the Supreme Constitutional Court, the legal guardian of the legitimacy of the State. Therefore it may seem strange to research on the constitutionality of the law of the Supreme Constitutional Court, which is the court competent to determine the constitutionality of all laws in the country if the constitutionality had been challenged before. However, this is soon to be dissipated if we knew the mechanism to appeal the constitutionality of laws that require objection from the President or a fifth of the Parliament on the constitutionality of a law before promulgating, or the objection of a fifth of the parliament on the constitutionality of legislative decree within a period of fifteen days following the date of it's display on the Parliament or through referral thurst of unconstitutionality by the court headmistress in the appeal, If the appeal turns out to be serious . This is a mechanism that may not be realized due to lack of proportion of the fifth of the Parliament which is needed to move the intercept members of parliament or as a result of omissions of the normal legislator to pay attention to the existence of a constitutional violation law in the first place Hence the importance of this research in which it will aim to highlight the violations that have occurred in the Constitutional Court Act. On this basis, it is hoped to alert legislators to the need to amend the law on the Supreme Constitutional Court as it is not reasonable that the law of the Supreme Constitutional Court Is faulted with unconstitutionality

The Role of Judiciary in Supervising the Elections and Achieving its Fairness

Integrity of the elections has become a feature of modern democratic systems. It measures the extent of a democratic . State: and in order to reach that desired integrity. Syria adapted a number of mechanisms to activate and devote the integrity and transparency of the elections quickly- Where it adopted the principle of judicial supervision of the electoral process . Which is intended to frame and organize the course of the electoral process so as to ensure its good mevement. As an embodiment of this principle. And in the course of the political reforms made by the leadership: latest legislator of the High Comission to oversee the elections exclusively composed of judes nominated by the high judicial conclcouncil. The legislator also changed the composition of the local electoral commissions by conferring a judicial nature. Where each electoral commissions headed by a judge.

Administrative Disputes before the Supreme Constitutional Court

This paper seeks to compare how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or the Supreme Administrative Court in Jordan and Egypt. Therefore, this study aims to highlight how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or the Supreme Administrative Court. It is true that prior to the enacting of the Administrative Justice Act No. 27 of 2014 , the Jordanian legislator used to deal with the High Court of Justice as one of the special judicial authorities, which may raise the case of allegation of unconstitutionality directly, similar to the Court of Cassation. Unlike the substantive Court which sees the case, the Jordan legislator obliged it to raise the allegation of unconstitutionality to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation will decide whether to raise the appeal of unconstitutionality or not. As for the Egyptian context, Egypt depends on the law of the State Council No. 48 of 1979. This law 1979 entrusted to Court of Administrative Justice Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to raise alleged unconstitutionality law directly to the Supreme Constitutional Court.

حول تفعيل دور المحكمة الدستورية العليا السورية دراسة مقارنة

في هذه الدراسة التي تناولنا فيها تشكيل المحكمة و اختصاصاتها، و بعد ما يزيد عن ربع قرن على إنشائها، فقد انصب اهتمامنا على أهمية تعزيز و تفعيل دورها، و ذلك من خلال مقارنة هذا الدور مع دور المجلس الدستوري الفرنسي و اللبناني.