Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAdministrative Disputes before the Supreme Constitutional Court
المنازعات الإدارية أمام المحكمة الدستورية العليا
1797
0 31
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
هدفت الدراسة إلى التعرف على كيفية اتصال المحكمة الدستورية العليا بالدفع بعدم دستورية قانون أو نظام متعلق بالفصل في الدعوى المنظورة أمام المحكمة الإدارية أو المحكمة الإدارية العليا، حيث كان المشرع الأردني قبل صدور قانون القضاء الإداري رقم 27 لسنة 2014، يعامل محكمة العدل العليا بوصفها احدى الجهات القضائية الخاصة التي لها أن ترفع الدفع بعدم الدستورية مباشرة اسوه بمحكمة التمييز. على خلاف محكمة الموضوع الناظرة للدعوى و التي الزمها بوجوب رفع الدفع بعدم الدستورية إلى محكمة التمييز و التي لها البت في رفع الطعن بعدم الدستورية من عدمه. و في سبيل ذلك لجأنا إلى المقارنة مع الوضع في مصر و كيفية اتصال الدفع بعدم دستورية قانون أو نظام عند عرض المنازعة الإدارية على محكمة القضاء الإداري أو محكمة الإدارية أو المحكمة الإدارية العليا استنادا لقانون مجلس الدولة رقم 48 لسنة 1979. حيث أناط المشرع المصري بهذه المحاكم أن ترفع الدفع بعدم الدستورية مباشرة إلى المحكمة الدستورية العليا.
This paper seeks to compare how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or the Supreme Administrative Court in Jordan and Egypt. Therefore, this study aims to highlight how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or the Supreme Administrative Court. It is true that prior to the enacting of the Administrative Justice Act No. 27 of 2014 , the Jordanian legislator used to deal with the High Court of Justice as one of the special judicial authorities, which may raise the case of allegation of unconstitutionality directly, similar to the Court of Cassation. Unlike the substantive Court which sees the case, the Jordan legislator obliged it to raise the allegation of unconstitutionality to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation will decide whether to raise the appeal of unconstitutionality or not. As for the Egyptian context, Egypt depends on the law of the State Council No. 48 of 1979. This law 1979 entrusted to Court of Administrative Justice Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to raise alleged unconstitutionality law directly to the Supreme Constitutional Court.
References used
قانون المحكمة الدستورية الأردني رقم 15 لسنة 2012 م.
قانون المحكمة الدستورية المصري رقم 48 لسنة 1979 م.
rate research
Read More
In Confirmation of the principle of the Highness of the Constitution and its
maintenance, the constitutional legislator granted_ in the Constitution of 2012_ the
Supreme Constitutional Court Jurisdiction to monitor the constitutionality of laws
in
the State. If it is proved to the court that the law violates the Constitution, the
court will cancel what was contrary to its provisions.
This makes the Supreme Constitutional Court, the legal guardian of the legitimacy
of the State.
Therefore it may seem strange to research on the constitutionality of the law of the
Supreme Constitutional Court, which is the court competent to determine the
constitutionality of all laws in the country if the constitutionality had been
challenged before. However, this is soon to be dissipated if we knew the mechanism
to appeal the constitutionality of laws that require objection from the President or a
fifth of the Parliament on the constitutionality of a law before promulgating, or the
objection of a fifth of the parliament on the constitutionality of legislative decree
within a period of fifteen days following the date of it's display on the Parliament or
through referral thurst of unconstitutionality by the court headmistress in the
appeal, If the appeal turns out to be serious . This is a mechanism that may not be
realized due to lack of proportion of the fifth of the Parliament which is needed to
move the intercept members of parliament or as a result of omissions of the normal
legislator to pay attention to the existence of a constitutional violation law in the first
place
Hence the importance of this research in which it will aim to highlight the violations
that have occurred in the Constitutional Court Act.
On this basis, it is hoped to alert legislators to the need to amend the law on the
Supreme Constitutional Court as it is not reasonable that the law of the Supreme
Constitutional Court Is faulted with unconstitutionality
This study aims to high light the effort of the Jordan legislator in order to developed
the Administrative Judiciary Law and defeat all the challenges for the advancement of law,
especially after the constitutional amendment in Jordan during 2011 .
The Law appreciates
the principle of administrative trail in two degrees as issued under Administrative Judicial
Law No 27 in 2014. Nevertheless, these initiatives apprehend important steps to build
institutional State that respects human rights and promotes democratic values in society.
This study analyses critically the new Jordanian Administrative Judicial Law and
compares with Egyptian Administrative Judicial Law, in order to pay attention on
weakness and strengths of the Jordanian legislation. The critical analysis can help to make
the Administrative Judicial Law as unique by following the experience of the Egypt.
The control on the constitutionality of laws, one of the most important guarantees
that reinforce the principle of the Constitution as the source highess the ultimate and
the highest for all legal activities in the state. highess the Constitution a
s it becomes
the principle of illusory if there is no body in the state holds control over the
Compatibility with the legislative acts of brokerage Constitution In order to achieve
this purpose, the Constitution of 1973 established the Supreme Constitutional Court
and entrusted with the presidency of the exercise of the job, which was keen to adopt
the Constitution of 2012, with his quest to expand the role of the court in the exercise
of this power will try this research highlight the role of this Court through a
comparative study between the constitutions of 1973 and 2012 by analysing of
constitutional provisions governing the control exercised by the Supreme
Constitutional Court in the Syrian Arab Republic. ...
The article aims to critically analyze the development of individual applications
proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights, excluding friendly
settlement procedures.
The present research addresses one of the new and important financial and taxation
issues, namely: the resolution of tax disputes via administrative means. It seeks out to find
resolutions for tax disputes that arise between the taxpayer and the ta
x administration when
applying the revenue law where administrative committees formed for that purpose would
undertake resolving these disputes before being referred to the judicial stage in order to
lessen the burden laid upon the judicial stage. This research discusses the importance of
identifying the nature of tax disputes, concept, characteristics, and the reasons that lead to
tax disputes between taxpayers and tax administration.
The study attempts to explain the concept of objection, its conditions and effects. The
research also addresses the administrative committees specialized in resolving tax disputes
in the administrative stage shedding the light on their formation, mechanism of work,
decisions, best formulas of taxpayer-tax administration resolutions for tax disputes, and
best solutions for the problems facing both the taxpayer and the tax administration in
resolving tax disputes arising between them via administrative means.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
