Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userConstruction Of Verb In Ugaritic Language A Comparative Study
أبنية الفعل في اللغة الأوغاريتية دراسة مقارنة
1042
3 10
0
(
0
)
Added by
Tishreen University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2018
fields
Literature
and research's language is
العربية
Authors
سميرة الراهب( باحث )
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
ينعقد هذا البحث للوقوف على أبنية الفعل في اللغة الأوغاريتية في صورة دراسة مقارنة باللغة العربية. بينت هذه الدراسة أن الفعل فيها يُدْرَس من حيث اشتقاقه (جذره)، و أحرفه الأصلية (تجرده) و أحرفه المزيدة (السوابق و اللواحق و الحشو)، و من حيث صيغ أوزانه ( تصريفه ) و حالات إعرابه و بنائه ، و الأزمنة التي يدل عليها ، كما يُدْرَسُ بالنظر إلى معناه من حيث اللزوم و التعدي، إضافة إلى دراسة العلاقات ( الوظائف النحوية ) في الجملة الأوغاريتية .
This research is done to identify the structures of the verb in Ugaritic Language in a comparative study in Arabic. This study shows that the verb in Ugaritic Language is studied in terms of its derivative “root”, its original characters “abstraction”, its extra characters , suffixes, prefixes and, infix , its form and metres “inflection”, its syntactic forms , and its tenses that it indicates. Also this study shows that the verb in Ugaritic Language is studied by looking into its meaning whether it is an intransitive or transitive verb. In addition to study the relations “syntactic functions” in the Ugaritic sentence.
References used
Aistleitner , J.Worterbuch der Ugaritischen Sprache, Berlin,1963
Gordon, c.h. , Ugaritic Textbook, 3 vols (Grammer, glossary ) indices, texts in transliteration, Roma, 1965
Olmololete , G. and Sanmartin , J.A Dictionary of the Ugaritic Language in the Alphabetic tradition, Leiden-Boston, 2004
rate research
Read More
This research is done to study the case markers in the Ugaritic language and see the
syntactic positions of expressions in the sentence, by applying the comparatives method.
We show in this study that the noun is used in the case marked expressions
, i. e its case
changes in accordance with to its place in the sentence and in accordance to the functional
element preceding it, so that it could be nominative, accusative or object to a preposition.
And our study shows that the present verb could be also cased-marked: it can be
nominative, accusative or jussive, and that the case markers can be in this sematic
language: case markers, letters, a vowel deletion, or nun- deletion too.
Because the Ugaritic language has three symbols for the Hamza with short sounds,
they correspond to the case markers in Arabic and the case shows itself in (a) (u) and (i)
showing themselves in final position clearly. By comparing the Ugaritic expressions and
the Arabic ones we have noticed that we have three case markers, namely (a) (u) and (i).
This study alludes to the case markers common in both the language and to those that are
different too.
Arabic and Ugaritic languages both belong to one linguistic
origin, and are connected with similar relations that came to both from
the Proto Semitic.
The linguistic materials are precisely read from the Ugarit texts
in order to extract all joint
or non-joint features. The comparisons and
their counters in Arabic languages will be in the light of the other Semitic
languages such as Phoenician-Canaanite, Hebrew, Syriac, and Akkadian
languages.
And since the letter “M” is a linguistic sound, which plays in
other languages ( rather than Arabic) the role that letter “N” plays
grammatically in Arabic language like dual ,normal, phonetic alterations,
and in structuring verbs, names, articles and pronouns.
Such comparative linguistic study between the two languages is
indicative dictionaric and phonetic comparisons, Moreover, it is a
continuation of the old origins of phonetic structures of pronunciation in
Arabic Language, a rejection of the indicative alternations and an
extraction of the phonetic laws that control the linguistic materials which
are under those linguistic comparisons.
Knowing the vowels in the Hebrew language is one of the most important obstacles faced by learners of the Hebrew language, because of the complexity compared to their counterparts in the Arabic language. I have worked hard, in my research, on
simplifying them, as far as possible, for the Arab recipients through comparing them to their counterparts in the Arabic language. This research may show us that most Vowels in Hebrew have similar counterparts in Arabic, but Arab linguist did not allocate an independent vowel for each case as Hebrew linguists did, which suggests to the neophyte that the number of the symbols of vowels in Hebrew is larger than the number of those in Arabic.
This research aims to focus on the changes that happen to a Hebraic word when
adding extensions.
We discovered that adding those extensions affects the rhythm changes, the voice
order changes, deleting and moving it, and sometimes return it to its
base, also adding the
extensions plays a role in changing the meaning.
We done all this work by comparing with the Arabic language, so the worth of this
work become greater, because the two languages belongs to the same language family.
The /n/ is an original consonant in Hebrew and Arabic, and comparative linguistic studies confirm its originality in all Semitic languages. Due to the importance of the /n/ in the vocal structure of the Arabic word, the Quranic literature allocated
chapters to study its rules. But the importance of this consonant is not restricted to phonetics only. We have found that it has effects on the linguistic and grammatical structure of the word in both Hebrew and Arabic. Therefore, our study aims to unveil the importance of this consonant and its role in the linguistic structure of the word in both languages. To achieve this we adopted the comparative linguistic approach.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
