Arabic and Ugaritic languages both belong to one linguistic
origin, and are connected with similar relations that came to both from
the Proto Semitic.
The linguistic materials are precisely read from the Ugarit texts
in order to extract all joint
or non-joint features. The comparisons and
their counters in Arabic languages will be in the light of the other Semitic
languages such as Phoenician-Canaanite, Hebrew, Syriac, and Akkadian
languages.
And since the letter “M” is a linguistic sound, which plays in
other languages ( rather than Arabic) the role that letter “N” plays
grammatically in Arabic language like dual ,normal, phonetic alterations,
and in structuring verbs, names, articles and pronouns.
Such comparative linguistic study between the two languages is
indicative dictionaric and phonetic comparisons, Moreover, it is a
continuation of the old origins of phonetic structures of pronunciation in
Arabic Language, a rejection of the indicative alternations and an
extraction of the phonetic laws that control the linguistic materials which
are under those linguistic comparisons.
This research is based on comparisons between Arabic and Ugaritic.The considered side requires both theoretical and practical requirements .The theoretical requirement is for prepare an Arabic lexicon demonstrates the Lingual developments
and describe the Ugaritic language semanticlly.The practical one is by etymoning . it means studying the etymons of the Arabic vocabularies in the ancient semantic . and prepare for Ugaritic lexicon The Ugaritic language is considered as a practical example of the semitic language in the comparative analysis for the lexical and semantic phenomena Arabic is one of the nearest languages to the Ugaritic, and both of them retain the ancient sematic language structure
