Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Case Markers In Ugaritic Language A Comparative Study

علامات الإعراب في اللّغة الأوغاريتية دراسة مقارنة

1284   0   33   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2017
  fields Arabic
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

This research is done to study the case markers in the Ugaritic language and see the syntactic positions of expressions in the sentence, by applying the comparatives method. We show in this study that the noun is used in the case marked expressions, i. e its case changes in accordance with to its place in the sentence and in accordance to the functional element preceding it, so that it could be nominative, accusative or object to a preposition. And our study shows that the present verb could be also cased-marked: it can be nominative, accusative or jussive, and that the case markers can be in this sematic language: case markers, letters, a vowel deletion, or nun- deletion too. Because the Ugaritic language has three symbols for the Hamza with short sounds, they correspond to the case markers in Arabic and the case shows itself in (a) (u) and (i) showing themselves in final position clearly. By comparing the Ugaritic expressions and the Arabic ones we have noticed that we have three case markers, namely (a) (u) and (i). This study alludes to the case markers common in both the language and to those that are different too.

References used
Aistleitner, J.Worterbuch der ugaritischenSprach, Berlin, 1963
Bordreuil, P.-Pardee, D. Manuel d' Ougaritque, 2004
Gordon, c.h., Ugaritic Textbook, 3 vols (Grammar, glossary), indices, texts in transliteration, Roma, 1965
rate research

Read More

This research is done to identify the structures of the verb in Ugaritic Language in a comparative study in Arabic. This study shows that the verb in Ugaritic Language is studied in terms of its derivative “root”, its original characters “abstract ion”, its extra characters , suffixes, prefixes and, infix , its form and metres “inflection”, its syntactic forms , and its tenses that it indicates. Also this study shows that the verb in Ugaritic Language is studied by looking into its meaning whether it is an intransitive or transitive verb. In addition to study the relations “syntactic functions” in the Ugaritic sentence.
Arabic and Ugaritic languages both belong to one linguistic origin, and are connected with similar relations that came to both from the Proto Semitic. The linguistic materials are precisely read from the Ugarit texts in order to extract all joint or non-joint features. The comparisons and their counters in Arabic languages will be in the light of the other Semitic languages such as Phoenician-Canaanite, Hebrew, Syriac, and Akkadian languages. And since the letter “M” is a linguistic sound, which plays in other languages ( rather than Arabic) the role that letter “N” plays grammatically in Arabic language like dual ,normal, phonetic alterations, and in structuring verbs, names, articles and pronouns. Such comparative linguistic study between the two languages is indicative dictionaric and phonetic comparisons, Moreover, it is a continuation of the old origins of phonetic structures of pronunciation in Arabic Language, a rejection of the indicative alternations and an extraction of the phonetic laws that control the linguistic materials which are under those linguistic comparisons.
Knowing the vowels in the Hebrew language is one of the most important obstacles faced by learners of the Hebrew language, because of the complexity compared to their counterparts in the Arabic language. I have worked hard, in my research, on simplifying them, as far as possible, for the Arab recipients through comparing them to their counterparts in the Arabic language. This research may show us that most Vowels in Hebrew have similar counterparts in Arabic, but Arab linguist did not allocate an independent vowel for each case as Hebrew linguists did, which suggests to the neophyte that the number of the symbols of vowels in Hebrew is larger than the number of those in Arabic.
The Syrian legislator has specified novelty in the Patent Law as one of the objective conditions to obtain the patent, where it has adopted absolute novelty, and he considered the novelty of an invention void if it became known before the date of fil ing the application for a patent or the date of priority that is requested legally. we have also discussed the cases in which the invention becomes known but it does not lose its novelty if it became known before the date of filing the application for a patent or the date of priority that is legally requested, such as in the case of exhibiting an invention in formals exhibits, and we have also addressed a case that the Syrian law has not discussed, and it is the case of exposing the secret of the invention against the will of the inventor, and recommended adding this article: “ An invention does not lose its novelty if the exposure happens within the six months prior to filing the application or the date of priority that is legally requested, and was the result of an illegal action done by others.
This research aims to focus on the changes that happen to a Hebraic word when adding extensions. We discovered that adding those extensions affects the rhythm changes, the voice order changes, deleting and moving it, and sometimes return it to its base, also adding the extensions plays a role in changing the meaning. We done all this work by comparing with the Arabic language, so the worth of this work become greater, because the two languages belongs to the same language family.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا