Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Eloquence critical by SalahAldeen Al safady

النقد البلاغي عند صلاح الدين الصفدي

12272   10   283   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2014
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Eloquence critical is part of old Arabic critical and it is artistic level wich the language is looking for to many levels in general meaning and in literature language in particular . Eloquence critical is attempt to discover literature Values and beauty in literature texts neither poetic text nor prose text In critical , there is have to result critical decision it is depend on eloquence and rhetoric . In the fiest century , the old critic was alat of major know ledge at imaginations , photo and advantages . thow out approach of creation texts and analysis of elements In the first centurycriticaldidn,t know , that content of also old century . Alsafadyreperesnts of one of critic in eight of the Hegira Century which enter in square of the critical . Alsafady is belive in eloquence and help to have one of means sources . He was ahmempt to discover literature values and beauty to many colours and eloquence phenomenons . That he was pass bay during his explaines and his transtation . He was eloquence know ledge to mention colour it is comment in this . And there are many connected refer to benefit and literature value to many this know phenomenons . Al safady realizes this know ledge splendor speaking have colour in literature work which is necessariy to mony need in literature expression In the same time he was find side in self reader that is basis side in invention process.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
يتناول البحث النقد البلاغي عند صلاح الدين الصفدي، أحد نقاد القرن الثامن الهجري، الذي اعتمد على البلاغة في نقده للأدب العربي. يركز البحث على كيفية استخدام الصفدي للبلاغة في إصدار أحكام نقدية وتقييم القيم الفنية والجمالية في النصوص الأدبية، سواء كانت شعرية أو نثرية. يوضح البحث أن الصفدي لم يكتفِ بذكر الألوان البلاغية فقط، بل سعى إلى تحليلها وتبيان فوائدها وتأثيرها النفسي على المتلقي. كما يتناول البحث منهج الصفدي في دراسة الظواهر البلاغية مثل التشبيه والاستعارة والجناس والكناية والمقابلة، ويبرز اهتمامه بالموازنة بين الجوانب الفنية والجمالية لهذه الظواهر. يعتمد البحث على المنهج الوصفي التحليلي ويستند إلى مصادر متعددة في البلاغة والنقد الأدبي.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: على الرغم من الجهد الكبير الذي بذلته الباحثة في تحليل النقد البلاغي عند صلاح الدين الصفدي، إلا أن هناك بعض النقاط التي يمكن أن تكون محل نقد. أولاً، الدراسة تركز بشكل كبير على الجوانب البلاغية دون أن تعطي اهتماماً كافياً للجوانب الأخرى من النقد الأدبي مثل السياق التاريخي والاجتماعي للنصوص. ثانياً، هناك ميل واضح للاعتماد على المصادر التقليدية دون محاولة تقديم تفسير جديد أو مقاربة مبتكرة للنصوص. ثالثاً، الدراسة تعتمد بشكل كبير على الاقتباسات الطويلة من النصوص الأصلية، مما يجعلها تبدو أحياناً وكأنها تلخيص أكثر منها تحليل نقدي. وأخيراً، كان من الممكن أن تكون الدراسة أكثر شمولية إذا تناولت تأثير نقد الصفدي على النقاد اللاحقين وكيفية تطور النقد البلاغي بعده.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو النقد البلاغي وكيف استخدمه صلاح الدين الصفدي في نقده الأدبي؟

    النقد البلاغي هو نقد يعتمد على البلاغة وعلومها في إصدار أحكام نقدية وتقييم القيم الفنية والجمالية في النصوص الأدبية. استخدم صلاح الدين الصفدي هذا النوع من النقد للكشف عن الجوانب الفنية والجمالية في النصوص الأدبية، سواء كانت شعرية أو نثرية، وأصدر أحكاماً نقدية تعتمد على البلاغة وعلومها مثل التشبيه والاستعارة والجناس والكناية والمقابلة.

  2. ما هي الظواهر البلاغية التي ركز عليها الصفدي في نقده؟

    ركز الصفدي في نقده على عدة ظواهر بلاغية منها التشبيه، الاستعارة، الجناس، الكناية، والمقابلة. وقد سعى إلى تحليل هذه الظواهر وتبيان فوائدها وتأثيرها النفسي على المتلقي، بالإضافة إلى تقييم القيم الفنية والجمالية لكل منها.

  3. ما هو منهج البحث الذي اعتمدته الباحثة في دراسة نقد الصفدي؟

    اعتمدت الباحثة في دراستها على المنهج الوصفي التحليلي، حيث قامت بوصف الظواهر البلاغية التي تناولها الصفدي وفهم مضمونها، بالإضافة إلى تحليل مكونات النص الأدبي وإبراز القيم الفنية والجمالية لهذه الظواهر.

  4. ما هي النقاط النقدية التي يمكن توجيهها لهذه الدراسة؟

    يمكن توجيه عدة نقاط نقدية لهذه الدراسة، منها التركيز الكبير على الجوانب البلاغية دون الاهتمام الكافي بالجوانب الأخرى من النقد الأدبي مثل السياق التاريخي والاجتماعي للنصوص، الاعتماد الكبير على المصادر التقليدية دون تقديم تفسير جديد أو مقاربة مبتكرة، والاعتماد على الاقتباسات الطويلة من النصوص الأصلية مما يجعل الدراسة تبدو أحياناً كتلخيص أكثر منها تحليل نقدي.


References used
أسرار البلاغة : عبد القاهر الجرجاني . تح . محمود محمد شاكر ، ط 1، مطبعة المدني ، القاهرة 1991 .
البديع في نقد الشعر : أسامة بن منقذ .تح.د.أحمد بدوي ، د.حامد عبد المجيد . مطبعة مصطفى البابي الحلبي و أولاده ، القاهرة (د.ت).
البلاغة الاصطلاحيّة : عبده عبد العزيز قلقيلة .ط 3، دار الفكر العربي . القاهرة 1992 م.
التشبيه، دراسة في تطوّر المصطلح : إبراهيم عبدالحميد التلب .ط 1، دار الطباعة المحمّدية . القاهرة 1999 م
rate research

Read More

The problem of the Self occupies an important place in the philosophical thought, as the link between two major sections in philosophy: the study of knowledge and the study of existence which has received considerable attention throughout the history of human thought. Philosophers have split into several directions notably the physical, the ideal and the realistic. These attitudes reflected in the opinions and theories of Arab thinkers and philosophers where they treated this matter deeply and accurately, stemming from the nature of their hesitant attitude among the religious and the mental, of whom Fakhr al-Deen al-Razi has devoted to this problem a large area in his compositions. We wonder here about the nature of his attitude and how could he reconcile his philosophical mental bias and the Islamic concept of the self which is based on the axioms of the text?
The aim of this research is to study the concept of history and evolution for “IbnKhaldun” through a systematic illustration of the meaning of history. Therefore, we present this research in order to reach the philosophy of history for “IbnKhaldun” and to highlight the importance of this philosopher as one of the founders of the philosophy of history as his conception of history makes him close to contemporary philosophers. This perception is crystallized to history on rejecting the “empiricalconcept” radically. Therefore, we find that the history of “IbnKhaldun” is not a narrative of news, but it is an explanation of eventsin which we can build it a new science. The concept of progress that was crystallized in the eighteenth century has signs in the introduction of IbnKhaldun in which he presented a methodology for studying history in its interior movement and not in appearance. In addition, the problematic questions that raised by “IbnKhaldun” opened horizons for knowledge and development such as: What is the relationship between historical knowledge and historical writing? Is it possible for history to be part of science? This research also points to the errors of historians, which occur for many complex reasons that might be psychological, social, political and cultural. The errors also may happen because of a lack in knowledge about the laws of nature.
This research is based on deconstructing the mechanism of the hidden system of term, in its analytical applications on the two modes (virility / femininity) in Al-Ghathami's cultural criticism. In order to reveal the problems of this monetary term th at those concerned with cultural criticism in general, or criticism of Al-Ghathami's production in particular. They are problems that can be classified into three types. The first is the paradox / contradiction, which is when there are two texts of Al- Ghathami in one subject, and they are opposite or contradictory, i.e. transcribing one another. The second problem is the problem of play, and it is the text that carries another reading other than the reading of food, which the recipient can memorize through the tools of cultural criticism and its mechanisms themselves. The third type is the problem of sin, which is the text that carries a critical connotation that contradicts and abolishes the cultural criticism mechanism.
This research tackled the attitude of interpretation towards the issue of metaphor, especially the French philosopher's view Paul Ricuor. It also dealt with the nature of metaphor as suggested by him via critiquing the attitude in which he finds a mere aesthetic and substitutive ornament from the one hand, while taking it as innovative means to touch reality on the other hand. Consequently, it is a cognitive value with the aim of contacting the outside world and getting to know it then the research proceeded to discuss the intellectual basics of metaphor according to Ricuor. He noticed that there is no way to understand the nature of metaphor without understanding its basics. This has made it possible to handle the knowledgeable and innovative function of metaphor be it the present side always in language; that which never fades. So, it was not possible to handle metaphor inside language without wondering how thinking works. Here Ricuor differentiates between living and consumed metaphor on the basis of the ability of innovation and knowledge provided by each one of them. Additionally, he has stated that metaphor is there inside interpretation as it is through it. Such a presence of metaphor inside the field of interpretation is the reason why one can tackle this polysemy. This polysemy results in this on the one hand and in its openness on the world of human act; work and practice on the other hand. This way, metaphor in interpretation is presented as a future language. The research has ended up with a bunch of results through questioning the concept of metaphor in a philosophic interpretative way.
As one on of the sciences of the Arabic Language, this research concentrates on the morphological criticism to al-Mutanabbi's poetry by a few ancient Arab critics who were not grammarians. The introduction presents the significance, aim and methodolo gy of the research, then follows the talk of the aspects of the morphological criticism to al-Mutanabbi's poetry through highlighting the beginnings of the morphological and syntactic criticism. Building on this, it mentions the morphologically-criticized line of verse, records the criticism, and assesses this criticism based on the principles of syntax, morphology and the statements of the eloquent Arabs. Eventually, this research addresses the characteristics of this criticism, pointing out that such criticism carries heavy bias against Abu Tayyeb al-Mutanabbi. It neither utters the truth, nor is sincere; but tends to be envious and offensive, being follower of al-Basra school of syntax and morphology, and considering its opponents mistaken and faulty. It then mentions the important results is ends up with.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا