Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Astudy of the different Effect methods for land preparation In productivity indicators for chickpea

دراسة تأثير الأساليب المختلفة لتحضير التربة الزراعية في المؤشرات الإنتاجية لمحصول الحمص

1177   0   22   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2017
  fields Field Crops
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The ways cultivation of soils and preparing of soil are for farming field crops with adding fertilizers village as one of the most important methods of modern agriculture processes. Starting up off this importance. the research was executed in the north east area of Homs city, through the season(2013,2014) by using five ways to cultiveate the soil.

References used
Andraiv H. A.,1956_ ocnovnoe metaditckckck rabota zimladiliaiKol Mo ,420p
Cibrafodov N., 2011_ Cartofilvodo Bod red Bicreva M Kolous, 288p
Davis ,H 2004_ Plant physiology No 217 240p
rate research

Read More

The agricultural land of the experiment was cultivated by different methods of double rotated tillage such as; the turningturning tillage, turning- surface tillage, and turning- hard tillage as well as to control (without tillage). The cultivated land planted with peas مPisum sativum ة was in the western and northern area of Homs province.
A research was conducted in the northern and western area of Homs province using four methods of tillage namely; Surface Disk ploughing, Turning Ploughing, Standard Disk Ploughing, and Chisel Ploughing. The prepared soil resulted of this research was planted with cumin) Cuminum cyminum L.).
There are different impacts of the methods of agricultural soil tillage in agricultural production, the method of the basic methods in farming conditions for plant growth, and increase production, by reducing the negative factors that may be caused by use other methods of tillage.
This this research was Carried out at video cattle and sheep Center of the Department of Animal Production in the College of Agriculture in October University with the beginning of the spring of 2011 in order to study the possibility of bringing cu bes forage replace part of the feed position in the diets of fattening lambs and the impact on their performance, using / 20 / Twenty male strain of Awas ages ranged between 4-5 months and the average weight of 23.5 kg and distributed to four groups to evaluate (in accordance with the decisions of 1996 NRC) the experimental treatments - An increase of waste residue olive trim diets tested in dry matter ingested more than a day for the bush CONTROL but without significant differences. - The daily increase in weight 150- 151 - 144- 134 g C-G1-G2-G3 respectively / day and feed conversion C-G1-G2 9.66-9.80-10.27 respectively were close while the manufacturing efficiency of the transaction G3-11.11 lower compared with the previous three transactions mentioned above, which fell somewhat - Digestible dry matter plants and organic matter for the treatment of G1 was the highest with significant at the level of (0.05> P) compared with treatment G3 table (5), while the digestion of crude protein for the treatment of G3 coefficient was lower compared with the rest of the transactions on the abstract level (0.05> P.) - Digest raw fiber and raw fat transactions G3-G2 coefficient was higher compared with the Control C on the abstract level (0.05> P).
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا