Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAssessment of AquaCrop and CropWat Models in the Simulation of Deficit Irrigation Impact on Cotton Crop
تقييم أداء النموذجين AquaCrop و CropWat في محاكاة تأثير الري الناقص في محصول القطن
2496
5 26
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
أجريت هذه الدراسة بهدف تقييم أداء النموذجين AquaCrop و CropWat في محاكاة تأثير الري الناقص في محصول القطن. عوير النموذجان باستعمال بيانات تجربة حقلية لدراسة تأثير الري النـاقص في محصول القطن لموسم نمو 2007 ، فيما قُيم أداء النموذجين بمقارنة نتائجهمـا لمؤشـري الإنتاجيـة و الاستهلاك المائي (ETc) بقيمهما المقيسة في موسمي 2008 و 2009 .بينت العلاقة بين القيم المقيسة و القيم المتوقعة أن أداء AquaCrop كان أفضل بكثير من أداء CropWat في التنبؤ بتـأثير الإجهـاد المائي في الإنتاجية و ETc ، إذْ كانت قيمة الميل في معادلات الانحدار لـAquaCrop أقرب إلى الواحـد و كانت قيم القاطع صغيرة. كما كانت قيم دليل التوافق (d) بين القيم المقيـسة و القـيم المتوقعـة لكـلا النموذجين قريبة جداً من الواحد، باستثناء قيمته في CropWat في موسم 2009 بالنسبة إلـى ETc . و قد تمكن كلا النموذجين من محاكاة المنحى العام لتغيرات المحتوى المائي للتربة فـي معـاملات الـري المختلفة بصورة جيدة. تشجع نتائج هـذه الدراسـة علـى التحـول مـن اسـتعمال CropWat إلـى AquaCrop لإدارة الري و تخطيطه فهو نموذج تطبيقي يحافظ على التوازن بين دقة النتائج و البساطة.
This study was carried out to compare the performance of the FAO AquaCrop and CropWat models in simulating the effects of deficit irrigation on cotton crop. The models were calibrated using data from the 2007 growing season of a field study conducted to assess deficit irrigation effects on cotton, whereas the models were validated by comparing their outputs for yield and water use (ETc) with the measured values of the two variables in the 2008 and 2009. The relationship between measured and predicted values of yield and ETc revealed that the AquaCrop was better than CropWat in predicting water stress impact on yield and ETc. The linear regression equation for AquaCrop had a small intercept and its slope was very close to unity. The index of agreement (d) was close to one for both models, except its value for ETc in the 2009 year. Both models could reproduce the general trend of the changes in soil water content in the different irrigation levels. Accordingly, the use of AquaCrop instead of CropWat should be encouraged for management and planning of irrigation, since it is a practitioner type model keeps a good balance between output accuracy and simplicity.
References used
Evett, S. R. and J. A. Tolk. (2009). Introduction: Can water use efficiency be modeled well enough to impact crop management? Agron J 101: 423-425
FAO. (1979). Yield response to water by J. Doorenbos and A. Kassam. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome
FAO. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration by Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome
rate research
Read More
Predicting crop yield response to irrigation level is increasingly important to
optimize irrigation under limited available water and for enhancing
sustainability and profitable production. This study was carried out to evaluate
the performance of
CropWat model in predicting deficit irrigation effect on
cotton crop, and to explore some alternatives for cotton irrigation. Crop yield
and water use data were collected from a 3-yr (2007-2009) field experiment to
assess the response of drip-irrigated cotton to deficit irrigation (DI).
This study was carried out on a 17 years Vineyard (Helwani,
Betamooni. Cvs) when the study started. Two deficit irrigation
treatments were studied (%88, 60%), in addition to the control (full irrigation), and each treatment included three replicati
ons. Drip irrigation technique was applied (one irrigation line for each tree line, and eight drippers for each tree). Fruit yield and sugar
percentage were observed under different water treatments.
The present investigation was carried out at the Agricultural Scientific
Research Center in Swieda to study the effect of deficit irrigation on the growth
of four apple seedlings rootstocks genotypes and to estimate their ability to
drought tolera
nce particularly in light of the lack of water sources and no rain.
Two irrigation levels: 100% (control) and 75% of water requirements were
applied. The shoot length, leaves number, leaves area, the distribution of the
roots in soil, the depth of irrigation water in the soil and the consumption of
water in each level were measured. Results showed that irrigation with 75% of
field capacity on studied genotypes caused reduction of shoots length, decline of
leaves number and area and the depth of root comparing with the control.
There were significant differences between studied genotypes in terms of vigor
where the genotypes C and S2 were superior than A and B.
A field experiment was carried out in Hout research station- Agriculture research center in
Swaida – General Commission For Scientific Research Agricultural during the growing
season of 2015-2016 to study the effect of different levels of deficit i
rrigation with
different levels of town refuse compost (TRC)on some morphological parameters and the
productivity of lettuce and compare it with the common mineral fertilizers.
The experiment was designed as a split block design with three levels of irrigation, each
level has four fertilizing treatments and control with three replicates.
The research has studied the plant height (H), the number of its leaves (N) ,the leaf area
(LAL), the plant's leaves area (LAP), the leaves area index (LAI), in addition to the lettuce
head's fresh weight and the total productivity of the planted area.
The irrigation and fertilizing interaction results indicate to the obvious positive effect of
the organic additions on the productivity parameters and the efficiency of deficit irrigation,
and the significant superiority of T11 treatment in all of the measured parameters in
compare with the other treatments with an increased final yield of %169 comparing with
T15 and % 428 comparing with T35.
The results also indicate to the possibility of saving %25 of the consumed amount of
irrigation water by using TRC instead of mineral fertilizer , and reveal that the organicmineral
combination achieved a better yield with percentages of ( 29- 44 – 53 )%
comparing with single mineral fertilizer in the three studied irrigation levels (T1-T2-T3)
respectively.
These results give the farmer a wide range of possibilities to choose what suits his
available productivity needs , and a clear idea about the expected yield according to the
chosen treatment.
This study considers the efficiency of irrigation water usage in the
economic and productive aspects of peanuts crop in Syrian lands, in
particular: mid, coastal and eastern lands, in terms of arithmetic
means during the period of 2010-2012.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
