Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Assessment of AquaCrop and CropWat Models in the Simulation of Deficit Irrigation Impact on Cotton Crop

تقييم أداء النموذجين AquaCrop و CropWat في محاكاة تأثير الري الناقص في محصول القطن

2792   6   26   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2011
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

This study was carried out to compare the performance of the FAO AquaCrop and CropWat models in simulating the effects of deficit irrigation on cotton crop. The models were calibrated using data from the 2007 growing season of a field study conducted to assess deficit irrigation effects on cotton, whereas the models were validated by comparing their outputs for yield and water use (ETc) with the measured values of the two variables in the 2008 and 2009. The relationship between measured and predicted values of yield and ETc revealed that the AquaCrop was better than CropWat in predicting water stress impact on yield and ETc. The linear regression equation for AquaCrop had a small intercept and its slope was very close to unity. The index of agreement (d) was close to one for both models, except its value for ETc in the 2009 year. Both models could reproduce the general trend of the changes in soil water content in the different irrigation levels. Accordingly, the use of AquaCrop instead of CropWat should be encouraged for management and planning of irrigation, since it is a practitioner type model keeps a good balance between output accuracy and simplicity.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
تتناول هذه الدراسة تقييم أداء نموذجي AquaCrop و CropWat في محاكاة تأثير الري الناقص على محصول القطن. تم معايرة النموذجين باستخدام بيانات موسم النمو لعام 2007، وتم التحقق من صحة النتائج بمقارنة الإنتاجية والاستهلاك المائي (ETc) بالقيم المقيسة في موسمي 2008 و2009. أظهرت النتائج أن أداء AquaCrop كان أفضل بكثير من CropWat في التنبؤ بتأثير الإجهاد المائي على الإنتاجية وETc، حيث كانت معادلات الانحدار الخطي لـ AquaCrop ذات ميل قريب من الواحد وقيم القاطع صغيرة. كما كانت قيم دليل التوافق (d) بين القيم المقيسة والمتوقعة قريبة جداً من الواحد، باستثناء قيمة ETc في CropWat لموسم 2009. تمكن كلا النموذجين من محاكاة المنحى العام لتغيرات المحتوى المائي للتربة في معاملات الري المختلفة بصورة جيدة. تشجع نتائج هذه الدراسة على التحول من استخدام CropWat إلى AquaCrop في إدارة الري وتخطيطه، نظراً لدقته وبساطته.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: على الرغم من أن الدراسة قدمت نتائج مهمة حول أداء نموذجي AquaCrop و CropWat، إلا أنها لم تتناول بعض الجوانب الهامة مثل تأثير التغيرات المناخية المستقبلية على أداء النموذجين. كما أن الدراسة اعتمدت على بيانات من منطقة واحدة فقط، مما قد يحد من تعميم النتائج على مناطق أخرى ذات ظروف مناخية وتربوية مختلفة. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، كان من الممكن أن تكون الدراسة أكثر شمولية إذا تم تضمين تحليل اقتصادي لتكاليف وفوائد استخدام كل من النموذجين في إدارة الري.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو الهدف الرئيسي من الدراسة؟

    الهدف الرئيسي من الدراسة هو تقييم أداء نموذجي AquaCrop و CropWat في محاكاة تأثير الري الناقص على محصول القطن.

  2. ما هي البيانات التي استخدمت لمعايرة النموذجين؟

    تم استخدام بيانات موسم النمو لعام 2007 لمعايرة النموذجين، وتم التحقق من صحة النتائج بمقارنة الإنتاجية والاستهلاك المائي بالقيم المقيسة في موسمي 2008 و2009.

  3. أي النموذجين كان أفضل في التنبؤ بتأثير الإجهاد المائي على الإنتاجية وETc؟

    كان نموذج AquaCrop أفضل بكثير من CropWat في التنبؤ بتأثير الإجهاد المائي على الإنتاجية وETc.

  4. ما هي التوصية الرئيسية التي توصلت إليها الدراسة؟

    تشجع الدراسة على التحول من استخدام CropWat إلى AquaCrop في إدارة الري وتخطيطه، نظراً لدقته وبساطته.


References used
Evett, S. R. and J. A. Tolk. (2009). Introduction: Can water use efficiency be modeled well enough to impact crop management? Agron J 101: 423-425
FAO. (1979). Yield response to water by J. Doorenbos and A. Kassam. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome
FAO. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration by Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome
rate research

Read More

Predicting crop yield response to irrigation level is increasingly important to optimize irrigation under limited available water and for enhancing sustainability and profitable production. This study was carried out to evaluate the performance of CropWat model in predicting deficit irrigation effect on cotton crop, and to explore some alternatives for cotton irrigation. Crop yield and water use data were collected from a 3-yr (2007-2009) field experiment to assess the response of drip-irrigated cotton to deficit irrigation (DI).
This study was carried out on a 17 years Vineyard (Helwani, Betamooni. Cvs) when the study started. Two deficit irrigation treatments were studied (%88, 60%), in addition to the control (full irrigation), and each treatment included three replicati ons. Drip irrigation technique was applied (one irrigation line for each tree line, and eight drippers for each tree). Fruit yield and sugar percentage were observed under different water treatments.
The present investigation was carried out at the Agricultural Scientific Research Center in Swieda to study the effect of deficit irrigation on the growth of four apple seedlings rootstocks genotypes and to estimate their ability to drought tolera nce particularly in light of the lack of water sources and no rain. Two irrigation levels: 100% (control) and 75% of water requirements were applied. The shoot length, leaves number, leaves area, the distribution of the roots in soil, the depth of irrigation water in the soil and the consumption of water in each level were measured. Results showed that irrigation with 75% of field capacity on studied genotypes caused reduction of shoots length, decline of leaves number and area and the depth of root comparing with the control. There were significant differences between studied genotypes in terms of vigor where the genotypes C and S2 were superior than A and B.
A field experiment was carried out in Hout research station- Agriculture research center in Swaida – General Commission For Scientific Research Agricultural during the growing season of 2015-2016 to study the effect of different levels of deficit i rrigation with different levels of town refuse compost (TRC)on some morphological parameters and the productivity of lettuce and compare it with the common mineral fertilizers. The experiment was designed as a split block design with three levels of irrigation, each level has four fertilizing treatments and control with three replicates. The research has studied the plant height (H), the number of its leaves (N) ,the leaf area (LAL), the plant's leaves area (LAP), the leaves area index (LAI), in addition to the lettuce head's fresh weight and the total productivity of the planted area. The irrigation and fertilizing interaction results indicate to the obvious positive effect of the organic additions on the productivity parameters and the efficiency of deficit irrigation, and the significant superiority of T11 treatment in all of the measured parameters in compare with the other treatments with an increased final yield of %169 comparing with T15 and % 428 comparing with T35. The results also indicate to the possibility of saving %25 of the consumed amount of irrigation water by using TRC instead of mineral fertilizer , and reveal that the organicmineral combination achieved a better yield with percentages of ( 29- 44 – 53 )% comparing with single mineral fertilizer in the three studied irrigation levels (T1-T2-T3) respectively. These results give the farmer a wide range of possibilities to choose what suits his available productivity needs , and a clear idea about the expected yield according to the chosen treatment.
This study considers the efficiency of irrigation water usage in the economic and productive aspects of peanuts crop in Syrian lands, in particular: mid, coastal and eastern lands, in terms of arithmetic means during the period of 2010-2012.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا