Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The Principle Of Jurisdiction Over Jurisdiction In International Arbitration

مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص في التحكيم الدولي

3252   3   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2021
  fields Law
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The principle of the arbitral tribunal’s competence by adjudicating the validity of its jurisdiction, known as the principle of competence by jurisdiction is one of the most important principles in the framework of international arbitration and one of the most accurate. This principle has sparked many controversies despite its almost complete recognition of contemporary legal systems related to arbitration. Directly for the independence of the arbitration clause from the original contract, and the issue of transferring jurisdiction from formal courts to the agreement courts is one of the most important positive effects of the arbitration clause, as the arbitration tribunal replaces the judiciary in settling the dispute subject of the agreement, so there may not be a judicial vacuum as a result of giving up The judiciary is not performing its role, but rather it is replaced by the consensual judiciary chosen by the parties to adjudicate their dispute. The researcher relied on the descriptive and analytical approach of the legal texts and articles related to the principle of jurisdiction over the jurisdiction, the researcher reached many results, the most prominent of which were: The Syrian Arbitration Law approved the principle of competence with jurisdiction, where the Control Panel decides on the defenses related to its lack of jurisdiction, including the defenses related to the absence of an arbitration agreement or Its fall, nullity, or lack of inclusion of the subject of the dispute, and the positive effect of the principle of jurisdiction over jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the arbitration judiciary in deciding on the issue of its jurisdiction alone, so that the state’s jurisdiction is not expected to be granted this power and the negative effect of adopting the principle of jurisdiction is the jurisdiction before state courts, where it is required that These courts shall refrain from considering or broadcasting any lawsuit that creates the arbitration clause or its validity, or directly on the subject of the dispute despite the apparent validity of this condition before the arbitrators say their word in it.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
يتناول البحث مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص في التحكيم الدولي، وهو المبدأ الذي يمنح هيئة التحكيم صلاحية الفصل في مسألة اختصاصها. يعتبر هذا المبدأ من أهم المبادئ في إطار التحكيم الدولي، وقد أثار الكثير من الجدل رغم الاعتراف الشبه الكامل به في الأنظمة القانونية المعاصرة. يعتمد المبدأ على استقلالية شرط التحكيم عن العقد الأصلي، ويهدف إلى نقل الولاية القضائية من المحاكم الرسمية إلى المحاكم الاتفاقية، مما يضمن عدم وجود فراغ قضائي. استخدمت الباحثة المنهج الوصفي التحليلي لدراسة النصوص والمواد القانونية المتعلقة بالمبدأ، وتوصلت إلى أن قانون التحكيم السوري أقر هذا المبدأ، حيث تفصل هيئة التحكيم في الدفوع المتعلقة بعدم اختصاصها بما في ذلك الدفوع المتعلقة بعدم وجود اتفاق تحكيم أو سقوطه أو بطلانه أو بعدم شموله لموضوع النزاع. يحقق المبدأ فوائد عديدة منها سرعة الإجراءات والسرية في المعاملات التجارية. كما أن المبدأ يعزز الثقة في نظام التحكيم ويمنع التحايل من قبل الأطراف السيئة النية. اقترحت الباحثة تطوير النصوص القانونية السورية المتعلقة بالتحكيم والانضمام إلى معاهدات دولية جديدة بما يتوافق مع سيادة الدولة.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: على الرغم من أهمية البحث وتناوله لموضوع حيوي في مجال التحكيم الدولي، إلا أنه يمكن توجيه بعض الملاحظات النقدية. أولاً، البحث يركز بشكل كبير على الجانب النظري دون تقديم أمثلة عملية كافية لتوضيح تطبيقات المبدأ في الواقع. ثانياً، قد يكون من المفيد تضمين مقارنة بين التشريعات السورية وتشريعات دول أخرى لتقديم رؤية أوسع وشاملة. ثالثاً، الاقتراحات المقدمة لتطوير النصوص القانونية السورية قد تكون عامة بعض الشيء، وكان من الممكن تقديم توصيات أكثر تحديداً ووضوحاً. وأخيراً، البحث لم يتناول بشكل كافٍ التحديات التي قد تواجه تطبيق هذا المبدأ في السياق السوري، خاصة في ظل الظروف الحالية.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص في التحكيم الدولي؟

    مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص هو المبدأ الذي يمنح هيئة التحكيم صلاحية الفصل في مسألة اختصاصها، بما في ذلك الدفوع المتعلقة بعدم وجود اتفاق تحكيم أو سقوطه أو بطلانه أو بعدم شموله لموضوع النزاع.

  2. ما هي الفوائد التي يحققها مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص؟

    يحقق المبدأ فوائد عديدة منها سرعة الإجراءات، السرية في المعاملات التجارية، تعزيز الثقة في نظام التحكيم، ومنع التحايل من قبل الأطراف السيئة النية.

  3. كيف يعزز مبدأ الاختصاص بالاختصاص الثقة في نظام التحكيم؟

    يعزز المبدأ الثقة في نظام التحكيم من خلال منح هيئة التحكيم صلاحية الفصل في مسألة اختصاصها، مما يمنع الأطراف السيئة النية من التحايل على القانون وتعطيل عملية التحكيم.

  4. ما هي الاقتراحات المقدمة لتطوير النصوص القانونية السورية المتعلقة بالتحكيم؟

    اقترحت الباحثة تطوير النصوص القانونية السورية بما يتوافق مع الأنظمة الداخلية الوطنية وبما لا يخل بسيادة الدولة، وتطوير قانون التحكيم بشكل دوري لمواكبة التطورات في التجارة الدولية، ودراسة الانضمام إلى معاهدات واتفاقيات دولية جديدة.


References used
Fatima, Hashemi (2018). Effects of an Arbitration Agreement (Comparative Study). Master Thesis. University of Dr. Moulay Taher, Algeria.
rate research

Read More

We dealt with in this research, Jurisdiction of arbitrators in determining arbitral proceedings. We presented the extent to which the arbitral tribunal was free to choose procedural law and how to choose procedural rules. We have also been exposed to restrictions on the arbitral tribunal's freedom to determine procedural law.
Several principles are taken into account in the preparation of the general budget, some of them is to respect the organization of the general budget so as to ensure the right of the people and their representatives to be aware of it and monitor it s implementation in an easy way, and also to respect the time duration, the general budget needs to be prepared. The respect for these principles allow giving the legislative authority a greater control of the executive authority activity in the finance field. It also reflects the desire to give the resolution and the clarity to the document of general budget in order to reflect clearly the financial situation of the state. With the development of the concept of the state, its role, and the general budget, many countries have begun to abandon the commitment to these principles. Actually, this was not to give up entirely but it was limited in most cases to adopt a more flexible application of the principles referred to. Thus, the implementation of these principles and the adherence to them has become the subject of a significant difference between the public finance scholars. Therefore , some bodies criticize it, and others defend it, and present their arguments. The most important principles are: the principle of inclusiveness and unity. The principle of unity aims at preparing one document for the state budget, and represent its external frame. The principle of inclusiveness aims at filling this frame through a detailed registry of each estimation of the expenses and revenues without the offset between them, and therefore, it represents the internal content of the principle of unity. We chose this topic because of the close link between them and the importance of observance, as well as most countries commit to them. The study aimed at defining these principles, their justifications, and discussing the link between them, criticism, the exceptions, as well as the fundamental differences between them, and the research results.
We dealt with in this research, the subject of Arbitrator's authority in the control of the arbitration agreement, And our offer controls that jurisdiction, in terms of the legal basis for him. Pena also the effects of the jurisdiction of the arbi tral tribunal in the control of the arbitration agreement, In terms of the content of this jurisdiction and scope.
On the one hand, the principle “fraud unravels all” is one of the most important principles in the civil law, because of the law doesn’t protect the person who act in bad faith. On the other hand, the independence principle is the most important p rinciple in the letter of credit. Which that principle means: the bank’s obligation to pay is separated from the underlying contract’s performance, and the bank must honor the credit if the beneficiary presents the compliant bills of documents, as well as the beneficiary is protected from the risks of non-payment. So, what is the influence of the fraud on the independence principle. That is what we are going to discover.
The research aims to specify the impact of the disclosure and transparency principle on the financial performance of the private banks. The researcher has used the descriptive analytical method. The data collection has been based on the questionnaire , where the researcher had distributed 200 questionnaires to the CEOs, their deputies, their assistants, financial directors and internal auditors of 14 banks listed on the Damascus Stock Exchange. 190 questionnaires have been retrieved, including 15 incomplete questionnaires and 175 analyzable ones. The researcher has analyzed the data using the SPSS 20 statistical analyses program. The research has concluded that the application of disclosure and transparency effects on the financial performance of the private banks under study. The research came out with a set of recommendation the most essential of which is that enhancing the applying of the disclosure and transparency principle due to its positive role in improving the financial performance in the banks.

suggested questions

comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا