Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The fraud as an exception to independence principle in letter of credit

الغش كاستثناء على مبدأ استقلال الالتزامات في الاعتماد المستندي (دراسة قانونية مقارنة)

2586   6   84   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2016
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

On the one hand, the principle “fraud unravels all” is one of the most important principles in the civil law, because of the law doesn’t protect the person who act in bad faith. On the other hand, the independence principle is the most important principle in the letter of credit. Which that principle means: the bank’s obligation to pay is separated from the underlying contract’s performance, and the bank must honor the credit if the beneficiary presents the compliant bills of documents, as well as the beneficiary is protected from the risks of non-payment. So, what is the influence of the fraud on the independence principle. That is what we are going to discover.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
تناقش هذه الدراسة القانونية مبدأ استقلال الالتزامات في الاعتماد المستندي وكيفية تأثير الغش على هذا المبدأ. الاعتماد المستندي هو وسيلة لضمان حقوق الأطراف في التجارة الدولية، حيث يلتزم المصرف بالدفع للبائع عند تقديم المستندات المطلوبة. ومع ذلك، يمكن للبائعين سيئي النية استغلال هذا النظام عن طريق تقديم مستندات مزورة أو عدم تنفيذ التزاماتهم بشكل صحيح. تهدف الدراسة إلى تسليط الضوء على مدى إمكانية تطبيق مبدأ 'الغش يُفسد كل شيء' على الاعتماد المستندي، مما يسمح للمشتري بطلب إيقاف تنفيذ الاعتماد في حالة الغش. تعتمد الدراسة على المنهج التحليلي المقارن، حيث تم تحليل القواعد الأساسية في القانون المدني والأعراف الموحدة للاعتمادات المستندية، ومقارنة أساليب بعض الدول في معالجة هذا الموضوع. تنقسم الدراسة إلى مبحثين: الأول يتناول مفهوم الاعتماد المستندي ومظاهر استقلال الالتزامات، والثاني يتناول استثناء الغش في الاعتماد المستندي. تتناول الدراسة أيضاً أهمية اكتشاف الغش قبل تنفيذ المصرف لالتزامه، وتأثير الغش الصادر من الغير على الاعتماد المستندي. توصلت الدراسة إلى أن مبدأ 'الغش يُفسد كل شيء' يمكن تطبيقه على الاعتماد المستندي، مع الحفاظ على حقوق الأطراف حسني النية.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: تعتبر هذه الدراسة شاملة ومفصلة في تناولها لموضوع الغش في الاعتماد المستندي وتأثيره على مبدأ استقلال الالتزامات. ومع ذلك، يمكن القول أن الدراسة قد تكون أكثر فعالية إذا تضمنت أمثلة عملية وحالات دراسية من الواقع لتوضيح النقاط النظرية بشكل أفضل. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يمكن أن تكون الدراسة أكثر شمولية إذا تناولت تأثير التكنولوجيا الحديثة والتجارة الإلكترونية على الاعتماد المستندي والغش المرتبط بها. كما أن الدراسة قد تستفيد من تحليل أعمق للقوانين المحلية والدولية المتعلقة بالغش في الاعتماد المستندي وتقديم توصيات محددة لتحسين الأطر القانونية الحالية.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو مبدأ استقلال الالتزامات في الاعتماد المستندي؟

    مبدأ استقلال الالتزامات يعني أن التزام المصرف بالدفع للبائع مستقل عن عقد البيع بين البائع والمشتري، ويجب على المصرف الوفاء بالتزامه عند تقديم المستندات المطلوبة بغض النظر عن أي نزاعات بين البائع والمشتري.

  2. كيف يمكن للبائعين سيئي النية استغلال نظام الاعتماد المستندي؟

    يمكن للبائعين سيئي النية استغلال نظام الاعتماد المستندي عن طريق تقديم مستندات مزورة أو عدم تنفيذ التزاماتهم بشكل صحيح، مثل عدم إرسال البضاعة أو إرسالها معيبة، بهدف الحصول على قيمة الاعتماد دون حق.

  3. ما هو تأثير اكتشاف الغش قبل تنفيذ المصرف لالتزامه؟

    إذا تم اكتشاف الغش قبل تنفيذ المصرف لالتزامه، يمكن للمشتري طلب إيقاف تنفيذ الاعتماد أو الحجز عليه، مما يمنع المصرف من الوفاء بالتزامه تجاه البائع سيء النية.

  4. ما هي التوصيات التي قدمتها الدراسة لتحسين الأطر القانونية المتعلقة بالغش في الاعتماد المستندي؟

    توصي الدراسة بتقنين قواعد خاصة بموضوع الاحتيال في الاعتماد المستندي، وتهيئة الكوادر المتخصصة قانونياً في الاعتماد المستندي والتجارة الدولية، وتفعيل دور شركات المراقبة وجعل الشهادات الصادرة عنها متطلباً أساسياً لتراخيص الاستيراد.


References used
Gao Xiang and Ross P.Buckley,2003 A comparative Analysis of the standard of fraud required under The fraud rule in letter of credit, Duke Journal of Comparative & international law, Vol 13: 2003,P.293-P.336
MERAL,N, 2012, The fraud exception in documentary credits-a global analysis, Ankara Bar Review, Vol. 2012-2, P.41-P.76
Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits 2007 Revision (UCP 600), 2007 International Chamber of commerce
rate research

Read More

The documentary credit is one of the most effective means of settling of international trade payments. This is when the beneficiary submits documents in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit.
International trade contracts are considered one of the most important topics of international law, because they are reflected on the economies of all countries, and that they are of the successive contracts, where goods take time to cross the border s of more than one country, which makes them exposed to risks. And since the documentary credit is one of the international trade contracts for its role in providing guarantee for the international sales, It is also one of the most capable means that the modern era has known in contributing to the completion of international trade deals, one the most important banking operations in the world, one of the most used tools of payment in international trade, and for its success as a fast-performing and low-cost tool, and since the documentary credit contract has a number of stages until it reaches its goal, this process may be hampered by unexpected events that are independent of the will of the debtor and affect the implementation making it either impossible as force majeure, or exhausting for debtor while remaining possible; as emergency circumstance.
The justice authority is one of the three basic authorities in any country ,and it is the essential Guarantor for the individual's and group's rights ,and to apply law constituted by specific authority ,which represents the public desire perfectly .however, we can't just talk about justice authority independency, we must set criteria and Guarantees to protect that independency ,in order to provide justice ,solve conflicts and protect personal rights and freedom, this discourse talks about judges independency, vocational guarantees to let them do their work in the best way according to what their duty requires to achieve law prevalence with no restriction or hindrance.
Several principles are taken into account in the preparation of the general budget, some of them is to respect the organization of the general budget so as to ensure the right of the people and their representatives to be aware of it and monitor it s implementation in an easy way, and also to respect the time duration, the general budget needs to be prepared. The respect for these principles allow giving the legislative authority a greater control of the executive authority activity in the finance field. It also reflects the desire to give the resolution and the clarity to the document of general budget in order to reflect clearly the financial situation of the state. With the development of the concept of the state, its role, and the general budget, many countries have begun to abandon the commitment to these principles. Actually, this was not to give up entirely but it was limited in most cases to adopt a more flexible application of the principles referred to. Thus, the implementation of these principles and the adherence to them has become the subject of a significant difference between the public finance scholars. Therefore , some bodies criticize it, and others defend it, and present their arguments. The most important principles are: the principle of inclusiveness and unity. The principle of unity aims at preparing one document for the state budget, and represent its external frame. The principle of inclusiveness aims at filling this frame through a detailed registry of each estimation of the expenses and revenues without the offset between them, and therefore, it represents the internal content of the principle of unity. We chose this topic because of the close link between them and the importance of observance, as well as most countries commit to them. The study aimed at defining these principles, their justifications, and discussing the link between them, criticism, the exceptions, as well as the fundamental differences between them, and the research results.
The principle of the arbitral tribunal’s competence by adjudicating the validity of its jurisdiction, known as the principle of competence by jurisdiction is one of the most important principles in the framework of international arbitration and one o f the most accurate. This principle has sparked many controversies despite its almost complete recognition of contemporary legal systems related to arbitration. Directly for the independence of the arbitration clause from the original contract, and the issue of transferring jurisdiction from formal courts to the agreement courts is one of the most important positive effects of the arbitration clause, as the arbitration tribunal replaces the judiciary in settling the dispute subject of the agreement, so there may not be a judicial vacuum as a result of giving up The judiciary is not performing its role, but rather it is replaced by the consensual judiciary chosen by the parties to adjudicate their dispute. The researcher relied on the descriptive and analytical approach of the legal texts and articles related to the principle of jurisdiction over the jurisdiction, the researcher reached many results, the most prominent of which were: The Syrian Arbitration Law approved the principle of competence with jurisdiction, where the Control Panel decides on the defenses related to its lack of jurisdiction, including the defenses related to the absence of an arbitration agreement or Its fall, nullity, or lack of inclusion of the subject of the dispute, and the positive effect of the principle of jurisdiction over jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the arbitration judiciary in deciding on the issue of its jurisdiction alone, so that the state’s jurisdiction is not expected to be granted this power and the negative effect of adopting the principle of jurisdiction is the jurisdiction before state courts, where it is required that These courts shall refrain from considering or broadcasting any lawsuit that creates the arbitration clause or its validity, or directly on the subject of the dispute despite the apparent validity of this condition before the arbitrators say their word in it.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا