Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userJurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal to determine the procedural law of the arbitration dispute
سلطة هيئة التحكيم في تحديد القانون الإجرائي لدعوى التحكيم
1587
0 13
0
(
0
)
Added by
Aِl-Baath University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2018
fields
Law
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تناولنا في هذا البحث, سلطة هيئة التحكيم في تحديد القانون الإجرائي لدعوى التحكيم, فعرضنا لمدى حرية هيئة التحكيم في اختيار القانون الإجرائي و كيفية اختيارها للقواعد الإجرائية. كما تعرضنا ايضا للقيود الواردة على حرية هيئة التحكيم في مجال تحديد القانون الإجرائي, و موقف المشروع السوري في هذا الشأن.
We dealt with in this research, Jurisdiction of arbitrators in determining arbitral proceedings. We presented the extent to which the arbitral tribunal was free to choose procedural law and how to choose procedural rules. We have also been exposed to restrictions on the arbitral tribunal's freedom to determine procedural law.
References used
Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter, Law and practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Fourth Edition, 2004
Fouchard, Gaillard and Goldman, International Commercial Arbitration, Edited by Emmonuel Gaillard, John Sevage, Kluwer Law International, 1999
Helena Carlquist, Party Autonomy and the choice of Substantive Law in International Commercial Arbitration, Master Thesis, Department of Law, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gotebord University, 2006
rate research
Read More
The principle of the arbitral tribunal’s competence by adjudicating the validity of its jurisdiction, known as the principle of competence by jurisdiction is one of the most important principles in the framework of international arbitration and one o
f the most accurate. This principle has sparked many controversies despite its almost complete recognition of contemporary legal systems related to arbitration. Directly for the independence of the arbitration clause from the original contract, and the issue of transferring jurisdiction from formal courts to the agreement courts is one of the most important positive effects of the arbitration clause, as the arbitration tribunal replaces the judiciary in settling the dispute subject of the agreement, so there may not be a judicial vacuum as a result of giving up The judiciary is not performing its role, but rather it is replaced by the consensual judiciary chosen by the parties to adjudicate their dispute. The researcher relied on the descriptive and analytical approach of the legal texts and articles related to the principle of jurisdiction over the jurisdiction, the researcher reached many results, the most prominent of which were: The Syrian Arbitration Law approved the principle of competence with jurisdiction, where the Control Panel decides on the defenses related to its lack of jurisdiction, including the defenses related to the absence of an arbitration agreement or Its fall, nullity, or lack of inclusion of the subject of the dispute, and the positive effect of the principle of jurisdiction over jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the arbitration judiciary in deciding on the issue of its jurisdiction alone, so that the state’s jurisdiction is not expected to be granted this power and the negative effect of adopting the principle of jurisdiction is the jurisdiction before state courts, where it is required that These courts shall refrain from considering or broadcasting any lawsuit that creates the arbitration clause or its validity, or directly on the subject of the dispute despite the apparent validity of this condition before the arbitrators say their word in it.
We dealt with in this research, the subject of Arbitrator's
authority in the control of the arbitration agreement, And our offer
controls that jurisdiction, in terms of the legal basis for him. Pena
also the effects of the jurisdiction of the arbi
tral tribunal in the
control of the arbitration agreement, In terms of the content of this
jurisdiction and scope.
The general rule of responsibility in modern legislation is that every
fault causes harm to others, oblige the perpetrator to make
reparation. But the absolute application of this rule will cause
reluctance of the judge's decision dictated by his
conscience and
will lead to the judge's preoccupation with his main work, which is
the separation of disputes, to defend himself in the cases that may
be raised by the opponents. However, the litigants can not be held
accountable for their impartiality and their proper application of the
law. Therefore, the legislator has given the litigants the right to hold
the judge accountable through a case of dissent.
nationality legal system that does not concern only the state but rather a means to
determine the population element where and is for human tool set for the distribution of
individuals internationally between states and political units, is consider
ed sexual For
individuals a personal right for those who enjoy it depends upon designate the amount of
the rights enjoyed by and dependent upon appointment Applicable law, so it is necessary
that the individual is attributed to the state of the world and the associated Association of
nationality and of his interests and his right to defend this status and required the state to
recognize him out and respected, is linked to nationality law problem of conflict of
nationalities, both dual citizenship when he enjoys the individual more than one
nationality, and statelessness in the case do not enjoy any individual nationality and we
will in our study, both the problem of the conflict of nationalities and their effects on the
individual and the state and the community international.
انعدام الجنسية
الجنسية
تنازع الجنسيات
ازدواج الجنسية
جنسية القاضي
الجنسية الفعلية
مبدأ حرية الدولة و استقلالها بتنظيم جنسيتها
nationality
conflict of nationalities
dual nationality and statelessness
the nationality of the judge
the actual citizenship
the principle of freedom and independence of the state to organize their nationality
المزيد..
the research aim to determine what is the electronic arbitration as a term
and concept and then the understanding of substantive and
procedural legal aspects, all this as the way to resolve electronic
commerce disputes.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
