Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userInternational competition between the major powers the US-Russian relations model
التنافس الدولي بين القوى الكبرى العلاقات الروسية – الأمريكية نموذجاً
1490
0 34
0
(
0
)
Added by
Aِl-Baath University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2015
fields
Law
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
شهدت العلاقات الدولية تغيرات كبرى بعد انهيار الاتحاد السوفيتي، و بروز الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية كقطب أوحد متحكّم بمصير العلاقات الدولية، و كان تأثير هذه التغيرات كبيرا على روسيا الاتحادية وريثة الاتحاد السوفيتي، إذ عانت ضغوطات دولية مستمرة لتطويقها و عزلها و التحكّم بمصيرها، لكنها لم تقف مكتوفة الأيدي أما هذه الضغوطات، و استطاعت بفضل مجموعة من المتغيرات و الإجراءات السياسية و الاقتصادية النهوض مجدداً و استعادة دورها كدولة لها وزنها في العالم.
International relations have witnessed great changes after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the emergence of the United States pole sole controlled the fate of international relations, and the impact of these changes significant to the Russian Federation and the heir of the Soviet Union, as experienced international pressure continuing to encircle and isolate and control their own destiny, but it did not stand idle in front of this pressures, and was able, thanks to a set of political and economic variables and procedures for the Advancement again and restore its role as her weight in the world.
Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
تناقش الورقة البحثية التغيرات التي طرأت على العلاقات الدولية بعد انهيار الاتحاد السوفيتي، وظهور الولايات المتحدة كقوة عظمى وحيدة. تركز الورقة على العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية، وكيف تأثرت هذه العلاقات بالتغيرات السياسية والاقتصادية منذ عام 1991 وحتى الوقت الحاضر. تستعرض الورقة الفترة من 1991 إلى 1999، حيث كانت العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية تتسم بالتعاون أكثر من الصراع، ثم تنتقل إلى الفترة بعد عام 2000، حيث بدأت العلاقات تتجه نحو التنافس والصراع، خاصة بعد أحداث 11 سبتمبر 2001. تناقش الورقة أيضاً الملفات المحرضة على الصراع بين البلدين، مثل توسيع حلف الناتو، وبرنامج الدرع الصاروخية، والقضية الجورجية، والملف النووي الإيراني، والأزمة الأوكرانية. في الختام، تتناول الورقة مستقبل العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية، وتخلص إلى أن هذه العلاقات ستبقى متوترة على المدى الطويل، مع احتمالية استمرار التنافس والصراع بين البلدين.
Critical review
تقدم الورقة البحثية تحليلاً شاملاً للعلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية، ولكنها تفتقر إلى بعض الجوانب النقدية المهمة. على سبيل المثال، لم تتناول الورقة بشكل كافٍ تأثير العوامل الداخلية في كل من روسيا والولايات المتحدة على تطور هذه العلاقات. كما أن الورقة تركز بشكل كبير على الجانب السياسي والعسكري، وتغفل الجوانب الاقتصادية والثقافية التي قد تكون لها تأثيرات كبيرة على العلاقات بين البلدين. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، كان من الممكن أن تستفيد الورقة من تحليل أعمق للسياسات الخارجية لكل من روسيا والولايات المتحدة وكيفية تأثيرها على النظام الدولي بشكل عام.
Questions related to the research
-
ما هي الفترات الزمنية التي تناولتها الورقة في تحليل العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية؟
تناولت الورقة الفترة من 1991 إلى 1999، ثم الفترة بعد عام 2000 وحتى الوقت الحاضر.
-
ما هي الملفات المحرضة على الصراع بين روسيا والولايات المتحدة التي ناقشتها الورقة؟
ناقشت الورقة ملفات توسيع حلف الناتو، وبرنامج الدرع الصاروخية، والقضية الجورجية، والملف النووي الإيراني، والأزمة الأوكرانية.
-
كيف تأثرت العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية بعد أحداث 11 سبتمبر 2001؟
بعد أحداث 11 سبتمبر 2001، بدأت العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية تتجه نحو التنافس والصراع، حيث نظرت الولايات المتحدة إلى روسيا بعين الريبة، وزادت التوترات بين البلدين.
-
ما هو مستقبل العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية وفقاً للورقة البحثية؟
تتوقع الورقة أن تبقى العلاقات الروسية - الأمريكية متوترة على المدى الطويل، مع احتمالية استمرار التنافس والصراع بين البلدين.
References used
(LaRouche, Jr., «And Now, a Year Later,» LaRouche in 2004: Special Report (February 2002
(W. Phillips Shively, Power and Choice: An Introduction to Political Science, 10thed (Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2007
rate research
Read More
The study addressed the Iranian – Turkish relations after the cold war and focused on
the most important interactions and trans formations takin, place between the two states in
light of the international, regional and internal developments.
The s
tudy also analyzed the dialectic cooperation-competition which takes control of
the track of Iranian-Turkish relationship since the end of the cold war as it identified the
cooperation and competition factors between the two states in the three environments
(internal, regional and international).
The study found that the Iranian – Turkish relations have directly been affected by
the end of the cold war when the collapse of the Soviet Union led to building up the
regional role and political influence of the two states in the Middle East and central Asia in
an effort to get the major regional power status in the regional system.
The study found that the Iranian – Turkish relations have directly been affected by
the end of the cold war when the collapse of the Soviet Union led to building up the
regional role and political influence of the two states in the Middle East and central Asia in
an effort to get the major regional power status in the regional system.
Russian-Iranian relations began crystallize and expand significantly after the
end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, but
these relations seemed cautious in the beginning, despite the existence of
common interests
between both countries represented to strengthen Iran's
military and economic capabilities, Russia considered as a supportive partner
in this field, in addition to nuclear cooperation where Russia was the only
country that has not been subject to pressure from the United States and
accepted the signing of the contract for the establishment of the Iranian
nuclear reactor, In contrast, Russia has considered these relationships an
opportunity to improve its economy, which suffered a strong tremor after the
disintegration of the Soviet Union.
The existence of the Arabs in Africa extends deeply in history. In fact, there are many theorems to trace when Arabs arrived at Africa. These theorems vary depending on the way we want to define who Arabs are. In addition, the humanitarians' dimensio
ns in international relations are in themselves rather vague because such interpretation is not agreed upon in both western and international law especially in relation to Arab and African situations.
There is no doubt that international relations, especially neighbourhood relations, are not as they are supposed to be. In fact, these relations are completely oriented by
maintaining interest, ignoring morals, which results in replacing intimacy with resentment.
It is true that Westerns succeeded in contaminating Arab-African relations to extent of hostility. The can be attributed to the cooperation between Arabs and Africans is completely controlled by the political moods rather than on true mutual interest.
This fluctuating mood has led to the absence of common vision to face challenges.
Therefore the necessity demands taking practical action not merely wishes and words to create a new regional cooperation for the human good. This cooperation should result in developing bordering cities economically, culturally, and at humanitarian level. There is also a need to boost up financial aids to be as or exceed
the western financial aids, which make people less dependent on Western and rebuild historical relations and revive ties of kinship between regional countries.
All this in the context of a humanitarian status-strong neighbor and good neighborliness. ...
The last few decades have witnessed a substantial development in the study of
International Relations. Many new theories and approaches have become part of the
current debate within international relations. One of these new approaches is
Construct
ivism which many scholars believe constitutes a bridge between the
positivist theories and the post-positivist theories. This study seeks to examine the
basic assumptions of Constructivism and its contribution to the study of
international relations
The events, the developments and the international changes are based on the tracks that always deviate as the result of wills struggle between the forces and states. In the sense that the political crises that countries face means a set of interactio
ns among the forces that have conflict which may reach to a confrontation. So we must be aware of the political and economic changes, according to the scientific methods to understand what threatens the interests of the states. Many of the sequential crises throughout history are resulted from the use of the power which is based on the object of the available resources. Therefore, the power is the practical exercise and the political investment abroad and that happens through diplomacy or war so that the state can determine its objectives, and decide what to choose among those of power tools.
The forces and the states have seek to own the overall power in order to be the motivator of the political units within the framework of the international community. There are countries which benefit from the wars set in their agendas in advance to achieve the aims of their policy. War is still an essential tool for states, governments and groups to achieve their interests through direct conflict, or through the threat of sanctions, or through aids, including the so-called soft power, and sometimes through the form of international legitimacy, including the emergence of the term "fighting terrorism" and what accompanied it of global changes led to politically, militarily, economically and technologically submission to the powerful nations.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
