Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userConstructivism in International Relations
النظرية البنائية في العلاقات الدولية
6841
6 291
0
(
0
)
Authors
خالد المصري( باحث )
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
شهدت العقود الأخيرة تطوراً كبيراً في مجال دراسة العلاقات الدولية إذ برزت مجموعة من المداخل و النظريات الجديدة أخذت تنافس النظريات التقليدية كالواقعية و الليبرالية التي اعتمدت الفلسفة الوضعية كأساس لفرضياتها الابستمولوجية و المنهجية. و قد تعددت الاتجاهات الجديدة و أخذت دورها في ماسمي بالجدل الراهن في العلاقات الدولية. و من بين النظريات الجديدة النظرية البنائية التي يقدمها أتباعها على أنَّها جسر يصل النظريات الوضعية بالنظريات النقدية الجديدة أو ما بعد الوضعية.. دخلت البنائية العلاقات الدولية مع أواخر الثمانينيات من القرن العشرين، و لكن سرعان ما تطورت و أصبحت ركناً أساسياً من أدبيات علم العلاقات الدولية. و قد جاء هذا البحث لدراسة الافتراضات الأساسية للنظرية البنائية و تقييم إسهامها في الجدل الراهن كجسر بين طرفي الجدل.
The last few decades have witnessed a substantial development in the study of International Relations. Many new theories and approaches have become part of the current debate within international relations. One of these new approaches is Constructivism which many scholars believe constitutes a bridge between the positivist theories and the post-positivist theories. This study seeks to examine the basic assumptions of Constructivism and its contribution to the study of international relations
References used
Alexander Wendt, "Anarchy What States Make of it", International Organizations, Vol. 46 No. 2 P391-425
Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999
Andrew Linklater and others, International Relations Theory, Palgrave, London, 2007
rate research
Read More
The events, the developments and the international changes are based on the tracks that always deviate as the result of wills struggle between the forces and states. In the sense that the political crises that countries face means a set of interactio
ns among the forces that have conflict which may reach to a confrontation. So we must be aware of the political and economic changes, according to the scientific methods to understand what threatens the interests of the states. Many of the sequential crises throughout history are resulted from the use of the power which is based on the object of the available resources. Therefore, the power is the practical exercise and the political investment abroad and that happens through diplomacy or war so that the state can determine its objectives, and decide what to choose among those of power tools.
The forces and the states have seek to own the overall power in order to be the motivator of the political units within the framework of the international community. There are countries which benefit from the wars set in their agendas in advance to achieve the aims of their policy. War is still an essential tool for states, governments and groups to achieve their interests through direct conflict, or through the threat of sanctions, or through aids, including the so-called soft power, and sometimes through the form of international legitimacy, including the emergence of the term "fighting terrorism" and what accompanied it of global changes led to politically, militarily, economically and technologically submission to the powerful nations.
The last few decades witnessed the rise of new approaches or frameworks in the
study of International relations. These new approaches are called post positivism.
Most of these approaches share a common view regarding the positivist theories
which
dominated international relations and political science for more than sixty
years. The new directions criticize the methodology and the epistemological and
ontological assumptions of positivism. In this paper we try to evaluate the
contribution of the positivist theories in international relations and the arguments of
the new approaches, mainly Critical theory, post-modernism and social
constructivism.
The existence of the Arabs in Africa extends deeply in history. In fact, there are many theorems to trace when Arabs arrived at Africa. These theorems vary depending on the way we want to define who Arabs are. In addition, the humanitarians' dimensio
ns in international relations are in themselves rather vague because such interpretation is not agreed upon in both western and international law especially in relation to Arab and African situations.
There is no doubt that international relations, especially neighbourhood relations, are not as they are supposed to be. In fact, these relations are completely oriented by
maintaining interest, ignoring morals, which results in replacing intimacy with resentment.
It is true that Westerns succeeded in contaminating Arab-African relations to extent of hostility. The can be attributed to the cooperation between Arabs and Africans is completely controlled by the political moods rather than on true mutual interest.
This fluctuating mood has led to the absence of common vision to face challenges.
Therefore the necessity demands taking practical action not merely wishes and words to create a new regional cooperation for the human good. This cooperation should result in developing bordering cities economically, culturally, and at humanitarian level. There is also a need to boost up financial aids to be as or exceed
the western financial aids, which make people less dependent on Western and rebuild historical relations and revive ties of kinship between regional countries.
All this in the context of a humanitarian status-strong neighbor and good neighborliness. ...
This research paper offers an analysis of the Syrian Crisis in light of
the Realist Theory of International Relations. It argues that Realism
can provide a better explanation for the conduct of regional and
international powers that intervene in t
he Syrian Crisis. As a
preliminary, the paper will provide a historical overview of partition
of Greater Syria since the beginning of the twentieth century to the
establishment of the present-day Syrian state. This places the Syrian
crisis within a historical context that the researcher believes is
important for a deeper understanding of regional and international
policies towards the Syrian Crisis.
International relations have witnessed great changes after the
collapse of the Soviet Union, and the emergence of the United
States pole sole controlled the fate of international relations, and
the impact of these changes significant to the Russia
n Federation
and the heir of the Soviet Union, as experienced international
pressure continuing to encircle and isolate and control their own
destiny, but it did not stand idle in front of this pressures, and was
able, thanks to a set of political and economic variables and
procedures for the Advancement again and restore its role as her
weight in the world.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
