Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Penal procedural protection for the media in the primary stage of the investigation -A comparative study-

الحماية الجزائية الإجرائية للإعلامي في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي - دراسة مقارنة -

1153   0   11   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2016
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

For as long as the media is a free call and women reflect the free expression of opinion and freedom of the media has always been a manifestation of freedom of expression and reflect the reality of the communities and cultures of peoples which requires with the maintenance and protection of this freedom and guarantee not threatened or compromised spontaneously, this protection guarantee of media freedom and freedom of expression on the other , However even transcend media freedom must be commensurate with its limitations which requires him to establish a standard precise and fair balance between two first right of individuals to express their views and ideas within the limits of the law, is a constitutional right, The second interest is the State's right to hold both hurts or harms the interests protected by law and reflected when opinions and ideas highlighted by the media through the media are those that would undermine rights and interests protected by law and devote her legal protection, and search the criminal procedural protection of information would not only maintain media freedom of wasted and reduce their value but would maintain rights and interests protected by law of the media abuse.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
تتناول هذه الدراسة الحماية الجزائية الإجرائية للإعلامي في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي، مع التركيز على المقارنة بين التشريعين السوري والفرنسي. تبرز الدراسة أهمية حرية الإعلام كجزء من حرية التعبير عن الرأي، وتؤكد على ضرورة حماية هذه الحرية لضمان عدم المساس بها. تتناول الدراسة مفهوم الإعلامي والجريمة الإعلامية، وتوضح الإجراءات الخاصة بالتحقيق الابتدائي في الجرائم الإعلامية، مثل التفتيش، وضبط الأشياء، والشهادة، والاستجواب، والقبض والتوقيف. تخلص الدراسة إلى أن التشريع السوري لم يوفر ضمانات كافية للإعلامي مقارنة بالتشريع الفرنسي، وتقدم توصيات لتحسين هذه الضمانات، مثل وضع تعريف جامع للإعلامي، والمساواة بين مسكن الإعلامي ومكتبه، وحماية سرية مصادر المعلومات.
Critical review
تُعَدُّ هذه الدراسة خطوة هامة في تسليط الضوء على الحماية الجزائية للإعلاميين في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي. ومع ذلك، يمكن القول أن الدراسة قد أغفلت بعض الجوانب الهامة التي كان من الممكن أن تُثري البحث. على سبيل المثال، لم تتناول الدراسة بشكل كافٍ تأثير التغيرات التكنولوجية الحديثة على حرية الإعلام والإجراءات الجزائية المتعلقة بها. كما أن المقارنة بين التشريعين السوري والفرنسي كانت تحتاج إلى تعمق أكبر في بعض النقاط، مثل تأثير السياق الثقافي والسياسي على تطبيق هذه التشريعات. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، كان من الممكن أن تُقدِّم الدراسة أمثلة عملية أو حالات دراسية لتوضيح النقاط النظرية بشكل أفضل.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو الهدف الرئيسي من هذه الدراسة؟

    الهدف الرئيسي من الدراسة هو تسليط الضوء على الحماية الجزائية الإجرائية للإعلامي في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي، ومقارنة التشريعات السورية والفرنسية في هذا السياق.

  2. ما هي الجريمة الإعلامية وفقاً للدراسة؟

    تعرف الجريمة الإعلامية بأنها نشر لأفكار مختلفة بكافة وسائل الإعلام والنشر، تتضمن سلوكيات محظورة إيجابية أو سلبية، وصادرة عن إرادة جزائية، يحددها القانون، ويرد عليها بعقوبة جزائية أو تدبير.

  3. ما هي التوصيات التي قدمتها الدراسة لتحسين الحماية الجزائية للإعلامي في سوريا؟

    قدمت الدراسة عدة توصيات، منها وضع تعريف جامع للإعلامي، المساواة بين مسكن الإعلامي ومكتبه، حماية سرية مصادر المعلومات، وعدم استخدام الوثائق المضبوطة كدليل إدانة في جرائم أخرى.

  4. كيف تختلف إجراءات التحقيق الابتدائي في الجرائم الإعلامية بين التشريعين السوري والفرنسي؟

    التشريع السوري يفتقر إلى ضمانات كافية للإعلامي مقارنة بالتشريع الفرنسي، حيث يوفر الأخير ضمانات أكثر تفصيلاً مثل عدم المساس بحرية ممارسة الإعلامي لمهنته أثناء التفتيش، وحماية سرية مصادر المعلومات بشكل أفضل.


References used
د. السراج , عبود , 2007 , شرح قانون العقوبات , القسم العام, منشورات جامعة دمشق, , بدون رقم طبعة .
د. حسن بكار , حاتم , 2007 أصول الإجراءات الجنائية , منشأة المعارف , الاسكندرية
د. حومد ,عبد الوهاب , 1987 أصول المحاكمات الجزائية, المطبعة الجديدة , دمشق, ط 4
rate research

Read More

The right of defense can be considered as natural rights, and the most important fair trial guarantees. It is also an inherent right at the center of public individual rights. It has not only created in favor of the individual but also for the bene fit of society as a whole. There is no justice when accused people do not have a full right of defense and where not possible to verify the truth. This means that enabling the accused to defend himself does not mean that the punishment is over, but means to emphasize the fundamental pillar of justice that will reassure the individuals to the proper functioning of mechanisms in carrying out its mission, and this would remove any doubts about injustice suspicion when Jurisdiction will announce the accused conviction, also removing the suspicion of complacency while deciding his innocence. Therefore, search in protecting the right of the accused to defend himself is not intellectually luxury, but generally speaking, it is searching in more accurate and the most complex legal issues, it is a dive in the depths, to stick to legitimacy in a centre of obstacles is not easy to overcome. Building on the above, we can say that the accused practice of his right to defend himself, remains inadequate to achieve the purpose if it is not criminally reinforced. And to enable the exercise of the right of accused to defend himself, the penal legislator decided to develop a set of substantive rules incriminating and justified, meaning the dedication of this right to proceed without fear or shame. The accused is in great need to exercise his right of defense under the umbrella of the criminal protection, and this will protect him of the treachery of his defense and ensures that his rights will not be exploited because of the weakness of his position, and the lack of his experience, and the conflict hostile facing him. To find out the aspects of this protection two sections have been developed in this research: the first section devoted to the study of the criminal substantive rules, while the second was created to the study of the justified substantive rules. The aim of this is to show the criminal aspects of protection of the right of the accused to defend in court.
To ensure the neutrality and impartiality of the judiciary depends not only on the commitment of carers by the principles of law and the good-aligned and without another party, but that the proper application of legal justice is sometimes subject to lack immune would influence them so that power is exercised its functions without any interference or influence by others, especially the media, since the latter exercises its functions on the basis of their right to freedom of information guaranteed by the Syrian Constitution promulgated by legislative decree/94/28/2/2012 article 42 thereof, , Posted what it considers constitutional exercise while the exercise of this right to influence judicial justice, and hence had to be legitimate lines of media freedom and lack of arbitrariness in the exercise of their right to through its impact on the smooth functioning of Justice. so learn whether the Syrian legislature has taken to achieve effective penal protection of information deployment impact litigation.
Intellectual property laws regulate and protect the rights arising from the design of computer programs and its production along with its special legislation. Thus, the attack on these programs pose a threat to those rights, which its owners did t heir best to produce and benefit their communities. The crime of damaging programs and information is an IT crime considered as a serious attacks mainly on information property. However it's different in the case of damaging crime, as it is not aimed at the enrichment at the expense of others, nor get the programs of others illegally, but targets only damage, destruction and vandalism to others property information without any enrichment.
in our research we came to the conclusion that the targeted protection of criminal possession is actual possession and possession of the intended protection criminal either by the prosecuting magistrate or the criminal judiciary is not the posses sion concept in the law civil and protected by three claims of possession, and that the prosecuting magistrate's position is to follow-up.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا