This study aims through dealing with Al- Jahez's rhetorical style, to assure the
originality of many principals of the style science in our rhetorical and critical heritage, so
this research starts the study from a hypothesis that is the style is c
onsidered equal and not
a substitute or an inheritor of the ancient Arab rhetorical.
It was necessary for the sake of the research to divide the study into two sections: the
first one discuss the bases which must be offered in the literary styles to reach the rhetoric
feature, and these bases are: The rightness grammatical, the commitment of the aesthetic
criterions which are customary for the Arabs. the second section is represented by studying
the ways which through them there is a presentation of the meanings in a rhetorical styles.
The research ends to that the artistic picture with all its different arts is considered
the best way to present the literary styles, because it marks the text by the artistic beauty
which affects the audience sense and their aesthetic faculties, and that is what leads to
succeed the aimed linguistic communication.
This research tries to address the problem of Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb Types of Rhetorics
according to Al-Jahiz and Ibn Wahab Al-Kateb
accusing Abi Othman Al-Jahiz of not giving rhetorics what it is worth, and of not
studying it thoroughfully. Ibn Wahab
claimed completing what is missed through his
detailed study of the types of rhetorics, which are, to a large extent, similar to the types of
rhetorics according to Abi Othman.The later referred to the importance of the relation
between pronunciation, meaning and the necessity of the accordance between the two. In
addition, meaning is prior to pronunciation because it depends upon thought and
contemplation. He describes the types of rhetorics in a pyramidal sequential through levels
that stem-- and result-- from each other.
Similarly, Ibn wahab considers that the types of rhetorics result from each other.
These types, according to critics, are a process of a birth of these forms.
Despite the big similarity of the types of rhetorics according to both Ibn Wahab Al-
Kateb and Abi Othman Al-Jahiz, the first was not only a transcriber, but also he added and
clarified in certain areas. He exclusively talked about writers and classified them in one of
five: transcript writer, pronunciation writer, contract writer, judgment writer and
management writer. He also mentioned the most important features that a transcript writer
must have and divided writers into three levels. He extended in talking about the types of
handwriting and the forms of pens. These issues were dropped by Al-Jahiz when talking
about the types of rhetorics.
This research is making a simple effort only in order to be added
to a set of previous efforts and it may come after it attempting to
gather to make an approach between these studies through the
use and the help of linguistic scholar of early Arab.
Scholars and scientists namely (Aljahes) T. (255 AH), and a
linguistic theory which the talk about it has grown a lot since the
beginning the century twenty namely the theory of context.
This research tackles important humanitarian issues, both old and new, dealt with by Al-Jahiz in his books and letters. The most important of which is the issue of intellectual freedom, mildness, and moderation. In the process of dealing with these m
atters, it became quite clear how Al- Jahiz was a humanitarian who persistently tried to find common ground and harmony between people as well as his continuous call not to turn variety and difference into conflict.
And so, Al-Jahiz became quite the advocate of intellectual freedom of his time, dismissing all that restrains him, in different venues of life, and believing in the importance of different opinions. Consequently, he established a culture on civilized conversation and rejected all kinds of fanaticism, extremism, sternness, and accusations of infidelity.
The research also attempts to delve deep down into Al-Jahiz’s intellect in the issues he tackled. It also tries to arrive at a reading of these issues in his texts. However, the research does not link Al-Jahiz’s intellect with the historical background or with the Mu’tazilah creed that made him glorify the mind making it his authority in every matter.
Finally, the research attributes Al-Jahiz’s intellect to his rare literary
genius that made him capable of approximating every creed to different kinds of minds.
This research studies the affected bigeye in his book "Animal tales
of Kalela and Demna to Ibn almkafaa, and includes a basic idea
represented in the evolution of shear on the tongues of animals that
were started Ibn al, Vagaah superstitious that
carry meaningful
socially or morally, educationally, evolved when bigeye to establish
a pattern of thinking about the legendary manifested in the book
animal, stood on his hand a new phase of coding, as it tried to
bigeye establishment thought mythical, lies the importance of the
subject in the study, an important aspect in fiction Kharafi founded
by Ibn al, and employed the techniques of narrative several, realized
the value of Fozvha in new formats and templates art serves its
goals and purposes, and the book is Kalela and Demna of the most
important heritage books, lies its value in being a book literary
education, he meets the art of politics and power, literature, social
education, and carries significant moral and socially, and sermons
and sentenced humanitarian suitable for every time and place, and
has had a significant impact on the Arabic literature narrative that
came after him, and every point in time was to take the form of
vulnerability to the book, either tradition and simulation and either
systems and synthesizes, or Building for new patterns are used
mostly technical framework used by Ibn al in anecdotes, and
employs techniques book narrative which he was credited in
substantiated to be branded echo guided by who came after him.
