Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Another PASS: A Reproduction Study of the Human Evaluation of a Football Report Generation System

تمريرة أخرى: دراسة استنساخ للتقييم البشري لنظام توليد تقرير كرة القدم

311   0   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2021
and research's language is English
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

This paper reports results from a reproduction study in which we repeated the human evaluation of the PASS Dutch-language football report generation system (van der Lee et al., 2017). The work was carried out as part of the ReproGen Shared Task on Reproducibility of Human Evaluations in NLG, in Track A (Paper 1). We aimed to repeat the original study exactly, with the main difference that a different set of evaluators was used. We describe the study design, present the results from the original and the reproduction study, and then compare and analyse the differences between the two sets of results. For the two headline' results of average Fluency and Clarity, we find that in both studies, the system was rated more highly for Clarity than for Fluency, and Clarity had higher standard deviation. Clarity and Fluency ratings were higher, and their standard deviations lower, in the reproduction study than in the original study by substantial margins. Clarity had a higher degree of reproducibility than Fluency, as measured by the coefficient of variation. Data and code are publicly available.



References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research

Read More

Abstract Human evaluation of modern high-quality machine translation systems is a difficult problem, and there is increasing evidence that inadequate evaluation procedures can lead to erroneous conclusions. While there has been considerable research on human evaluation, the field still lacks a commonly accepted standard procedure. As a step toward this goal, we propose an evaluation methodology grounded in explicit error analysis, based on the Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) framework. We carry out the largest MQM research study to date, scoring the outputs of top systems from the WMT 2020 shared task in two language pairs using annotations provided by professional translators with access to full document context. We analyze the resulting data extensively, finding among other results a substantially different ranking of evaluated systems from the one established by the WMT crowd workers, exhibiting a clear preference for human over machine output. Surprisingly, we also find that automatic metrics based on pre-trained embeddings can outperform human crowd workers. We make our corpus publicly available for further research.
Solar and wind energy is considered as one of the best renewable energy resources because it Available and economical . We can take advantage of these two resources of renewable energy in Katina area in Homs for designing and building a bilateral r esources (solar-wind) electric power system, depending on the daily bending of the wind speed and the solar radiation intensity in the studied area. This research studies the design of a hybrid wind and solar system by selecting its components that available in the local market in terms of their nominal, technical specifications, based on the technical and economic studies and the corresponding international standards. The obtained results showed that we have approximately (1246.7 Kw/Year) surplus during the year for the benefit of consumers, which makes the system economically feasible for investment, as explained in research needs an additional resource to feed the load and charge the energy-savings with (3360.2 w/day) that constituting (50.4 %) of the volume of the load in addition to the practical results provides a theoretical database, whether for the researcher or the investor in the field of renewable energies, particularly in terms of the efficiency of selecting the system’s components.
We ask subjects whether they perceive as human-produced a bunch of texts, some of which are actually human-written, while others are automatically generated. We use this data to fine-tune a GPT-2 model to push it to generate more human-like texts, an d observe that this fine-tuned model produces texts that are indeed perceived more human-like than the original model. Contextually, we show that our automatic evaluation strategy well correlates with human judgements. We also run a linguistic analysis to unveil the characteristics of human- vs machine-perceived language.
Professional sport occupied a prominent place in public life in the last century, especially football, which has become the most popular sport in the whole world, for this purpose sports venues (stadiums) has been to build and develop to be a cent er held the sporting events and accommodate the largest number of audience who follow it, and to meet the needs of this growing audience and its requirements (comfort, easy access, protection ......). which form a challenge for designers and structural engineers to design a stadium that meets these requirements constitutes urban monument of aesthetic and constructional and technical. This research deals with football stadiums and its development through history, the basics of its design (the basic principles in the design-the speed of unloading terraced-external factors affecting), the recommendations of FIFA in the field of design and construction of sports stadiums (matters to be considered during the design process-location of the stadium) , the most important methods of construction used in covering sports stadiums (Post and beam-goal post structure-cantilever structure - shellfish concrete- compression/tension ring - tension structures - air-supported roofs - space frames –retractable roofs) and the materials used in the coverage, so that it is a simplified manual covers all aspects of design and construction.
This paper reviews and summarizes human evaluation practices described in 97 style transfer papers with respect to three main evaluation aspects: style transfer, meaning preservation, and fluency. In principle, evaluations by human raters should be t he most reliable. However, in style transfer papers, we find that protocols for human evaluations are often underspecified and not standardized, which hampers the reproducibility of research in this field and progress toward better human and automatic evaluation methods.

suggested questions

comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا