Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEvidence Rules In Disputes Related To The Nationality Law
قواعد الإثبات في المنازعات المرتبطة بقانون الجنسية
878
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Tishreen University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2021
fields
Low Sciences
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
إن أهمية إثبات الجنسية تستمد من أهمية الجنسية ذاتها ومن حيث كونها تكيف حياة الفرد في الدولة وفي المجتمع الدولي. و حاجة الفرد إلى إثبات جنسيته تتصل بحياته اليومية حيث يتوقف عليها الكثير من حقوقه والتزاماته وتصرفاته التي يباشرها وعلاقاته بالآخرين . فأهمية إثبات الجنسية لا تبدو ضرورتها فقط عند قيام نزاع قضائي حول جنسية الشخص, بل إنها تقوم أيضا خارج إطار النزاع القضائي وفي كل حالة يستلزم فيها الأمر اثبات وضع الشخص من حيث الجنسية سواء للدفاع عن مصالحه أم في مواجهة الغير, أم لتحديد معاملته من حيث الحقوق والالتزامات إزاء الجهات والسلطات المختلفة في الدول المعنية أو قبل الدول الأخرى .
The importance of proof of nationality derives from the importance of nationality itself and in terms of it being the adaptation of the individual’s life in the state and in the international community. The individual’s need to prove his nationality is related to his daily life as much of his rights, obligations, actions, and relations with others depend on it. The importance of proving nationality does not seem necessary only when a judicial dispute over a person’s nationality arises, but it also takes place outside the framework of the judicial dispute and in every case in which it is necessary to prove the person’s nationality status, whether to defend his interests or confront others or to determine his treatment in terms of rights and obligations With regard to the various authorities and authorities in the concerned countries or before other countries.
References used
uad dib, le droit international privé 1, université de damas, 2019
rate research
Read More
This paper seeks to compare how the administrative disputes are seen before the
Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or
regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Cour
t or the
Supreme Administrative Court in Jordan and Egypt.
Therefore, this study aims to highlight how the administrative disputes are seen
before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional
law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or
the Supreme Administrative Court.
It is true that prior to the enacting of the Administrative Justice Act No. 27 of 2014 ,
the Jordanian legislator used to deal with the High Court of Justice as one of the special
judicial authorities, which may raise the case of allegation of unconstitutionality directly,
similar to the Court of Cassation.
Unlike the substantive Court which sees the case, the Jordan legislator obliged it to
raise the allegation of unconstitutionality to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation
will decide whether to raise the appeal of unconstitutionality or not.
As for the Egyptian context, Egypt depends on the law of the State Council No. 48 of
1979. This law 1979 entrusted to Court of Administrative Justice Administrative Court and
the Supreme Administrative Court to raise alleged unconstitutionality law directly to the
Supreme Constitutional Court.
The present research addresses one of the new and important financial and taxation
issues, namely: the resolution of tax disputes via administrative means. It seeks out to find
resolutions for tax disputes that arise between the taxpayer and the ta
x administration when
applying the revenue law where administrative committees formed for that purpose would
undertake resolving these disputes before being referred to the judicial stage in order to
lessen the burden laid upon the judicial stage. This research discusses the importance of
identifying the nature of tax disputes, concept, characteristics, and the reasons that lead to
tax disputes between taxpayers and tax administration.
The study attempts to explain the concept of objection, its conditions and effects. The
research also addresses the administrative committees specialized in resolving tax disputes
in the administrative stage shedding the light on their formation, mechanism of work,
decisions, best formulas of taxpayer-tax administration resolutions for tax disputes, and
best solutions for the problems facing both the taxpayer and the tax administration in
resolving tax disputes arising between them via administrative means.
Computer crimes are Intelligent crimes committed in secret.
The offender has a high level of technical expertise, and the main
objective is to undermine the owners of the programs and
information and their rights, whether natural or legal persons,
and
may extend to include the state and its secrets.
The multiplicity of these crimes makes it difficult to detect,
and pursue the offender, because they do not leave any trace behind.
This makes it more difficult to prove and investigate.
The role of the UN Security Council in the implementation of the
rules of international humanitarian law through the authority
granted to him under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United
Nations if it is exposed these rules are violated, especia
lly when
committing war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide,
which is a threat to international peace and security.
Under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations Security
Council to resort to measures stipulated by articles 41 and 42 of the
Charter, including economic sanctions and responded to in Article
41, for example, but not limited to, the use of armed force contained
in Article 42, in order to ensure respect for the rules of law IHL and
thus keeping international peace and security, but that practice has
proved the failure of the Security Council this task in many areas of
the world, but on the contrary, the international forces operating in
order to maintain international peace and security committed crimes
in violation of international humanitarian law and targeted many
civilians.
And reflected the role of the Security Council is also in the
implementation of the rules of international humanitarian law
through the establishment of criminal tribunals temporary, such as
those established in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and its
relationship with the International Criminal Court after the Rome
Statute in 1998, and the evaluation of this power and the
relationship to refer the crimes without the other, which contributed
to the realization of the principle of duplication and giving priority
to political considerations at the expense of international justice that
the world today desperately need it.
The volume of data being generated nowadays is increasing at
phenomenal rate. Extracting useful knowledge from such data
collections is an important and challenging issue. A promising
technique is the rough set approach, a new mathematical method
to data analysis based on classification of objects into similarity
classes, which are indiscernible with respect to some features. This
paper focuses on discovering maximal generalized decision rules
in databases based on a simple or multiple regression, generalized
theory, and decision matrix.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
