The purpose of this study was to examine the organizational justice
of the Academic Chairpersons at the Jordanian Public Universities and its
relationship to organizational loyalty of the faculty members.
The population of the study consisted of a
ll 2905 Jordanian teaching
faculty members, appointed on full-time basis at the Jordanian public
universities, whereas the sample of the study consisted of 450 members
selected by using the stratified random technique
تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى دراسة العوامل المحددة لسلوك المواطنة التنظيمية لدى العاملين في منظمة الهلال الأحمر العربي السوري- فرع ريف دمشق, كما تهدف إلى التعرف على سلوك المواطنة التنظيمية بشكل عام بالإضافة إلى تعزيز سلوك المواطنة التنظيمية من خلال الوقوف عند أهم العوامل المحددة.
The research aims to identify the impact of the absence of organizational justice
dimensions: distributive justice, Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, the spread of the
phenomenon of corruption among the workers in the city of Latakia Counc
il. Adopted Find
descriptive approach and included the research community all employees in Lattakia City
Council, the research sample are soft sample of employees amounted to (175) factor has
been the questionnaires they distributed and returned them (161) to identify and complete
for statistical analysis and response rate (92%). And the adoption of appropriate statistical
methods was the most important results that have been reached:
*The sense of workers fairly transactions was the highest relative importance
(64.26%), followed by a sense of fairness of procedures relative importance (56.68%),
followed by a sense of justice of the distribution relative importance (53.89%).
*The absence of organizational justice has an impact on the behavior of the spread of
corruption among employees in Lattakia City Council, where (60.9%) of the developments
in the spread of behaviors administrative corruption among employees is explained by the
absence of organizational justice in general changes. For each dimension of organizational
justice dimensions; the absence of distributive justice explains (54%), and the absence of
procedural Justice explains (55.5%), and the absence of Interactional Justice explains
(57.8%).