Do you want to publish a course? Click here

An Evaluation of The Edema Resulted by The Surgical Extraction of Impacted The Lower Third Molar Use of Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) versus Normal Saline as Irrigating Solution During Bone Removal

تقييم الوذمة الناتجة عن القلع الجراحي للرحى الثالثة السفلية المنطمرة لاستخدام البوفيدون اليودي PVP-I مقابل السيروم الملحي كسائل إرواء أثناء التفريغ العظمي

1257   0   15   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2015
  fields Dentistry
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The aim of this clinical study compared the use of normal saline versus (PVP-I) as Irrigating solution during bone removal on the following edema of The surgical extraction of the lower third molar impacted.

References used
ZAMORA,J 1996 Chemical and microbiologic characteristics and toxicity of povidone iodine solutions Am J Surg, vol.151:401–406
GREENSTEIN,G 1999 Povidone–iodine’s effects and role in the management of periodontal diseases a review J Periodontol, vol.70:1397–1405
CHUNDAMALA,J WRIGHT,J 2007 The efficacy and risks of using povidoneiodin irrigation to prevent surgical site infection an evidence-based review Can J Surg, vol 50(6):473– 4813
rate research

Read More

The aim of this study was to compare the pain and the time consumed during surgical extraction of the impacted lower third molars using Er:YAG laser and surgical burs. The study included 40 impacted molar existed in 20 patients (11male + 9 female ) who had two symmetric impacted lower molars. The time consumed during the extraction was measured and the pain was observed during one, three and seven days after the surgical operation. After that the data were statistically studied. As a result of this study, the mean of the time consumed in bone removal was (9.5) minutes using surgical burs and (15.7) minutes using Er:YAG laser. So there was significant difference between the two methods. There was no significant difference in pain between the two methods during the three observation periods. Based on the results of this study, the use of Er:YAG laser as an alternative method to the surgical burs is possible but it consumes a lot of time during bone removal.
The objective of this study was to Compare between The Effect Of secondary closure and Rubber Drain post surgical Extraction to Impacted Lower Third Molars On edema, pain, and trismus level. Clinical trial included symmetric bilateral 40 lower thi rd molar in 20 patients whose ages between18-45 years. The sample was randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: included 20 molars ,a 4–5 mm wedge of mucosa adjacent to the second molar was removed to obtain secondary healing. Group 2: included 20 molars ,a rubber drain was inserted into the extraction socket near the buccal fold after surgery and left for 72h. Edema, pain and trismus were measured On first , third and seventh day following surgery. The findings showed a significant difference between the effect of secondary closure and rubber drain on the Edema, pain and trismus after surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molars. The Edema, pain and trismus were less in secondary closure group.
This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of the use of Platelet- Rich Fibrin on immediat complication following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. forty extractions of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars were performed in 20 volunt eers (18 to 25 years old). After extraction of right and left mandibular third molars, the socket at 1 side received the autologous PRF (test group) and the other was filled with blood clot (control group) .
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone, as a single 4-mg dose, which was injected into the masseter muscle upon completion of extraction of impacted lower third molars . this study is A prospective, randomized controll ed study . This study involves 40 healthy patients of both sexes with impacted mandibular third molars in this study . The difficulty of extraction was similar in all cases. The test side received 4 mg of dexamethasone This dose was injected into the masseter muscle via the intrabuccal approach, immediately after suturing of the surgical wound. The control side received 4 mg of dexamethasone injected into the gluteal area.

suggested questions

comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا