Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The Efficacy of 4% Articaine HCL in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block During Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molar

فاعلية Articaine HCL4% في القلع الجراحي للأرحاء الثالثة السفلية المنطمرة

1118   0   96   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2016
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine HCL with 2% Lidocaine HCL, both with epinephrine 1:100,000, in truncal block of the inferior alveolar nerve during the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.

References used
Meier ,ML Widmayer, S Abazi, J Brugger, M Lukic, N Luchinger ,R Ettlin ,DA 2015The human brain response to dental pain relief, Journal of Dental Research, vol94,690-696
YAGIELA, J.A 2004 Local Anesthetics . In: YAGIELA, J.A; DOWD, F.J; NEIDLE, E.A; eds Pharmacology and Therapeutics for Dentistry, 5th ed. 251-270
SNOECK, M 2012 Articaine HCL : a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia.Dove press Journal: local and regional anesthesia,vol. 5.23-33
rate research

Read More

The aim of this study was to compare the pain and the time consumed during surgical extraction of the impacted lower third molars using Er:YAG laser and surgical burs. The study included 40 impacted molar existed in 20 patients (11male + 9 female ) who had two symmetric impacted lower molars. The time consumed during the extraction was measured and the pain was observed during one, three and seven days after the surgical operation. After that the data were statistically studied. As a result of this study, the mean of the time consumed in bone removal was (9.5) minutes using surgical burs and (15.7) minutes using Er:YAG laser. So there was significant difference between the two methods. There was no significant difference in pain between the two methods during the three observation periods. Based on the results of this study, the use of Er:YAG laser as an alternative method to the surgical burs is possible but it consumes a lot of time during bone removal.
This clinical study included 30 cases of impacted lower third molars, which were surgically extracted at the oral surgery department at Tishreen University in Lattakia. The ages of patients were between 20 - 30 years. The aim of this study was to e valuate the effect of alveolar rinse with Tetracycline and Articaine mixture on pain, edema, and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. The sample was divided into two groups: - First Group (Study Group): /16/ impacted lower third molars were surgically extracted. The alveolar socket was rinsed with Tetracycline and Articaine mixture immediately after removal of the impacted molar. - Second Group (Control Group): /14/ impacted lower third molars were surgically extracted. The alveolar socket was rinsed with Saline immediately after removal of the impacted molar. The study showed that alveolar rinse with Tetracycline and Articaine mixture had a significant effect on pain, edema, and trismus after surgical extraction of lower third molars in comparison with Saline alveolar rinse (P<0.05).
This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of the use of Platelet- Rich Fibrin on immediat complication following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. forty extractions of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars were performed in 20 volunt eers (18 to 25 years old). After extraction of right and left mandibular third molars, the socket at 1 side received the autologous PRF (test group) and the other was filled with blood clot (control group) .
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا