Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userRussian Foreign Policy in the Middle East after the Cold War
السياسة الخارجية الرّوسية في الشرق الأوسط بعد الحرب الباردة
1542
3 68
0
(
0
)
Added by
Tishreen University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2015
fields
political science
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
أصبحت روسيا بعد انهيار الاتحاد السوفييتي و انتهاء الحرب الباردة، الوريث الشرعي و القانوني للاتحاد السوفييتي، و ورثت عنه المقعد الدائم في مجلس الأمن الدولي، و لتوافر مجموعة من عوامل القوة مثل المساحة الجغرافية و الإمكانات الاقتصادية و عدد السكان و القدرات العسكرية بما فيها الترسانة الكبيرة من السلاح النووي، جعلت من روسيا واحدة من القوى الفاعلة على المستوى الدولي، لذلك فهي تحاول اليوم أن يكون لها دورٌ مهمّ في منطقة الشرق الأوسط، و تطمح أن تكون منافساً للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية في المنطقة، و خلال فترة حكم بوتين تجسدت السياسة الخارجية الروسية في منطقة الشرق الأوسط بمواقف ازدادت قوة مع تصاعد الأزمات الإقليمية، و لاحظنا ذلك في الموقف الروسي من الاحتلال الأمريكي للعراق، و كذلك موقفها من أحداث مايسمى "بالربيع العربي"، و هذا ما جعل دور روسيا يزداد أهمية مع تحقيق الاستقرار في منطقة الشرق الأوسط.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war, Russia became the legitimate heir to the Soviet Union, and inherited his permanent seat in the UN Security Council, and the availability of a range of strengths such as geographicalarea and economic potential and population, and military capacity, including large nuclear arsenal, has made Russia one of the actors at the international level, so they are trying today to have an important role in the Middle East, and aspires to be a competitor for the United States in the region, during the reign of Putin'sreflected Russian foreign policy in the Middle East positions strengthened with regional crises, we noted that in the Russian stance of the US occupation of Iraq, as well as the position of the so-called "Arab spring", this has made the role of Russia is increasing the importance of achieving stability in the Middle East.
References used
Andrew C. Kuchins ؛ Igor A. Zevelev, Russian Foreign Policy: Continuity in Change. Center for Strategie and International Studies The Washington Quarterly, Vol.35, N°.1, Winter 2012
الأصفهاني، نبيه. السياسة الروسية في مرحلة تحول ديمقراطي، مجلة السياسة الدولية، مؤسسة الأهرام، . القاهرة، العدد 136 ،نيسان 1999
الشحف، فريد حاتم. العلاقات الروسية الإيرانية وأثرها على الخريطة الجيوسياسية في منطقة الخليج العربي، دار الطليعة، دمشق، الطبعة الأولى، 2005.
rate research
Read More
Russian-Iranian relations began crystallize and expand significantly after the
end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, but
these relations seemed cautious in the beginning, despite the existence of
common interests
between both countries represented to strengthen Iran's
military and economic capabilities, Russia considered as a supportive partner
in this field, in addition to nuclear cooperation where Russia was the only
country that has not been subject to pressure from the United States and
accepted the signing of the contract for the establishment of the Iranian
nuclear reactor, In contrast, Russia has considered these relationships an
opportunity to improve its economy, which suffered a strong tremor after the
disintegration of the Soviet Union.
The study addressed the Iranian – Turkish relations after the cold war and focused on
the most important interactions and trans formations takin, place between the two states in
light of the international, regional and internal developments.
The s
tudy also analyzed the dialectic cooperation-competition which takes control of
the track of Iranian-Turkish relationship since the end of the cold war as it identified the
cooperation and competition factors between the two states in the three environments
(internal, regional and international).
The study found that the Iranian – Turkish relations have directly been affected by
the end of the cold war when the collapse of the Soviet Union led to building up the
regional role and political influence of the two states in the Middle East and central Asia in
an effort to get the major regional power status in the regional system.
The study found that the Iranian – Turkish relations have directly been affected by
the end of the cold war when the collapse of the Soviet Union led to building up the
regional role and political influence of the two states in the Middle East and central Asia in
an effort to get the major regional power status in the regional system.
After the dismemberment of the “Arab Homeland” by “Sykes – Picot Agreement”
(1916), “Belford Declaration” (1917), the Independence of the “Orient States” (1946), and
the establishment of the so-called “State of Israel” (1948), the concern of the US
A was
concentrated on rallying the States of the Middle East in a “Defense Organization” to
resist the Arab National Orientation, and the „Communist Threats”, and to protect the
western investments, through indigenous military forces and local self-finance. The USA
and Western commitment towards this defense system is restricted to some military and
technical assistance and full control of the military, economic, political, social and cultural
activities in a way that
protects and guarantees the western interests, investments and plans.
The study addressed the most important phases of Turkish foreign policy since the
establishment of the modern Turkish republic in 1923. And the principles govering it. Then
it focused on the new trends of foreign policy after the Jastice and develo
pment Islamic
rooted party came to power in Turkey 2002. Especially the strategic depth, reset problems
or zero problems with neighbors and new ottomanism.
The study concluded that the basic tenets which guided turkey's foreign policy since
the founding of the republic included caution and pragmatism.
The discoveries of gas fields in the Eastern Mediterranean region led to many regional reactions; between those who welcomed it, and between expectations of the outbreak of conflicts over those fields and the overlapping of the influence of the major
countries in the region. In the forefront: Russia and the states The United States of America, the European Union, Syria, Turkey, Lebanon and Palestine. This research sheds light on the new gas discoveries in the Eastern Mediterranean countries and their economic and geopolitical impact on the relations of the major countries with the region. The study aimed to look at the reality of the energy war that the region is witnessing and its role in shaping future international policies and strategies. The study used the descriptive analytical approach to describing the true picture behind the strategies of the state's parties that were discussed, indicating the impact of invasive discoveries in drawing these strategies. The study concluded that the Middle East region embraces the most important wealth and the most intense battles. As none of the parties can work alone to end the conflict politically or militarily, but requires coordination on the level of international interests for each party, given that the region is only an arena that hosts a set of goals and interests the opposing major countries of the world.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
