Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIn-vitro Comparative Study To Assess The Shaping Ability of The Single File Technique in Preparation of The Root Canals
دراسة مخبرية مقارِنة لتقييم قدرة تقنية المبرد المفرد على تحضير الأقنية الجذرية
1013
0 53
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تألفت عينة الدراسة من 72 سنا مقلوعة منحنية الجذور, درجة انحنائها (15-35) درجة, نظفت و حفظت في الفورمالين مدة 48 ساعة. تم قياس درجة الانحناء لكل جذر في العينة باستخدام برنامج AutoCAD2010. تم فتح الحجرة اللبية لكل سن و قياس الطول العامل, صبت القوالب الإكريلية للأسنان و غرست ضمنها. تم ترقيم العينة و قسمت إلى ثلاث مجموعات بالتساوي. حضرت كل مجموعة (24 سن) بنظام من أنظمة الدراسة (WaveOne, Reciproc, OneShape).
The specimen consists of 72 extracted teeth with curved roots (15-35)degree . They were cleaned and preserved in formalin for 48 hours. Each tooth was mounted in a self curing acrylic block. The samples were divided into three groups. Each group (24 canals) was instrumented with one of the systems (WaveOne, Reciproc, OneShape).
References used
SCHILDER H 1974 Cleaning and shaping the root cana, Dent Clin North Am,18:269-296
COHEN S, 2002-Pathways of the pulp.Mosby, 8th ed. 231-292
WALIA H, Brantley W and Gerstein H 1988 An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files,Journal of endodontics, 14(7): p. 346-351
rate research
Read More
Aim: to compare the shaping ability of two rotary systems (Protaper Universal and
Protaper Next) and K-file hand instruments in curved root canals of extracted human
molars.
Materials and methods:Thirty extracted molars with curved canals were cho
sen. The
curvature of root canals was determined (15-40o) then the sample was randomly divided
into three groups: n1=n2=n3=10. Group(1): was prepared using K-file hand instruments
(Stand), group(2): prepared by Protaper Universal (PTU), whereas group3: prepared by
Protaper Next (PTN).The curvature after preparation and Time preparationwere evaluated.
Data were collected and statistical analysis was conducted.
Results: The three instrument systems (PTU, PTN, Stand) have caused significant
change in original canal curvature(P<0.05). On the other hand, there were no significant
differences between systemsin straightening of canal curvature (P>0.05). However, both
systems: PTN, Stand were significantly faster than PTU during preparation of curved
canals (P<0,001).Conclusion: under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded
thatall instruments caused changing in original canal curvature. However, the new
generation PTN was faster than old one PTU.
Aim: to compare the shaping ability of NiTi hand instruments with Stainless- steel instruments in preparation of curved root canal in extracted teeth.
Materials and Methods: a total of 24 of curved root canal were randomly divided into two groups. O
ne group was prepared using stainless steel instruments and the other prepared NiTi instruments. Curvatures pre-and post instrumentation were registered and compared. And straightening of the canals were determined by autocad analysis system.
Results: two systems were significantly changed the original canal curvature with no differences between both systems. However, the time required to finish preparation was significantly less with NiTi system.
Conclusion: under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that two hand instrumentation system changed the original canal curvature, but the time consuming to finish the preparation was less with NiTi hand system.
Ultrasonic Tips is considered one of the common tool used in the management of separated instruments in the root canal, . , this research aimed to evaluate the temperature rise of the outer surface of the root when using ultrasonic tips to remove separated instruments from mesiobuccal canal of the lower molars.
Aim of study: to compare the ability of four restorative materials (MTA - Composite
- Zinc Phosphate - Glass Ionomer Cement) in coronal sealing of the endodontically treated
root canal orifice in extracted teeth.
Materials and Methods: 60 extracte
d teeth with single canal were chosen. X-Ray
Images were taken, then their crowns were cut off by using diamond disc, then the canals
were classically prepared, after that, they were filled with Zinc Oxide Eugenol Cement and
the gutta-percha cones using Lateral Condensation technique. They were left for (24) hours
in order to ensure the quite hardening of the filling material. After that, the filling material
was removed vertically by using an eraser tool up to a depth of (2) mm inside the root
canal. Then, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups, each contained (15) teeth
(n1=n2=n3=n4=15). The entry orifices of all the teeth were filled with one of the
restorative materials. The teeth were coated with Varnish except for 1 mm around orifices,
After then, they were immersed in Methylene Blue Dye of 2 % for five minutes. After that,
the teeth were washed under a stream of plentiful water and left to dry. Longitudinal
sections were made in the buccal lingual direction. Then the sections were examined under
the optical magnifier to measure the liner dye leakage using a millimeter ruler designed by
“AutoCAD 2013” Program.
Aim: to compare the apical sealing ability of three root canal sealers in human
extracted teeth using dye penetration.
Materials and Methods: thirty extracted human maxillary teeth were instrumented
1mm short of the anatomical apex and randomly as
signed to three groups (n=10),
according to the root canal sealer used for obturation. The teeth were divided into three
experimental groups and obturated by cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and one of
the following sealers: group I, Zinc oxide and Eugenol sealer; group II, Adseal; group III,
Apexit plus.The teeth were covered with nail varnish to within 2-3mm of the apical
foramen and immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 hours.After this period, the teeth were
washed and cut longitudinally for apical leakage measurement inside the canal.
Results: Statistical evaluation of the results showed no significant difference in the
leakage between Adseal and Apexit plus (P =0.99). Leakage with ZOE was significantly
lesser than Adseal (P=0.004) andApexit Plus (P=0.003).
Conclusions:under the condition of this study, it can be concluded that ZOE presents
lower apical leakage than Adseal and Apexit plus, and there was no significant difference
in leakage between Adseal and Apexit plus.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
