Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The general rule of responsibility in modern legislation is that every fault causes harm to others, oblige the perpetrator to make reparation. But the absolute application of this rule will cause reluctance of the judge's decision dictated by his conscience and will lead to the judge's preoccupation with his main work, which is the separation of disputes, to defend himself in the cases that may be raised by the opponents. However, the litigants can not be held accountable for their impartiality and their proper application of the law. Therefore, the legislator has given the litigants the right to hold the judge accountable through a case of dissent.
the research aim to determine what is the electronic arbitration as a term and concept and then the understanding of substantive and procedural legal aspects, all this as the way to resolve electronic commerce disputes.
This paper seeks to compare how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Cour t or the Supreme Administrative Court in Jordan and Egypt. Therefore, this study aims to highlight how the administrative disputes are seen before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or the Supreme Administrative Court. It is true that prior to the enacting of the Administrative Justice Act No. 27 of 2014 , the Jordanian legislator used to deal with the High Court of Justice as one of the special judicial authorities, which may raise the case of allegation of unconstitutionality directly, similar to the Court of Cassation. Unlike the substantive Court which sees the case, the Jordan legislator obliged it to raise the allegation of unconstitutionality to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation will decide whether to raise the appeal of unconstitutionality or not. As for the Egyptian context, Egypt depends on the law of the State Council No. 48 of 1979. This law 1979 entrusted to Court of Administrative Justice Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to raise alleged unconstitutionality law directly to the Supreme Constitutional Court.
The present research addresses one of the new and important financial and taxation issues, namely: the resolution of tax disputes via administrative means. It seeks out to find resolutions for tax disputes that arise between the taxpayer and the ta x administration when applying the revenue law where administrative committees formed for that purpose would undertake resolving these disputes before being referred to the judicial stage in order to lessen the burden laid upon the judicial stage. This research discusses the importance of identifying the nature of tax disputes, concept, characteristics, and the reasons that lead to tax disputes between taxpayers and tax administration. The study attempts to explain the concept of objection, its conditions and effects. The research also addresses the administrative committees specialized in resolving tax disputes in the administrative stage shedding the light on their formation, mechanism of work, decisions, best formulas of taxpayer-tax administration resolutions for tax disputes, and best solutions for the problems facing both the taxpayer and the tax administration in resolving tax disputes arising between them via administrative means.
This research studies the visual trend when bin Mohammed Shaaban Archaeological ( 769 828 e) , in his book manuscript : ( core necklace in explaining the sugary sweetness ) . He began to translate a brief search of the archaeologists , and male e lders and his students and his works , then described the manuscript , adopted by the research.
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا