The general rule of responsibility in modern legislation is that every
fault causes harm to others, oblige the perpetrator to make
reparation. But the absolute application of this rule will cause
reluctance of the judge's decision dictated by his
conscience and
will lead to the judge's preoccupation with his main work, which is
the separation of disputes, to defend himself in the cases that may
be raised by the opponents. However, the litigants can not be held
accountable for their impartiality and their proper application of the
law. Therefore, the legislator has given the litigants the right to hold
the judge accountable through a case of dissent.
the research aim to determine what is the electronic arbitration as a term
and concept and then the understanding of substantive and
procedural legal aspects, all this as the way to resolve electronic
commerce disputes.
This paper seeks to compare how the administrative disputes are seen before the
Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional law or
regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Cour
t or the
Supreme Administrative Court in Jordan and Egypt.
Therefore, this study aims to highlight how the administrative disputes are seen
before the Supreme Constitutional Court in relating to allegation of a Non-constitutional
law or regulation relates to adjudicate in the case seeing before the Administrative Court or
the Supreme Administrative Court.
It is true that prior to the enacting of the Administrative Justice Act No. 27 of 2014 ,
the Jordanian legislator used to deal with the High Court of Justice as one of the special
judicial authorities, which may raise the case of allegation of unconstitutionality directly,
similar to the Court of Cassation.
Unlike the substantive Court which sees the case, the Jordan legislator obliged it to
raise the allegation of unconstitutionality to the Court of Cassation. The Court of Cassation
will decide whether to raise the appeal of unconstitutionality or not.
As for the Egyptian context, Egypt depends on the law of the State Council No. 48 of
1979. This law 1979 entrusted to Court of Administrative Justice Administrative Court and
the Supreme Administrative Court to raise alleged unconstitutionality law directly to the
Supreme Constitutional Court.
The present research addresses one of the new and important financial and taxation
issues, namely: the resolution of tax disputes via administrative means. It seeks out to find
resolutions for tax disputes that arise between the taxpayer and the ta
x administration when
applying the revenue law where administrative committees formed for that purpose would
undertake resolving these disputes before being referred to the judicial stage in order to
lessen the burden laid upon the judicial stage. This research discusses the importance of
identifying the nature of tax disputes, concept, characteristics, and the reasons that lead to
tax disputes between taxpayers and tax administration.
The study attempts to explain the concept of objection, its conditions and effects. The
research also addresses the administrative committees specialized in resolving tax disputes
in the administrative stage shedding the light on their formation, mechanism of work,
decisions, best formulas of taxpayer-tax administration resolutions for tax disputes, and
best solutions for the problems facing both the taxpayer and the tax administration in
resolving tax disputes arising between them via administrative means.
This research studies the visual trend when bin Mohammed
Shaaban Archaeological ( 769 828 e) , in his book manuscript : (
core necklace in explaining the sugary sweetness ) .
He began to translate a brief search of the archaeologists , and male
e
lders and his students and his works , then described the
manuscript , adopted by the research.