This approach discusses the Causality principal in ancient Iraqain civilization trying
to answer the important question which is:
Did the Iraqian thought believe in Causality and depend on it?
Did Iraqian Myths include this principle?
And if the
answer is yes, can we say that the ancient Iraqian Causality is similar to
the temporary scientific Causality which dependson stationary lows in all cases?
We will try to answer these questions depending on our understanding of the ancient
Iraqian world:
What is the relationship among its existents?
What are the powers which control this world and how?
And how much man canchangethe destiny of the world?
These questions will be answered depending on the ancient Iraqian Myths trying to
highlight importance of this civilization which have affected humanity.
This research aims to shed light on the importance of religion in the life of any
human society, and that the mind regulates the lives of the people and is considered as a
revelation which guides the minds and thus achieve the integrity of the huma
n soul and
stability, as it is important in the life of the community is the one who ensures justice and
equality between people.
This research deals with the social role of religion through religious definition, and
define the place of religion in society, the basic components of religious system, the core
of the religion ingredients (belief, myth, weather), offer some theories that addressed the
relationship between religion and society (Ibn Khaldun, Karl Marx, Max Weber , Emile
Durkheim), and finally a conclusion and a summary of the role of religion in social life.
This research studies the process of symbol transition from psychoanalysis to other
scientific and philosophical fields, especially hermeneutics and Paul Ricoeur's
interpretation theory. In fact, this research studies what the interpretation theory
has done
to the concept of symbolism. The latter migrates to it from psychoanalysis which forms for
Freud an essential basis in his study of the kinds of neurosis and psychopathy. Actually, his
goal is to make symbolism contributes to get scientific results. Thus, this symbolism
should be put in an attire of what the interpretive has called the concept of mythologization
to reach the work which the interpretation will do and consider too as an essential activity
to eliminate mythologization from the domain of the symbol.
Paul Ricoeur, based on the interpretive, has taken upon himself to discuss directly Freud's
works. He tries in these discussions to understand the techniques of psychoanalysis to
handle the basic Freudian conceptions to enable the interpretive to reread Freud through
symbolism and mythology. Thus, this research illustrates how Ricoeur depends on the
inquisitive thought, i.e. through questioning deeds and words. The research clarifies this
point through discussions we try to make as critical as possible in order to understand the
results of the interpretation theory that brings out the symbol and myth, in terms of the
psychoanalytic experimental exercise, in order to create the interpretive theory itself. This
takes place after the symbol becomes an important part of the displacement-andcompensation
processes within the texts which are subjected to interpretation after the
interpretive has managed demythologization.