Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The Execution of the Electronic Administrative Decision

القرار الإداري الالكتروني ونفاذه

1939   3   1   0.0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2013
  fields Low Sciences
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The administrative decision is the most important mean of expressing the will of the public administration. Such decision is one of the important subject-matters of administrative law, which is distinguished by being flexible and developed, as in consequence, it fits to have the capacity for all recent developments of administrative life. The recent developments of administrative life impose on legal researchers to search for ideas and new means, where the electronic government is the most significant one, which enable the public administration to use recent technological means in order to provide its services to the public. This requires the administration to express its will through releasing its administrative decisions by using the same electronic means. We try through this research to deal with the most important subject-matter of the electronic administrative decision, which is the execution of such decision. The execution creates the legal consequences of such decision, where we have to analyze the essence of the electronic administrative decision and means of executing such decision against individuals and the administration itself.

References used
بو الليل، إبراهيم الدسوقي، 2000 ،الجوانب القانونية للتعامل عبر وسائل الاتصال الحديثة، بحث مقدم إلى مؤتمر (القانون والكمبيوتر والإنترنت) عقد في كلية الشريعة والقانون بجامعة الإمارات، مايو.
4 ،التوقيع الالكتروني ومدى حجيته في الإثبات، بحث مقدم ضمن أعمال مؤتمر القانون والحاسوب، جامعة اليرموك، الأردن.
حلمي، محمود، 1962 ،سريان القرار الإداري من حيث الزمان، رسالة دكتوراه، كلية الحقوق، جامعة القاهرة.
rate research

Read More

In this research, we examined the nature of these contracts. The research dealt with its concept and the reasons for the emergence of this type of contract, which is not very different from the traditional contracts in terms of its structure, method of conclusion and methods of implementation and proof.
The move to the principle of separation of powers in its relative meaning has a clear impact in achieving the confusion between the legal works of the state authorities. Therefore, it was necessary to search for clear criteria to identify the legal nature for those works, especially that they differ in terms of the legal system governing them. These criteria are important in distinguishing the administrative decisions form the other works which the state authorities do, especially that they are an effective tool within the hand of the administration in the face of individuals being subject to the judicial control on the one hand, and that they are liable to be canceled and modified by the administration on the other hand. In addition, the state is responsible for the harm caused by these acts to individuals. The jurisprudence and the judiciary are swinging between the two criteria even if one of them overshadows the other. This research aims to demonstrate the criteria used in distinguishing the administrative decision from the other legal works, as well as the standpoint of the Syrian, Egyptian and French jurisprudence and judiciary regarding this issue.
The administrative judiciary is specialized with halting the implementation of the defected administration resolutions with unlawfulness to provide protection for people who are subject to these resolutions. However such protection requires the av ailability of several conditions which are required by the administrative judiciary lest prohibiting any abuse in halting the implementation of the administration resolutions, or disabling them without reasonable cause. As this research will introduce and discuss the concept of these conditions and their influence on halting the implementation.
In this research, we will define competent administrative judiciary for control on decision of penal cancellation of administrative contract (at first) and clarifying span of control (at second), until reaching to define of what administrative judiciary has powers against decision of penal cancellation of contract in case of its illegality (at third).
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا