تشهد الامتحانات في النظام التعليمي في سوريا نموّاً مضطرداً مع ازدياد عدد الامتحانات التي تحدده المدارس و الكليّات سنويّاً بمقدار ثلاث أضعاف. و قد أدّى هذا التضخّم الامتحاني إلي ولادة 'testocracy' مقدّمة تحدّيات جديدة للممتحَنين و الممتحنين معاً. و من بين كل الامتحانات التي يخوضها الطلاب السوريون, يعتبر امتحان الشهادة الثانويّة الأكثر أهميّة. في هذا البحث ، نحاول تسليط الضوء على جزء واحد من هذا الامتحان ، وهو امتحان الشهادة الثانويّة للغة الإنجليزية. ضمن الخطوط العريضة للاختبار اللغوي ، استهدفنا التحقيق في إمكانية التنبؤ بأوجه معينة من تأثير الاختبار من خلال الفحص الدقيق لنموذج الاختبار بمعزل عن العوامل الأخرى في بيئة التعليم و التعلم.
Testing in the Syrian educational system has been growing in the past six years with the average number of tests that schools and colleges set every year increased three-folds. This test inflation paved the way to the birth of a ‘testocracy’ that brought about new challenges for stakeholders and test developers. Of all the tests that Syrian students take, the National Baccalaureate Examination (NBE from here onwards) is the most critical. In the present research we try to shed light on one part of this test, namely the NBE of English language. Within the broad lines of language testing, we aimed to investigate the possibility of predicting certain facets of test impact via close examination of the test template in isolation from other factors in the teaching/learning environment.
References used
Alderson, J.C. & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14: 115-29.
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13: 257-279.
Brindley, G. (2002). Issues in language assessment. In The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Ed. Robert B. Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 459- 470.
Carroll, J. B. (1961). Fundamental considerations in language testing. In Language Testing and Assessment. Ed. A. J. Kunnan. New York: Rutledge, 43- 51.
Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, L. (2008). Washback, impact and consequences. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Education. Ed. E. Shohamy and N.H. Hornberger, 2nd Ed. Language Testing and Assessment, 7. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC, 349-364.
Cheng, L., Sun, Y. & Ma J. (2015). Review of washback research literature within Kane's argument-based validation framework. Language Testing, 48 (4): 436-470.
Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished manuscript, University of Reading.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madaus, G. F., (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In Critical Issues in Curriculum: Eighty-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Ed. Tanner, L.N. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 83-121.
Madaus, G. F. (1985). Public policy and the testing profession: You’ve never had it so good? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 4: 5–11.
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13: 241–256.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
MOE. (2016). Syrian ministry of education: annual educational review (report): Part 1. Damascus: MOE Archive Department.
Rajab, T. (2013). Developing whole-class interactive teaching: meeting the training needs of Syrian EFL secondary school teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/3868. (Accessed: 12 Jan, 2016).
SANA. (2017). http://www.sana.sy/?p=20108 (Accessed: 14 July, 2017).
Oller, J. W. Jr. (1973). Discrete-point tests versus tests of integrative skills. In Language Testing and Assessment. Ed. A. J. Kunnan. New York: Rutledge, 60- 87.
Wall, D., & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10: 41–69.
Wall, D. (1996). Introducing new tests into traditional systems: insights from general education and from innovation theory. Language Testing, 13: 334–357.
Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28:499-509.
Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations and Cambridge University Press.
Wall, D. (2012). Washback. In The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Eds. Glenn F. and Fred D. New York: Routledge University Press, 79-92.
Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing, 13(3): 318–333.
Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. In Washback in Language Testing. Eds. L. Cheng and Y. Watanabe. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 19-36.
Winke, P. (2011). Evaluating the validity of a high-stakes ESL test: why teachers’ perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly,45 (4): 628-660.
Xie, Q. and Andrews, S. (2013). Do test design and uses influence test preparation? Testing a model of washback with structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 30 (1): 49 –70.