شهد العالم في السنوات الأخيرة عدة تحولات سياسية و اقتصادية و أيديولوجية و عسكرية. و برز وضع دولي جديد أثّر على العلاقات الدولية، و خصوصاً في طريقة معالجة مختلف المشاكل و القضايا المطروحة. كما أثر على تطبيق المبادئ التي يقوم عليها القانون الدولي، كمبدأ سيادة الدول و المساواة في السيادة و مبدأ حقوق الإنسان، و مبدأ عدم التدخل في الشؤون الداخلية للدول و غيرها من المبادئ. و تبعاً لهذه الوضعية تمَّ تشكل الخارطة العالمية مع بروز قطب سياسي و اقتصادي وحيد، ففقد العالم بذلك توازنه الاستراتيجي، و سيطرت على العلاقات الدولية النزعة الأحادية التي برزت بالخصوص في مجال أخذ القرار العالمي، و معالجة مختلف القضايا و المشاكل المطروحة في العالم، مما أدى إلى المساس بدور الأمم المتحدة، و بقية المنظمات الدولية الحكومية، و غير الحكومية التي تجمع منظمات حقوق الإنسان على اعتبار أن ما جرى في العراق و يجري في ليبيا كارثة إنسانية بكل المقاييس، من خلال التجاوزات التي ارتكبتها و ترتكبها الولايات المتحدة من خلال القفز على الشرعية الدولية و اختلاق مبررات غير واقعية لشن الحروب و العمليات العسكرية، و ما تشهده من انتهاكات خطيرة لحقوق الإنسان المعترف بها دولياً من خلال معاهدات دولية تعدّ الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية طرفاً في أغلبها.
In the last few years the world faced many political, economical, ideological and
military changes, leading to the emergence of a new international situation. These changes
had their effects on the international relations especially in the method of dealing with
different issues and problems. They also affected on applying the principles on which the
international law is based such as sovereignty, equality in sovereignty, the principles of
human rights and the principle of not interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.
On these bases a new international map is formed with the emergence of one political and
economical pole. As a consequence, the world has lost its strategic balance and the onepole
trend has dominated the international relations and has manifested itself in the
international decision-making and the current world issues. This, in turn, has compromised
the role of the United Nations and other international government and non-government
organizations that comprise the human rights organizations on the bases that what
happened in Iraq and happening in Libya are considered a human disaster in all measures.
Through the trespasses that the United States has committed, and still committing, by
jumping over the international legitimacy and the contradictions in the unrealistic
justifications for waging wars and military actions and the consequent violations of
internationally admitted human rights through international treaties, for all these, the
United States is considered part of most of them.
References used
See 2005 World Summit Outcome, General Assembly Resolution 60/1, para. 138-139, U.N. Doc. A/60/L.1( Oct.24,2005). Available at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public0documents/un/unpan021752.pdf
(See 2005 World Summit Outcome, General Assembly Resolution 60/1, para. 138-139, U.N. Doc. A/60/L.1( Oct.24,2005
International Coalition for the responsibility to protect, The crisis in Libya, available at http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/crisis/crisis-in-Libya
The issue of human rights is one of the most important issues that are still on the stage at all times and permanently, especially on the political scene and these are the ones that have taken the lead and are the subject of global and domestic atten
American foreign policy is closely related to domestic politics, and is influenced by many official institutions And informal, at the level of foreign decision-makers, the White House, represented by the President and his advisers, foreign ministers,
Result in any State two commitments one respect for human rights
and the other counter-terrorism, the source of these commitments is
the international norms and conventions on the one hand and
constitutional texts on the other.
Interpretability or explainability is an emerging research field in NLP. From a user-centric point of view, the goal is to build models that provide proper justification for their decisions, similar to those of humans, by requiring the models to sati
This research aims to show The extent of the protection afforded
by the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the
right to challenge the legality of detention, especially in light of
what Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
shows In this regard.