Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Zionist Lobby And Its Impact On American Foreign Policy
اللوبي الصهيوني وتأثيره في السياسة الخارجية الأمريكية
843
1 0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Tishreen University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2021
fields
Low Sciences
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
ترتبط السياسية الخارجية الأمريكية بالسياسة الداخلية ارتباطاً وثيقاً، والتي تؤثر فيها العديد من المؤسسات الرسمية وغير الرسمية، فعلى مستوى صانعي القرار الخارجي يؤدي البيت الأبيض ممثلاً بالرئيس ومستشاريه، ووزراء الخارجية ووزارة الدفاع، والكونجرس الأمريكي دوراً مؤثراً في توجيه وتنفيذ السياسة الخارجية الأمريكية، كما تؤدي جماعات المصالح والضغط وعلى رأسها اللوبي الصهيوني دوراً كبيراً في التأثير على هذه المؤسسات. مرت العلاقات بين الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية والكيان الصهيوني بمراحل عدة, لعب فيها اللوبي الصهيوني دوراً بالغاً ومؤثراً في توجهات السياسة الأمريكية حيال الصراع العربي – الصهيوني في الشرق الأوسط قبل إعلان قيام الكيان الصهيوني عام 1948 ولحد الآن. لقد التقت الاستراتيجية الأمريكية مع الدور الاستراتيجي الإسرائيلي في منطقة الشرق الأوسط والذي يستطيع أن يحقق المصالح الأمريكية من خلال التوافق المشترك على العديد من المبادئ كالمحافظة على أمن الكيان الصهيوني والضغط على الدول العربية من أجل الاعتراف بها وتصنيف الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية كحليف رئيس للكيان الصهيوني وتأمين حصول الولايات المتحدة وحلفائها على إمدادات البترول في منطقة الشرق الأوسط. سورية كونها إحدى الدول العربية وضمن دول الشرق الأوسط كانت محط أنظار كل من الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية والكيان الصهيوني خاصة نحاول من خلال هذه الدراسة توضيح دور هذا اللوبي في التحريض والحرب الأخيرة على سورية والمصالح والمكاسب التي حققها الكيان الصهيوني من هذه الحرب.
American foreign policy is closely related to domestic politics, and is influenced by many official institutions And informal, at the level of foreign decision-makers, the White House, represented by the President and his advisers, foreign ministers, the Ministry of Defense, and the US Congress, plays an influential role in directing and implementing American foreign policy, and interest and pressure groups, led by the Zionist lobby, play a major role in influencing these institutions. Relations between the United States of America and the Zionist entity went through several stages, in which the Zionist lobby played an extreme and influential role in the orientations of American policy towards the Arab-Zionist conflict in the Middle East before the declaration of the Zionist entity in1948 until now. The American strategy has met with the Israeli strategic role in the Middle East, which can achieve American interests through mutual agreement on many principles such as preserving the security of the Zionist entity and pressure on Arab countries to recognize it and classify the United States of America as a major ally of the Zionist entity and secure states' access United and its allies on oil supplies in the Middle East. Syria being one of the Arab countries and within the countries of the Middle East was the focus of attention of the United States of America and the Zionist entity in particular Through this study, we are trying to clarify the role of this lobby in incitement and the recent war on Syria and the interests and gains that the Zionist entity has achieved from this war.
References used
Abu Ghneim ، Mhammed . The role of American institutions in implementing the foreign policy of the United States in Palestine ، Master Thesis ، Gaza Academy for Administration and Politics ، Year 2013 ، p45
rate research
Read More
After the research and study conducted about the Zionist Lobby in the United
States, we've come to the conclusion that the Zionist Lobby is one of the most organized,
funded and pervasive lobbies in American society. This makes it stronger and more
effective and the impact on the decision-making in the United States. This enabled the
Zionist Lobby to exploit the abilities and potential and influence to serve the Zionist
entity, as well as his quest to associate the Israeli interests with the supreme interests of the
USA. Therefore, the United States' duty to do everything that would maintain the existence
and sustainability of "Israel", through supporting it politically, economically and militarily.
Indeed, this is evident when we look at the biased American attitude, in favor of Israel in
relation to the issue of Arab- Israeli conflict and the peace process in the Middle East. This
prompted many observers and political analysts to say that the American foreign policy is
the policy of the "Israeli" par excellence.
This paper reports on the relationship between political Interests and the process of issuing international accounting standards. The basic hypothesis of the paper is proved by taking the situation of USA and the effect of political interests in the
Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) directly and in the International Accounting Standard Committee (IASC) indirectly as well.
The (IASC) tried to eliminate differences and deepen similarities through propose many alternatives. Instead, it had started decrease alternatives, which reflects the political dimension. Besides getting the international feature. On the other hand, all IASs, historically, had come after Putting both findings together, (IAS) and (US GAAP) do not appear to be substantially different; rather they seem to be of similar quality. differently issuing American accounting standards which strength the basic hypothesis of this research and reveal the effect of American interests in issuing (IASs) and forbid undeveloped countries to utilize accounting as a tool serving economic development The paper provided results and recommendations in this record.
In the last few years the world faced many political, economical, ideological and
military changes, leading to the emergence of a new international situation. These changes
had their effects on the international relations especially in the method o
f dealing with
different issues and problems. They also affected on applying the principles on which the
international law is based such as sovereignty, equality in sovereignty, the principles of
human rights and the principle of not interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.
On these bases a new international map is formed with the emergence of one political and
economical pole. As a consequence, the world has lost its strategic balance and the onepole
trend has dominated the international relations and has manifested itself in the
international decision-making and the current world issues. This, in turn, has compromised
the role of the United Nations and other international government and non-government
organizations that comprise the human rights organizations on the bases that what
happened in Iraq and happening in Libya are considered a human disaster in all measures.
Through the trespasses that the United States has committed, and still committing, by
jumping over the international legitimacy and the contradictions in the unrealistic
justifications for waging wars and military actions and the consequent violations of
internationally admitted human rights through international treaties, for all these, the
United States is considered part of most of them.
The study addressed the most important phases of Turkish foreign policy since the
establishment of the modern Turkish republic in 1923. And the principles govering it. Then
it focused on the new trends of foreign policy after the Jastice and develo
pment Islamic
rooted party came to power in Turkey 2002. Especially the strategic depth, reset problems
or zero problems with neighbors and new ottomanism.
The study concluded that the basic tenets which guided turkey's foreign policy since
the founding of the republic included caution and pragmatism.
This project is a Zionist-American update of those projects which have been developed and planned by the Colonial and Zionist departments, which were designed to separate the bright Arab world for western parts, by planting the Zionist entity in the
heart of the Arab world, and after a series of conventions and treaties
that paved the way for carrying out such as the Convention Sykes-Picot colonial in 1916 and the Balfour Declaration in 1917. Thus, what is happening in the Arab world cannot be separated from the scheme of the US-Zionist-Western European
targets to penetrate the Arab region as a whole, in order to synthesize weak statelets which would be easy to control, and thus plunder the riches and capabilities of the Arabs, and to ensure the security "of Israel." In addition, it also reached the
objectives of those countries working towards the fragmentation and occupation of the Arab world, as well as the elimination of governments and nationalist parties, thus ending the national project and the Arab system.
One of the tools, or the colonial scenarios, posed to achieve this by the owners of the American-Zionist project is to hit the kind of gender in the Arab region, whether sectarian, ethnic or national. And thus ignite sectarian wars and civil between the components of the Arab community until you return the peoples of the region to the pre-national state, which leads to spread chaos and unrest and insecurity, leading to serious implications and repercussions of the disastrous walks of life, different cultural, political, social, economic and others. What progress allows the right climate for the division and fragmentation of the Arab states towards the character of a sectarian and nationalist and sectarian and ethnic, and thus draw a new map for the Arab region to serve the interests of the colonial powers? This climate of chaos
gives justifications and arguments of the States project owners a Zionist-American intervention in the affairs of Arab countries, and the violation of their sovereignty and control over their own resources, whether oil or gas, or take advantage of its strategic location in ways to control global trade. ...
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
