Do you want to publish a course? Click here

The moral basis of scientific knowledge in popper philosophy

الأساس الأخلاقي للمعرفة العلمية في الفلسفة البوبرية

2119   0   26   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2013
  fields Philosphy
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

The research addressed a critical analytical study of the moral basis of scientific knowledge from the viewpoint of the contemporary philosopher of science Karl popper, throughout his opinion on the fact that scientific knowledge is incomplete when not based on cognitive approach and moral content which protect it from slipping and error, stressing the close relationship and the strong correlation between knowledge and ethics, which if deviated affected the standards of science as a whole. Results showed that knowledge, generally, is everyone's right to possess, threr resides the truth, and to reach this truth there must be many methodologies, says popper, the most important of which is the critical approach and rational dialog, by which we realize that the human makes mistakes and, consequently, his knowledge may be wrong, and to access the real scientific knowledge the skeptical approach should be followed in which the premise is tested in different ways. Popper pointed out that the insightful human recipient can exercise these logical operations, and the insightful human is naturaly forgivable non- fanatic, open to criticism, non-monopolistic of knowledge and therefore the basis of knowledge is purely ethical, without which knowledge loses its meaning and credibility.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
يتناول البحث دراسة تحليلية نقدية للأساس الأخلاقي الذي تُبنى عليه المعرفة العلمية من وجهة نظر فيلسوف العلم المعاصر كارل بوبر. يوضح البحث أن المعرفة العلمية تكون ناقصة عندما لا تُؤسس على نهج معرفي ومضمون أخلاقي يحميها من الانزلاق والخطأ. يؤكد بوبر على وجود علاقة وثيقة بين المعرفة والأخلاق، مشيرًا إلى أن الإنسان المتبصر هو الذي يستطيع ممارسة العمليات المنطقية والنقدية للوصول إلى المعرفة العلمية الحقيقية. كما يشدد على أن المعرفة يجب أن تكون متاحة للجميع وأنها تتطلب منهجيات متعددة للوصول إلى الحقيقة، أهمها النهج النقدي والحوار العقلاني. يتناول البحث أيضًا أهمية التسامح والانفتاح على النقد كجزء من الأساس الأخلاقي للمعرفة العلمية، ويشير إلى أن المعرفة العلمية تتطور من خلال الحذف والاستبعاد وليس من خلال التأكيد والإثبات.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: يُعتبر البحث مهمًا في تسليط الضوء على العلاقة بين الأخلاق والمعرفة العلمية، ولكنه قد يكون قد أغفل بعض الجوانب العملية لتطبيق هذه الأفكار في الحياة اليومية وفي الأوساط الأكاديمية. كما أن التركيز الكبير على النهج النقدي قد يجعل البعض يتساءل عن كيفية تحقيق توازن بين النقد والبناء في تطوير المعرفة. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، يمكن أن يُنظر إلى بعض الأفكار على أنها مثالية إلى حد ما، مما يجعل من الصعب تطبيقها في سياقات معينة حيث تكون الضغوط العملية والسياسية كبيرة.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو الأساس الأخلاقي الذي يؤكد عليه كارل بوبر في المعرفة العلمية؟

    يؤكد كارل بوبر على أن المعرفة العلمية يجب أن تُؤسس على نهج معرفي ومضمون أخلاقي يحميها من الانزلاق والخطأ، مشددًا على العلاقة الوثيقة بين المعرفة والأخلاق.

  2. ما هي المنهجيات التي يرى بوبر أنها ضرورية للوصول إلى الحقيقة العلمية؟

    يرى بوبر أن الوصول إلى الحقيقة العلمية يتطلب اتباع منهجيات عديدة، أهمها النهج النقدي والحوار العقلاني، بالإضافة إلى اختبار الفرضيات بطرق مختلفة.

  3. كيف يصف بوبر الإنسان المتبصر في سياق المعرفة العلمية؟

    يصف بوبر الإنسان المتبصر بأنه كائن مسامح، غير متعصب، منفتح على النقد ويقبل أن يُنتقد من الآخرين، وغير محتكر للمعرفة.

  4. ما هي النتائج التي توصل إليها البحث بشأن تطور المعرفة العلمية؟

    توصل البحث إلى أن المعرفة العلمية تتطور وفق الطريقة السلبية التي تتضمن عمليات الحذف والاستبعاد والتخلص وليس التأكيد والإثبات، وأنها تتطلب أساسًا أخلاقيًا لضمان مصداقيتها.


References used
POPPER , KARL , The Open Society and its Enemies ,Vol . I , The Spell of plato , Princeton University press , Princeton , New Jersey , 1971
WILLIAM A. GARTON , Karl popper and the social sciences, state university of New York , Pirecs , Albany , 2006
rate research

Read More

This research highlights on an important and fundamental issue of the 20th century's most important philosophers, "Gaston Bachelard", which is the analytical approach to scientific knowledge of this philosopher and the role played by "Gaston Bachel ard" in this approach in formulating a set of scientific concepts that enriched epistemology as the concept of the epistemological obstacle ,The concept of estrangement and the concept of undo time, with concentration on importance of the dialectical relationship between these concepts and their role in the development of scientific knowledge.
This research tries to examine the concept of self within the framework of modern philosophy and contemporary philosophy, in an attempt to highlight the role of this concept in the formation of most of the philosophical doctrines from the Greek era to the contemporary philosophy, through modern philosophy. In this research, we will attempt to study the formation of this concept in the framework of modern and contemporary philosophy, to show the philosophers' interest in this concept and the extent to which the concept is linked to the clarify their own philosophy. Therefore, the research attempts to provide a follow-up reading of the concept of self in a comparative historical context, in which we demonstrate that this concept is still alive in contemporary philosophy, albeit with different names, such as reason, mind or feeling. We will conclude from this the importance of the concept of self in the philosophical context, which still occupies an important space in the thinking of modern and contemporary philosophers. Here we will try to ask several questions, including what is the dualism of the soul and body. How can the soul be a logical synthesis, an emanated mind, or a subjective feeling? In this research, we will try to answer these questions and other questions that will appear in the context of the research.
Scientific claim verification can help the researchers to easily find the target scientific papers with the sentence evidence from a large corpus for the given claim. Some existing works propose pipeline models on the three tasks of abstract retrieva l, rationale selection and stance prediction. Such works have the problems of error propagation among the modules in the pipeline and lack of sharing valuable information among modules. We thus propose an approach, named as ARSJoint, that jointly learns the modules for the three tasks with a machine reading comprehension framework by including claim information. In addition, we enhance the information exchanges and constraints among tasks by proposing a regularization term between the sentence attention scores of abstract retrieval and the estimated outputs of rational selection. The experimental results on the benchmark dataset SciFact show that our approach outperforms the existing works.
Rationality is by far the luckiest philosophical concept in so far as its controversial status is concerned. It is also one of the terms most liable to rejection, criticism and analysis. Hence, our paper is an attempt to unscramble the controversy re lating to tuning the term of rationality into a concept that denotes multiple significations in the era of modern philosophy, and which are considered the real foundation of what today's world has reached in its intellectual, scientific and social aspects. According to this terminological and conceptual context, we have tried in this paper to shed special light on the genealogy of the concept of rationality, its origins and evolution as a trend in modern European thought, given that it is a signifier that denotes the priority of the mind, and which derives from various meanings that are complementary at times, yet contradictory at others, whereby carrying multiple significations, that vary in accordance with its field of use. With a certain degree of special attention, we have also tried to glean some of the most basic meanings associated with the term of rationality. We hope that this way we may be able to clarify the obscurity that engulfs the term, something which has caused its ambiguity, and thus our confused understanding of the philosophy of modernity.
This research attempts to shed light on the issue of growing or uncontrolled population growth, especially from the point of view of Robert Maltus as one of the inhabitants who left their silence in this area. This study also addresses several key aspects: First, the reasons behind population growth such as migration, low mortality due to improved health care, attention to women's reproductive health and availability of medication. Second: the relationship between both the population increase and the food problem, from the point of view of Maltos, who believes that there is a direct relationship between the two variables, the more the population has worsened the problem of food. Thirdly, reference is made to the main effects that unbalanced population growth may have on the environment on the one hand, such as continued logging, population expansion, the need for fresh drinking water, pollution of air, water, soil, and the inability to absorb waste. On the social side, poverty, unemployment and the low social level, . The most prominent solutions presented by Maltos to solve the population problem include ethical barriers and natural contraindications. Fifth: To review some attitudes on the population issue such as the theory of Thomas Sadler, James Stewart, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, and to indicate the extent of intersection or difference with the theory of Maltos.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا