Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe moral basis of scientific knowledge in popper philosophy
الأساس الأخلاقي للمعرفة العلمية في الفلسفة البوبرية
1967
0 26
0
(
0
)
Added by
Tishreen University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2013
fields
Philosphy
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
لقد تناول البحث دراسة تحليلية نقدية للأساس الأخلاقي الذي تُبنى عليه المعرفة العلمية من وجهة نظر فيلسوف العلم المعاصر كارل بوبر، و ذلك من خلال تبيان رأيه في كون المعرفة العلمية معرفة ناقصة عندما لا تُؤسس على نهجٍ معرفي و مضمونٍ أخلاقي يحميها من الانزلاق و الخطأ، مؤكداً على وجود علاقةٍ وثيقة و ارتباطٍ قوي بين المعرفة و الأخلاق، فإذا انحرفت مالت معها معيارية العلم بأكملها. أظهرت النتائج أن المعرفة عامة، من حق الجميع امتلاكها، ففيها تكمن الحقيقة، و لبلوغ هذه الحقيقة لابد من اتباع منهجيات عديدة كما يقول بوبر، أهمها النهج النقدي و الحوار العقلاني، الذي ندرك بواسطتهما أن الإنسان يخطئ و بالتالي فمعرفته قد تكون خاطئة، و للوصول إلى المعرفة العلمية الحقيقة لابد من الطريق التكذيبي الذي نخضع فيه الفرضية لأنواعٍ مختلفة من الاختبارات. أشار بوبر إلى أن الإنسان المتلقي المتبصر هو الذي يستطيع ممارسة هذه العمليات المنطقية، و الإنسان المتبصر هو كائن مسامح بطبيعة الأحوال، غير متعصب، منفتح، ينقد و يقبل أن ينتقده الآخرون، و غير محتكر للمعرفة, و على هذا الأساس تُبنى المعرفة على قاعدة، حيث تكون قاعدتها أخلاقية بحتة، و دونها تفقد معناها و مصداقيتها.
The research addressed a critical analytical study of the moral basis of scientific knowledge from the viewpoint of the contemporary philosopher of science Karl popper, throughout his opinion on the fact that scientific knowledge is incomplete when not based on cognitive approach and moral content which protect it from slipping and error, stressing the close relationship and the strong correlation between knowledge and ethics, which if deviated affected the standards of science as a whole. Results showed that knowledge, generally, is everyone's right to possess, threr resides the truth, and to reach this truth there must be many methodologies, says popper, the most important of which is the critical approach and rational dialog, by which we realize that the human makes mistakes and, consequently, his knowledge may be wrong, and to access the real scientific knowledge the skeptical approach should be followed in which the premise is tested in different ways. Popper pointed out that the insightful human recipient can exercise these logical operations, and the insightful human is naturaly forgivable non- fanatic, open to criticism, non-monopolistic of knowledge and therefore the basis of knowledge is purely ethical, without which knowledge loses its meaning and credibility.
References used
POPPER , KARL , The Open Society and its Enemies ,Vol . I , The Spell of plato , Princeton University press , Princeton , New Jersey , 1971
WILLIAM A. GARTON , Karl popper and the social sciences, state university of New York , Pirecs , Albany , 2006
rate research
Read More
This research highlights on an important and fundamental issue of the 20th century's most
important philosophers, "Gaston Bachelard", which is the analytical approach to scientific
knowledge of this philosopher and the role played by "Gaston Bachel
ard" in this approach
in formulating a set of scientific concepts that enriched epistemology as the concept of the
epistemological obstacle ,The concept of estrangement and the concept of undo time, with
concentration on importance of the dialectical relationship between these concepts and
their role in the development of scientific knowledge.
This research tries to examine the concept of self within the framework of modern
philosophy and contemporary philosophy, in an attempt to highlight the role of this
concept in the formation of most of the philosophical doctrines from the Greek era
to the
contemporary philosophy, through modern philosophy.
In this research, we will attempt to study the formation of this concept in the
framework of modern and contemporary philosophy, to show the philosophers' interest in
this concept and the extent to which the concept is linked to the clarify their own
philosophy. Therefore, the research attempts to provide a follow-up reading of the concept
of self in a comparative historical context, in which we demonstrate that this concept is still
alive in contemporary philosophy, albeit with different names, such as reason, mind or
feeling.
We will conclude from this the importance of the concept of self in the philosophical
context, which still occupies an important space in the thinking of modern and
contemporary philosophers. Here we will try to ask several questions, including what is the
dualism of the soul and body. How can the soul be a logical synthesis, an emanated mind,
or a subjective feeling? In this research, we will try to answer these questions and other
questions that will appear in the context of the research.
Scientific claim verification can help the researchers to easily find the target scientific papers with the sentence evidence from a large corpus for the given claim. Some existing works propose pipeline models on the three tasks of abstract retrieva
l, rationale selection and stance prediction. Such works have the problems of error propagation among the modules in the pipeline and lack of sharing valuable information among modules. We thus propose an approach, named as ARSJoint, that jointly learns the modules for the three tasks with a machine reading comprehension framework by including claim information. In addition, we enhance the information exchanges and constraints among tasks by proposing a regularization term between the sentence attention scores of abstract retrieval and the estimated outputs of rational selection. The experimental results on the benchmark dataset SciFact show that our approach outperforms the existing works.
Rationality is by far the luckiest philosophical concept in so far as its controversial status is concerned. It is also one of the terms most liable to rejection, criticism and analysis. Hence, our paper is an attempt to unscramble the controversy re
lating to tuning the term of rationality into a concept that denotes multiple significations in the era of modern philosophy, and which are considered the real foundation of what today's world has reached in its intellectual, scientific and social aspects.
According to this terminological and conceptual context, we have tried in this paper to shed special light on the genealogy of the concept of rationality, its origins and evolution as a trend in modern European thought, given that it is a signifier that denotes the priority of the mind, and which derives from various meanings that are complementary at times, yet contradictory at others, whereby carrying multiple significations, that vary in accordance with its field of use. With a certain degree of special attention, we have also tried to glean some of the most basic meanings associated with the term of rationality. We hope that this way we may be able to clarify the obscurity that engulfs the term, something which has caused its ambiguity, and thus our confused understanding of the philosophy of modernity.
This research attempts to shed light on the issue of growing or uncontrolled
population growth, especially from the point of view of Robert Maltus as one of the
inhabitants who left their silence in this area. This study also addresses several key
aspects:
First, the reasons behind population growth such as migration, low mortality due to
improved health care, attention to women's reproductive health and availability of
medication. Second: the relationship between both the population increase and the food
problem, from the point of view of Maltos, who believes that there is a direct relationship
between the two variables, the more the population has worsened the problem of food.
Thirdly, reference is made to the main effects that unbalanced population growth may have
on the environment on the one hand, such as continued logging, population expansion, the
need for fresh drinking water, pollution of air, water, soil, and the inability to absorb waste.
On the social side, poverty, unemployment and the low social level, . The most prominent
solutions presented by Maltos to solve the population problem include ethical barriers and
natural contraindications. Fifth: To review some attitudes on the population issue such as
the theory of Thomas Sadler, James Stewart, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, and to indicate
the extent of intersection or difference with the theory of Maltos.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
