Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userMorphological Approach of Shehab Al-Khafaji on his Commentary on Al-Baydawi Explanation
المنهج الصرفي عند الشهاب الخفاجي في حاشيته على تفسير البيضاوي
1247
0 36
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
سأتناول في هذا البحث الشهاب الخفاجي من الناحية الصرفية, تجلية لدوره في هذا الميدان بما ضمنه من آراء و توجيهات في حاشيته على تفسير البيضاوي المسماة (عناية القاضي و كفاية الراضي).
I will study in this research Shehab Al- Khafaji Morphologically، in order to shed light on his role in this field، including hisreviews and guidance in his book called (Enayat AlkadywakifayatAr- Rady).
References used
إصلاح المنطق، ابن السكيت/ 244 ه/، أحمد محمد شاكر وعبد السلام هارون، دار المعارف، مصر، الطبعة الثالثة، بلا تاريخ.
الأعلام, خير الدين الزركلي, دار العلم للملايين, بيروت, الطبعة الخامسة عشرة, 2002م
rate research
Read More
Some commentators were not satisfied with interpreting the Qur’anic verses and explaining the rulings and lessons deduced from them. Rather, they added to that by parsing the Holy Qur’an and citing the readings and syntactic directives in the verses,
and deposited in its interpretation many grammatical and morphological issues, and collected a number of grammarians’ sayings and their differences according to their schools and doctrines.
As one on of the sciences of the Arabic Language, this research concentrates on the morphological criticism to al-Mutanabbi's poetry by a few ancient Arab critics who were not grammarians. The introduction presents the significance, aim and methodolo
gy of the research, then follows the talk of the aspects of the morphological criticism to al-Mutanabbi's poetry through highlighting the beginnings of the morphological and syntactic criticism. Building on this, it mentions the morphologically-criticized line of verse, records the criticism, and assesses this criticism based on the principles of syntax, morphology and the statements of the eloquent Arabs.
Eventually, this research addresses the characteristics of this criticism, pointing out that such criticism carries heavy bias against Abu Tayyeb al-Mutanabbi. It neither utters the truth, nor is sincere; but tends to be envious and offensive, being follower of al-Basra school of syntax and morphology, and considering its opponents mistaken and faulty. It then mentions the important results is ends up with.
Inflectional morphology is considered one of the important
issues that occupy the concern of the Quran's paraphrasers
ALkadi ALBedhawi has a very influential book in this field"
Anwar ALtanzeel wa Asrar AL Taweel" (The lights of the
verses and th
e Explanation's Secrets ) . This ,study, in deed
comes to continue the one that AL Bedhawi and successive
scholars have started . It tackles some of the verses he has
quoted, discussed and employed to prove the theory he
conducts .
This paper seeks to study the shortcomings of son of Makl AL
Azeedi AL Muhalibi (644h) on
AL Marri’s explanation (440h) in AL Mutanabis volume tilled
with(AL Lami AL Azizi ) in his book (the shortcomings of
illustrators of AL Mutanabis volume ).
This research presents rebounds taken Abu Muhammad Allqasem
Iben Almowafaq Allurqi Allmursi (661 hijira) in his explanation of
Alljuzollia Introdudction is marked by (Almabaheth Alkamilia
Shareh Almuqadima Aljuzolia) for its sorter Abi Musa Aljuzo
li
(607hijira) he is classified (the Al-Gozolia introduction at the
grammar).
This Introdudction took wide fame in the Maghreb in particular and
adding the explanation despite being small in size prose text.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
