Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Flexible GSM Equalizer for User-Defined QoS, Based on Software Defined Radio

مسوي GSM مرن لنوعية خدمة محددة من قبل المستثمر بالاعتماد على نظم الاتصالات اللاسلكية المحددة برمجيا

828   0   9   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2008
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

In the introduction of this paper, we present a background on SDR, in section 2, we give a quick demonstration of main GSM features and ways to improve QoS in it. After a short recognition of key fading effects in section 3, we analyze in section 4 the Soft Output Viterbi Algorithm used to perform equalization tasks in GSM. In sections 5 and 6, we use simulation results to effectively categorize variable parameters of the flexible equalizer upon user defined level of QoS. We show also the importance of such approach in effectively utilizing hardware resources dedicated for performing digital signal processing tasks, and in reducing power consumption required for these tasks.

References used
B. Enrico, "The Software Radio Concept", IEEE Communications Magazine, September 2000, pp. 138-143
J. Mitola, "The Software Radio Architecture", IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1999, pp. 26-37
W.H. Tuttlebee Et al, "Software Defined Radio, Baseband Technologies for 3G Handsets and Basestations", John Wily, 2004
rate research

Read More

In the introduction of this paper, we present a background on SDR, in section 2, we give a quick demonstration of main IS-95 features and ways to improve QoS in it. After a short recognition of key fading effects in section 3, we analyze in sectio n 4 the principle of Rake reception. In section 5, we use simulation results to effectively categorize variable number of fingers of the flexible Rake receiver upon user defined level of QoS, and we show the importance of such approach in effectively utilizing hardware resources dedicated for performing digital signal processing tasks, and in reducing power consumption required for these tasks.
Software defined networks SDN is one of the most influential types of networks in information and communication technology compared to all traditional network technologies where there are many challenges, SDN is one of the most promising solutions fo r the Internet in the future and provides a strong network infrastructure with high specifications and low cost, and represents the future of the next generation of network engineering due to the easy division of networks, programming, monitoring, control and management through a central control, and the separation of control plane from the data-forwarding plane in SDN networks facilitates the process of managing and developing networks, as this technology is currently used in data centers and wireless networks, and is a solution to many of the problems faced by traditional networks. SDN networks are characterized by sufficient dynamism to deal with the different conditions of the network, and the controller is one of its most important components and is considered the smartest component in the network, and given the importance of choosing the appropriate controller according to the different parameters and conditions of the SDN network,in this research we conducted an analysis of the characteristics of Software defined Networks, The analysis relied on comparing SDN networks with the presence of a single OpenDaylight controller (ODL) and the presence of several controllers ODL, OpenDaylight controller was chosen as one of the famous controllers and it is distinguished from others as an open source and contains a distributed datastore and is designed to suit the data center environment, Taking into account the OpenFlow protocol supported on the southern interface by this controller, the research includes simulations of software defined networks topologies using the Mininet emulator, and various scenarios and parameters such as data rate, packet delay, and throughput were analyzed by the D-ITG tool.
Device to device Communications (D2D Communications) is a new promising technology, that is used to increase data exchanged volume, to expand the coverage area of base stations, core network data offloading, and to move to new frequency bands that have not been used in mobile networks before.
Morphological tasks have gained decent popularity within the NLP community in the recent years, with large multi-lingual datasets providing morphological analysis of words, either in or out of context. However, the lack of a clear linguistic definiti on for words destines the annotative work to be incomplete and mired in inconsistencies, especially cross-linguistically. In this work we expand morphological inflection of words to inflection of sentences to provide true universality disconnected from orthographic traditions of white-space usage. To allow annotation for sentence-inflection we define a morphological annotation scheme by a fixed set of inflectional features. We present a small cross-linguistic dataset including semi-manually generated simple sentences in 4 typologically diverse languages annotated according to our suggested scheme, and show that the task of reinflection gets substantially more difficult but that the change of scope from words to well-defined sentences allows interface with contextualized language models.
Decoupling the decision-making process from the data forwarding process is the heart of software-defined networks technology. One of the most important components of this technology is the controller, which is the smartest component in the network. Many of the controllers have been developed since the technology originated, and many researches have been done to compare the performance of these controllers for productivity, delay and protection. And due to the importance of selecting the appropriate controller according to different parameters and network states, we studied the performance of four controllers: Floodlight, Beacon, Nox, RYU in terms of productivity, RTT, time of establishing connection with an OpenFlow switch and the time for adding an input to the switch flow table. The results showed that the Beacon control was superior in performance when the number of switches in the network was equal to the number of processor cores used by the controller. For RTT and the time needed to add an input to the flow table, the NOX controller achieved less time. Finally, the Floodlight controller was the best in terms of establishing connection with the switch because it needed less time.

suggested questions

comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا