Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Performance Comparison Among Reactive And Proactive Routing Protocols in Vehicular Networks with Low Vehicular Density

مقارنة أداء بروتوكولات التوجيه الاستباقية و التفاعلية في شبكات العربات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة

3476   1   297   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2015
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) is a form of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, but the nodes of this network are vehicles with special equipment to enable them to communicate with each other. These networks need to implement protocols to ensure that messages are reached to their destinations and achieve the desired goal of the application. In this paper, we present an analysis of the performance of a number of major routing protocols used in these networks which protocols AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and OLSR (Optimized link state routing). This analysis is based on various parameters such as packet delivery ratio and end-to-end delay, in order to find the best protocol can be used in the network with low density. To achieve this purpose, we used a simulator OPNET_17.5. Depending on the simulation results we have obtained and the analysis and comparison of these protocols at different low density contract .We found that the protocol AODV is the best among the studied protocols under the conditions set out in this study.


Artificial intelligence review:
Research summary
تتناول هذه الدراسة تحليل أداء بروتوكولات التوجيه المختلفة في شبكات العربات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة، وهي نوع من الشبكات اللاسلكية المتنقلة (VANET). يتم التركيز على ثلاثة بروتوكولات رئيسية: AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector)، DSR (Dynamic Source Routing)، وOLSR (Optimized Link State Routing). الهدف من الدراسة هو تحديد البروتوكول الأمثل للاستخدام في شبكات العربات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة من حيث معدل تسليم الرزم والتأخير الزمني من البداية إلى النهاية. تم استخدام المحاكي OPNET_17.5 لإجراء المحاكاة وتحليل النتائج. أظهرت النتائج أن بروتوكول AODV هو الأفضل من بين البروتوكولات المدروسة في ظل الشروط المحددة، حيث يقدم أداءً متفوقًا من حيث التأخير الزمني ومعدل تسليم الرزم. توصي الدراسة باستخدام بروتوكول AODV كاستراتيجية توجيه موثوقة في البيئات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة للعربات، خاصة في التطبيقات التي تتطلب تأخيرًا زمنيًا منخفضًا.
Critical review
دراسة نقدية: على الرغم من أن الدراسة تقدم تحليلًا شاملاً لأداء بروتوكولات التوجيه في شبكات العربات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة، إلا أن هناك بعض النقاط التي يمكن تحسينها. أولاً، الدراسة تعتمد بشكل كبير على المحاكاة باستخدام برنامج OPNET_17.5، وهو ما قد لا يعكس تمامًا الأداء الفعلي للبروتوكولات في بيئات حقيقية. ثانياً، تم التركيز على عدد محدود من البروتوكولات، وكان من الممكن توسيع الدراسة لتشمل بروتوكولات أخرى قد تكون أكثر فعالية في بعض السيناريوهات. ثالثاً، لم يتم التطرق بشكل كافٍ إلى تأثير العوامل البيئية مثل الطقس والتضاريس على أداء البروتوكولات، وهو ما يمكن أن يكون له تأثير كبير في البيئات الحقيقية. وأخيرًا، كان من الممكن تقديم توصيات أكثر تفصيلية حول كيفية تحسين أداء البروتوكولات المدروسة بناءً على النتائج المستخلصة.
Questions related to the research
  1. ما هو الهدف الرئيسي من الدراسة؟

    الهدف الرئيسي من الدراسة هو تحديد البروتوكول الأمثل للاستخدام في شبكات العربات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة من حيث معدل تسليم الرزم والتأخير الزمني من البداية إلى النهاية.

  2. ما هي البروتوكولات التي تم تحليلها في الدراسة؟

    تم تحليل ثلاثة بروتوكولات رئيسية في الدراسة: AODV، DSR، وOLSR.

  3. ما هو المحاكي الذي تم استخدامه لإجراء المحاكاة وتحليل النتائج؟

    تم استخدام المحاكي OPNET_17.5 لإجراء المحاكاة وتحليل النتائج.

  4. ما هي التوصية الرئيسية التي توصلت إليها الدراسة؟

    توصي الدراسة باستخدام بروتوكول AODV كاستراتيجية توجيه موثوقة في البيئات ذات الكثافة المنخفضة للعربات، خاصة في التطبيقات التي تتطلب تأخيرًا زمنيًا منخفضًا.


References used
SHARMA, Y. and MUKHERJEE, S. Routing Protocol in VANET. International Journal of Computer Applications . Vol. 50, No.21, July 2012
SI-HO, C. and MIN-WOO, R. A Survey of Greedy Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. Smart Computing Review. vol.2, No.2, April 2012
SAINI, P. and BHAGCHANDANI, K . Modern Investigation of Issues and Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols Applied To VANET. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), Vol.2, No.2, December 2012, 2249 – 8958
rate research

Read More

The low cost, ease of deployment has exposed WSNs an attractive choice for numerous applications,like environmental monitoring applications , security applications, real time tracking, and so on. But in reality, these networks are operated on batte ry with limitations in their computation capabilities, memory, bandwidth ,so they called networks with resource constrained nature, and this impels various challenges in its design and its performance. Limited battery capacity of sensor nodes makes energy efficiency a major and challenge problem in wireless sensor networks. Thus, the routing protocols for wireless sensor networks must be energy efficient in order to maximize the network lifetime. In this paper we simulated LEACH,SEP,DEEC,TEEN routing protocols and evaluated their performance by comparing with DT routing protocol in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks on MATLAB.
A Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) is a collection of nodes forming a wireless network, but the nodes of this network are vehicles with special equipment that enable them to communicate with each other. VANET protocols have to face high challenges due to dynamically changing topologies, link breakage and low vehicular density. A suitable and effective routing protocol helps to ensure that messages are reached to their destinations and achieve the desired aim of the application. In this research, we present an analysis of the performance of two major routing protocols used in these networks, which are AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) and GPSR (Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing). This analysis is based on various parameters such as end-to-end delay and average dropped packets, in order to find the best protocol which can be used in the network with low density at the junctions. To achieve this purpose, we used a simulator OPNET_17.5. Depending on the simulation results, we have obtained and the analysis and comparison of two protocols at different low density contract. We found that GPSR protocol has better performance end-to-end delay and average dropped packets are used as the performance metrics, and is better for VANET under the low vehicular density simulation scenario at junctions.
Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks are used for data transfer. The nodes of such networks do not require presetting. They are characterized by dynamic data transfer during their movement of the nodes. MANET could be targeted by potential security breaches. Bl ack hole attack is one of the serious attacks targeting wireless AD_HOC networks through a false point whichcan absorb data and send them to another place or neglect them. This is due to the lack of central control node which is able to manage communications. This research investigates the effects of the black hole on the performance of hybrid routing protocol Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) and proactive routing protocol Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) for a variable number of mobile nodes in different speeds in a high load environment.
Ad-hoc networks has opened a new dimension in wireless networks. It allows wireless communication in the absence of central support of the contract. In these networks, there are no fixed infrastructure because the mobile nodes are continuously mak ing continuous and dynamic change in the topology. Routing protocols of mobile ad-hoc networks differ from the existing internet protocols which are designed for the fixed structure based wireless networks. MANET protocols have to face high challenges due to dynamically changing of topologies, low transmission power and asymmetric links. Due to link instability, node mobility and frequently changing topologies routing becomes one of the core issues in MANETs. Currently existent routing protocols provide routing solutions up to a certain level and most of them are designed and implemented in small areas. Many researchers are still working on the developments of MANET routing protocols. With the increase in the types of routing protocols used in mobile network it has become necessary to study the effectiveness of each type of protocols In this papper we compared between the most famous species (proactive, Reactive, hybrid) and choose a protocol to be representative of all species previously mentioned and the network performance assessment each type in terms of Throughput, dynamic routing routing, load, delay and determine which of these protocols appropriate for each case.
Mobile wireless networks consist of a set of cooperative and mobile nodes, each node can move randomly at a specific speed in all directions without any control of a central manager. This type of networks has become a hot research topic due to its military application and suitability for emergencies and natural disasters. Due to the lack of fixed infrastructure, the routing process becomes the major problem in this type of networks, where the responsibility of routing is transferred to each node. Over the last few years, a number of traditional routing protocols has been proposed, but these protocols do not support quality of service in different environments. Some studies have improved some of these protocols to support quality of service for specific environments. This research identifies and analysis some of these improved protocols.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا