Do you want to publish a course? Click here

موقف النّحاة من شواذّ التّصريف

588   1   586   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2014
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

No English abstract



References used
إصلاح المنطق ، لأبي يوسف يعقوب بن إسحاق بن السّكيت (ت 244 ه) ، تحقيق . أحمد محمد شاكر و عبد السلام هاروف ، دار المعارف ، القاهرة ، ط4
الإغفال لأبي علي الحسن بن عبد الغفار الفارسي (ت 377 ه)، تحقيق د. عبد الله بن عمر الحاج إبراهيم ، المجمع الثقافي ، أبو ظبي ، 2003م .
ديوان الراعي النميري (ت 91 ه) ، جمعه و قدّم له ناصر الحاني ، دمشق ، 1964م.
rate research

Read More

This study treated the position of the Mamluke state from the people of Keserwan and limiting it to the military campaigns that the Mamluke state waged against Keserwan Mountain at the ends of the seventh century H/the thirteenth century CE, which we re known historically by The Keserwan campaigns, and that by standing on their causes by showing the passings of the people of Keserwan and their positions from the state after its exposure to the Crusade invasion. As the three military Keserwan campaigns that the Mamluke state waged against the people of Keserwan with its different sects formed one of the most prominent episodes of the struggle in that geographical spot. This study revealed the several results and effects that those campaings left behind especially the political and demographic and denominational effects on the people of Keserwan. As the state could impose its prestige by force. This study aimed to show the position of the Shiekh ibn Taymia from the behaviours of the people of Keserwan and from their religious belief, with concentrating on his role in the 3rd campaign politically and militarily, and analyzing his letter to the Mamluke Sultan Al-Nasir Muhammad ibn Qalawun and its meanings, and observing its effects and gravity. As the Shiekh Taqiy Aldin ibn Taymia represented in the period of the first Mamluke age one of the most prominent scientists of the Sunna as he had an obvious role side by side with the political authority against its opponents. This study showed the development of this struggle and its revelations intellectually and theoretically by presenting opposite models representing it as Ibn Taymia and Ibn Al-Mutahir Al-Hilly. As the legal opinion of Ibn Taymia and his thought had the most effect in lighting the political and the intellectual struggle with them in the subsequent periods. The importance of this study became clear because of pure objective causes presented in its treatment of several centers and details by some neutrality far from partiality because of the tendencies and points of view that accompanied these campaigns which appeared in the historical writing based on the identity or sectarianism by some writers, which made the history of the campaigns on Keserwan in Lebanon a sectarian history as the whole relation with Mamluke state because of ignoring much of their aspects. As it is impossible in any case to burden the responsibility of the struggle with one of the two parties
The study addresses a number of legal issues related to the Syrian position on the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. First, it represents the legal basis of the Syria position with regard to the rules of the national law. The study also addresses a nu mber of issues and legal questions to the extent of compliance of this position with international law, and precidents related to the creation of former international tribunals. It also looks into the issue of consistency between the Syrian position and the special tribunal’s statute. It raises the question, based on legal documents issued by the tribunal, on countries’ obligations, including Syria, to future cooperation with the Tribunal on issues of opening investigations, extradition and the renunciation of jurisdiction. The study addresses the impact and legal consequences resulting from these issues through highlighting the tribunal’s position on these issues and questions.
''al-Quds'', The Palestenian cause especially has always Been the main interest of the Arab Poets for a long time .This interest has increased after the 1948 '' Nakbeh '' However, this cause hasn't been away from the interest of the Iranian poets a fter the victory of their revolution in 1979. By the leader of the Islamic revolution the pussing I mam Ayatollah Khomeini who set the last Friday of Ramadan as AL-Quads day to remind the whole world of the depression, hardship, torment and suffering the people of Palestine are exposed to .
يتناول بحثي موقف الإمام الغزالي من علم الكلام و أدلة المتكلمين، فقد اختلف العلماء في أهمية علم الكلام و حاجة الناس إليه، و كان الغزالي يرى أن هذا العلم ليس له إلا مهمة واحدة تتجلى في الرد على الشبهات و حفظ عقائد العوام، فعلم الكلام دواء لا غذاء و الد واء لا يحتاجه إلا المريض، كما تكلم عن ضرره و فائدته فقال بأن ضرره يتجلى في إثارة الشبهات و في تأكيد اعتقاد المبتدعة، فالهوى و التعصب و بغض الخصوم يستولي على قلب المتكلم و يمنعه من إدراك الحق أو التسليم له، و يتضمن مجادلة مذمومة كما يقوم على المشاغبة بالتعلق بمناقضات الفرق. أما منفعته فتظهر في نوع واحد و هو حراسة العقيدة على العوام و حفظها عن تشويشات المبتدعة بأنواع الجدل، فإن العامي ضعيف يستفزه جدل المبتدع و إن كان فاسداً و معارضة الفاسد بالفاسد تدفعه، لذلك نجد أنه على حكم على علم الكلام عدة أحكام مختلفة، فهو واجب كفائي، و حرام، و واجب عيني. فمرة يصرح بالتحريم لشدة ضرره على عوام الخلق و كثرة آفاته، و هو واجب عيني في حالة خاصة لشخص تمكنت البدعة منه و لم يستطع أن يزيلها و يعيد الطمأنينة لنفسه إلا بممارسة نوع من الكلام، و هو واجب كفائي لقمع المبتدعة و حراسة العقيدة و هي مهمة دفاعية لا يحتاج إليها سائر الخلق..
The research study was based on an important issue of Alakeda: the exploration of Almutazela’s standpoint of Allah’s attributes. This study was divided into: A preface, an introduction, and three issues. In the Introduction Chapter, the concept of Almutazela was defined. The first issue was related to the Ayats of the attributes and the standpoint of the Alsalaf and Almutazela. The second issue included the rationale provided by Almutazela and the response to it. The third issue involved samples of Almutazela’s and the reply to them by providing solid mental and transmission evidence. The key findings of the study are of particular importance to every Muslim. One of these key findings is that Almutazela’s perspective in relation to Allah’s attributes opposed Sahaba’s approach and their Tab’een as well as their followers because they wanted to separate the Creator from the saying of the representation and embodiment. As a result, they made a grave mistake represented by saying to hinder. Yet, they preferred the mind rather than the transmission (Quran) and regarded the mental evidence as the actual key. They interpreted the texts of the Holy Quran in an allegorical and metaphorical way with particular reference to Allah’s attributes. With regard to Alsuna, Almutazela ignored Alahad’s Ahadeeth in so many issues of Alakeda, including the Ahadeeth related to Allah’s qualities. Almutazela were skeptical of the tellers of Allah’s qualities, claiming that such qualities did not benefit certainty. Almutazela recognized the group Hadeeth but they put the mental evidence first. Therefore, they rejected several Hadeeths, such as those related to intercession and Allah’s vision and others. Consequently, Almutazela’s doctrine and Alakeda were severely criticized by providing mental and transmission (Quran) evidence throughout many years, especially by the scientists of Alsunha and Aljamaha. The main reason behind criticizing Almutazela is that they affected Aluma’s unity negatively in Alakeda. Thus, Almutazela’s thinking remained a major obstacle against the intellectual harmony in Alakeda. This is the abstract of the research study. This effort is made by the humble, asking Allah to make it useful and fruitful. God bless our work!.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا