The 3Dimension representation of facilities engineering an important stage in the
context of the expression of the engineering facilities and design engineering and
subsequent action to be carried out. From this point of our research is designed to
compare
the methods of digital representation triple dimension to civilian facilities with special
uses, including the archaeological monument for subsequent Business (documentation,
restoration) and ease of access to cross-sections. Technical and economic comparison was
conducted between three ways :
1. The traditional way using modern civil 3d programs and programs of digital
photography using mobile phone hardware and software approval.
2. Using the different potential of Geographic Information Systems, GIS software.
3. The possibility of using a Laser scanner
And adopted as a standard in the comparison the method that gives maximum of
economy to achieve the technical conditions.
The 3Dimension representation of facilities engineering an important stage in the
context of the expression of the engineering facilities and design engineering and
subsequent action to be carried out. From this point of our research is designed to
compare
the methods of digital representation triple dimension to civilian facilities with special
uses, including the archaeological monument for subsequent Business (documentation,
restoration) and ease of access to cross-sections. Technical and economic comparison was
conducted between three ways :
1. The traditional way using modern civil 3d programs and programs of digital
photography using mobile phone hardware and software approval.
2. Using the different potential of Geographic Information Systems, GIS software.
3. The possibility of using a Laser scanner
And adopted as a standard in the comparison the method that gives maximum of
economy to achieve the technical conditions.
In this paper, comparisons between several mathematical interpolation methods applied on high accuracy and huge laser clouds which only represents the DTM. In order to implicate the aforementioned, a group of a variety of Laser Scanned Areas has been
chosen to represent different types of terrain including complex and flat terrain, taking into account that man-made features are not involved in this study and that different Laser Clouds density is used to make the study more general.
A different set of algorithms were applied to conclude which one is more suitable. This step was followed by the comparison between different interpolation results. The results have shown that the Points'
Density has a great impact on a manner in which the optimal interpolation method is applied.
Moreover, it has proven that the Nearest Neighbor Algorithm is the best applied method compared with the other alternatives
