Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Difficulty of Annexation to Sentence and Proposed Solution to it
مشکلة الإضافة إلی الجملة و اقتراح لحّلها
953
0 60
0
(
0
)
Added by
Damascus University ورقة بحثية
Publication date
2009
fields
Arabic
and research's language is
العربية
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
لا شك أن الجر إحدی ميزات الاسم تميزه عن قسيميه الفعل و الحرف، و الجر يلحق الاسم بأحد عاملين هما: حرف الجر و الإضافة، و ينتج ذلك أن المضاف إليه يجب أن يکون اسما صريحاً حّتی يکون متمکناً من إعراب الجر أومؤولاً بالصريح کذلك. و لايمکن أن يکون المضاف إليه جملة إطلاقاً. و علی الرغم من ذلك نری النحويين خصصوا قسماً من باب الإضافة بالإضافة إلی الجملة، و ذکروا بعض ما يضاف إليها وجوباً و ما يضاف إليها جوازاً دون أن يأتوا بتعريف أو رسم يميزها عن الإضافة إلی المفرد، و دون أن يبيّنوا الإشکال اّلذي يخطر بالبال في هذه الإضافة، و نحن نسعی في هذا البحث إلی أن نکشف النقاب عن حقيقة الإضافة إلی الجملة حّتی تعرف أهي داخلة في مقولة الإضافة أم مقولة أخری من المقولات النحوية إن شاء الله تعالی.
Undoubtedly, the genitive is one of the noun signs which separates it from two other kinds of words: verb and letter. And the genitive joins the noun by one of the two agents-preposition particles and annxation. As a result’ the postfixed must be an explicit noun or a sentence that chenges to a noun by following one of the infinitival particles’ and the postfixed never could be a sentence. Never thelees, the Arabic syntactic allocated it a part of the anexation chapte. This has been done without any mention of the above mentioned difficulty.
References used
الأزهري، خالد، شرح التصريح علی التوضيح لابن هشام، ج 2، بيروت، دار الفکر، لاتا.
سيبويه، عمرو بن عثمان، کتاب سيبويه، نشر أدب الحوزة، 1404 ه
ابن فارس، أحمد بن زکريا، معجم مقاييس اللغة، ج 3، قم، مطبعة الإعلام الإسلامی، 1404 ه.
rate research
Read More
This research shows the concept of sentence syntax and the text
syntax and the difference between them, beside their respective
areas .It also tries to specify the obstacles which prevent the
progress of this kind of linguistic lesson in our Arabi
an collages
.Then it stops at the trends of linguistic studies where such kind of
linguistic lesson appears .Also tries to monitor the reality of this
lingual lesson in the Syrian collages through one sample ,that is Al
Baath University .Finally finishes by the most important
recommendations which can contribute in developing this kind of
lingual lesson .
Several studies have been carried out on revealing linguistic features captured by BERT. This is usually achieved by training a diagnostic classifier on the representations obtained from different layers of BERT. The subsequent classification accurac
y is then interpreted as the ability of the model in encoding the corresponding linguistic property. Despite providing insights, these studies have left out the potential role of token representations. In this paper, we provide a more in-depth analysis on the representation space of BERT in search for distinct and meaningful subspaces that can explain the reasons behind these probing results. Based on a set of probing tasks and with the help of attribution methods we show that BERT tends to encode meaningful knowledge in specific token representations (which are often ignored in standard classification setups), allowing the model to detect syntactic and semantic abnormalities, and to distinctively separate grammatical number and tense subspaces.
Recently, neural machine translation is widely used for its high translation accuracy, but it is also known to show poor performance at long sentence translation. Besides, this tendency appears prominently for low resource languages. We assume that t
hese problems are caused by long sentences being few in the train data. Therefore, we propose a data augmentation method for handling long sentences. Our method is simple; we only use given parallel corpora as train data and generate long sentences by concatenating two sentences. Based on our experiments, we confirm improvements in long sentence translation by proposed data augmentation despite the simplicity. Moreover, the proposed method improves translation quality more when combined with back-translation.
Grammarians have been different in parsing the sentence located
after Illa (except), as well as in the meaning of Illa itself, with which the
noun after it should be set up (marfoughah) on the beginning.
Some of these Arab grammarians have made it
set up (mansoubah)
on exception Illa, others denied that, and others too have not mentioned
the name of this sentence but refers only to it.
This paper discusses these various opinions explaining or
outweighing it in an attempt to find out the exact meaning of the sentence
among the parsed or unparsed sentences.
This paper describes a method for retrieving evidence and predicting the veracity of factual claims, on the FEVEROUS dataset. The evidence consists of both sentences and table cells. The proposed method is part of the FEVER shared task. It uses simil
arity scores between TF-IDF vectors to retrieve the textual evidence and similarity scores between dense vectors created by fine-tuned TaPaS models for tabular evidence retrieval. The evidence is passed through a dense neural network to produce a veracity label. The FEVEROUS score for the proposed system is 0.126.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
