هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى التقييم الشعاعي لفعالية الطعم الصنعي
™(Easy-Graft)المؤلف من [BCP+PLGA] في المحافظة على العظم السنخي بعد القلمع.تألفت العينة في هذه الدراسة من 30 حالة قلع أجريت عند 28 مريض (17 ذكور- 11 إناث), تم تقسيم العينة بطريقة عشوائية إلى مجموعتين:مجموعة الدراسة( 15 حالة) حيث تم تطبيق الطعم بعد القلع, والمجموعة الشاهدة ( 15 حالة) دون تطبيق طعم . تم إجراء صور ذروية من أجل المقارنة الشعاعية وذلك بعد القلع مباشرة وبعد 6 أشهر و 15 شهر من القلع لقياس مقدار النقص في ارتفاع السنخ. تم جمع البيانات باستخدام برنامج لتحليل الصور وتمت دراستها إحصائياً.وبنتيجة هذه الدراسة كان متوسط نقص ارتفاع السنخ في المجموعة الشاهدة(0.6 ملم) بعد القلع مباشرة و(2.4 ملم) بعد القلع ب 6 أشهر و( 3.3 ملم) بعد 15 شهر من القلع بينما كانت هذه القيمة الوسطية في مجموعة الطعم الصنعي(0.14,1.1,1.5 ملم) بعد القلع مباشرة وبعد 6 و15 شهر على الترتيب. وبالنتيجة كانت الفروق ذات دلالة إحصائية بين الأزمنة
المختلفة لكل مجموعة على حدا كما كان الفرق جوهرياً بين المجموعتين..وهىكذا يمكن اعتبار الطعم الصنعي™(Easy-Graft) طريقة فعالة في الحفاظ على العظم السنخي بعد قلع الأسنان.
This study aimed to radiographically assess the effectiveness of
the synthetic graft (Easy-Graft)™ which consists of [BCP+PLGA] in preservation of alveolar bone after teeth extraction. The sample consisted of thirty extraction cases in 28 patients (17males 11females) and was randomly divided into two groups; study group (15 cases) where the graft had been applied after extraction and the control group (15 cases). Periapical radiographs were taken immediately after extraction,and six and fifteen months later to measure the amount of bone height decrease. Data were collected by an image analysis software and statistically analyzed. As a result,
the mean bone height decrease in the control group was (0.6mm) after extraction, (2.4mm) after six months, and (3.3mm) 15 months later.Whereas it was (0.14,1.1,1.5mm) after extraction, 6months and 15months later respectively. As such, there were statistically significant differences between the different follow-up times.Thus, (Easy-Graft)™ considered an effective method for alveolar bone preservation after teeth
References used
TRUHLAR, RS; ORENSTEIN, IH; MORRIS, HF; OCHI S 1979- Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 38–45
GARG, AK 2001- Alveolar ridge preservation during and after surgical tooth removal. Dent Implantol Update;11:57-62
GRUBER, H; Ulm, CW; SOLAR,P; BLAHOUT R, MATEJKA M, WATZEK G 1993-Location of the mandibular canal within the atrophic mandible.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.Dec;31(6):370-5
CAWOOD ,JI; HOWELL RA 1988- A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 17: 232–236
BARTEE, B 2001-Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 1: Rationale and materials selection. Oral Implantol;27:187-193
socket preservation is a main therapeutic procedure to
prevent severe marginal bone resorption after tooth extraction.
Aim of this study: to investigate if there is any difference in the
amount of new bone formation 4 months after extraction and r
Assessment the changes in chin morphology after harvesting bone graft from
the symphysis using cephalometric radiographs.
This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between estrogen
depletion ,calcium-deficiency,and alveolar bone loss.
Alveolar bone loss was evaluated by radiographic and visual inspection of
rabbits with experimental lack of estrogen an
The reconstruction of the nasal ala requires the achievement of esthetic and functional results. Composite auricular grafts are extremely valuable here. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcome after using composite grafts for al
Dental caries increasingly affects the children nowadays. Statistics
concerning caries prevalence aim to guide and improve the
prevention of dental caries.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of
dental caries in the posterior primary teeth depending on the
presence of decay, missing due to caries or filling.