Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Proposal About the Rest Masses of Quarks
104
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Jiao Lin Xu
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
From the Dirac sea concept, we infer that a body center cubic quark lattice exists in the vacuum. Adapting the electron Dirac equation, we get a special quark Dirac equation. Using its low-energy approximation, we deduced the rest masses of the quarks: m(u)=930 Mev, m(d)=930 Mev, m(s)=1110 Mev, m(c)=2270 Mev and m(b)=5530 Mev. We predict new excited quarks d$_S$(1390), u$_C$(6490) and d$_b$(9950).
rate research
Read More
Using a three step quantization and phenomenological formulae, we can deduce the rest masses and intrinsic quantum numbers (I, S, C, B and Q) of quarks from only one unflavored elementary quark family $epsilon$ with S = C = B = 0 in the vacuum. Then using sum laws, we can deduce the rest masses and intrinsic quantum numbers of baryons and meson from the deduced quarks. The deduced quantum numbers match experimental results exactly. The deduced rest masses are consistent with experimental results. This paper predicts some new quarks [d_{s}(773), d_{s}(1933), u_{c}(6073), d_{b}(9333)], baryons [$Lambda_{c}$(6699), $Lambda_{b}$(9959)] and mesons [D(6231), B(9502)]. PACS: 12.60.-i; 12.39.-x; 14.65.-q; 14.20.-c Key word: beyond the standard model
Using phenomenological formulae, we can deduce the rest masses and intrinsic quantum numbers (I, S, C, B and Q) of quarks, baryons and mesons from only one unflavored elementary quark family. The deduced quantum numbers match experimental results exactly, and the deduced rest masses are 98.5% (or 97%) consistent with experimental results for baryons (or mesons). This paper predicts some quarks [d_{S}(773), d_{S}(1933) and u_{C}(6073)], baryons [$Lambda_{c}(6599)$, $Lambda_{b)(9959)$] and mesons [D(6231), B(9502)]. PACS: 12.39.-x; 14.65.-q; 14.20.-c. Keywords: phenomenological, beyond the standard model.
QCD Laplace sum-rules must satisfy a fundamental (Holder) inequality if they are to consistently represent an integrated hadronic cross-section. After subtraction of the pion-pole, the Laplace sum-rule of pion currents is shown to violate this fundamental inequality unless the up and down quark masses are sufficiently large, placing a lower bound on the 1.0 GeV MS-bar running masses.
Using phenomenological formulae, we deduce the masses and quantum numbers of the quarks from two elementary quarks ($epsilon_{u}$ and $epsilon_{d}$) first. Then using the sum laws and a binding energy formula, in terms of the qqq baryon model and SU(4), we deduce the masses and quantum numbers of the important baryons from the deduced quarks. At the same time, using the sum laws and a binding energy formula, in terms of the quark-antiquark bound state meson model, we deduce the masses and quantum numbers of the mesons from the deduced quarks. The deduced masses of the baryons and mesons are 98% consistent with experimental results. The deduced quantum numbers of the baryons and mesons match with the experimental results exactly. In fact this paper improves upon the Quark Model, making it more powerful and more reasonable. It predicts some baryonsalso. PACS: 12.39.-x; 14.65.-q; 14.20.-c keywords: phenomenology, elementary, quark, mass, SU(4), baryon, meson
We argue that it is possible to make a consistent picture of FNAL data including the production and decay of gluinos and squarks. The additional cross section is several pb, about the size of that for Standard Model (SM) top quark pair production. If the stop squark mass is small enough, about half of the top quarks decay to stop squarks, and the loss of SM top quark pair production rate is compensated by the supersymmetric processes. This behavior is consistent with the reported top quark decay rates in various modes and other aspects of the data, and suggests several other possible decay signatures. This picture can be tested easily with more data, perhaps even with the data in hand, and demonstrates the potential power of a hadron collider to determine supersymmetric parameters. It also has implications for the top mass measurement and the interpretation of the LEP $R_b$ excess.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
