Result in any State two commitments one respect for human rights
and the other counter-terrorism, the source of these commitments is
the international norms and conventions on the one hand and
constitutional texts on the other.
This research aims to show The extent of the protection afforded
by the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the
right to challenge the legality of detention, especially in light of
what Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
shows In this regard.
The modern concepts of human rights crystallized after the world war It (1939 – 1945).After
the war put its heavy load, the independent countries established the united Nations organization.
This organization issued its charter which became one of
the first documents of the
international human rights. The charter stated the promotion of respecting human rights and the
basic freedoms of all people without any discrimination because of gender, language or religion,
and no difference between men and women. And since the charter lacked a list which deals in
detail with the human rights, the united Nations issued the international announcement of the
human rights on 10th December, 1948, which included the main principles of civilian, political,
economic, social and cultural rights as well as individual freedoms.
The reinforcement of the role of the united nations in preserving human rights came through
the adoption of the international treaty of civil and political rights and the international treaty of
economic, social and cultural rights in the year 1966. Those treaties provided the cover and the
legal protection for a lot of rights which the international declaration of the human rights stated.
Since then, many other treaties adopted different cases such as the treatment of prisoners, the
situation of refugees, women rights and children rights.
The application of the rules of the international law can be specified on both the internal
national level and the international level through the work and the mutual effect from countries and
with the help of national and international procedures. It is necessary that this is done through
modifying these rules according to the national law that is applied in each country. The application
of the legal rule in the national law plays a crucial role in applying the international rule in the field
of human rights. In order to comply with the international criterion of human rights, it is necessary
for the Arab countries to ratify the basic agreements of human rights, taking into consideration the
peculiarity of the history of the development of each country. These purposes should help in the
activity of the international and social organizations of human rights.
In the last few years the world faced many political, economical, ideological and
military changes, leading to the emergence of a new international situation. These changes
had their effects on the international relations especially in the method o
f dealing with
different issues and problems. They also affected on applying the principles on which the
international law is based such as sovereignty, equality in sovereignty, the principles of
human rights and the principle of not interfering in the internal affairs of other countries.
On these bases a new international map is formed with the emergence of one political and
economical pole. As a consequence, the world has lost its strategic balance and the onepole
trend has dominated the international relations and has manifested itself in the
international decision-making and the current world issues. This, in turn, has compromised
the role of the United Nations and other international government and non-government
organizations that comprise the human rights organizations on the bases that what
happened in Iraq and happening in Libya are considered a human disaster in all measures.
Through the trespasses that the United States has committed, and still committing, by
jumping over the international legitimacy and the contradictions in the unrealistic
justifications for waging wars and military actions and the consequent violations of
internationally admitted human rights through international treaties, for all these, the
United States is considered part of most of them.
The article aims to critically analyze the development of individual applications
proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights, excluding friendly
settlement procedures.
This research shed light on the concept of human security and the new values it adds
to the current concepts in international law. It starts with identifying human security
and its elements and the main mechanism to achieve it, through what will be
presented of the work of publicists and international bodies. Then it proceeds to the
international changes that led to its appearance, and the criticisms that were
directed to this concepts, and the main international bodies that work in this field,
whether inside or out side the structure of the United Nations, to conclude with the
similarities and diffrences between human security one the first hand and human
rights and traditonal concepts of security on the other had.