Approved a Syrian legislator confidentiality of postal correspondence and
telecommunications protect the right constitutional and legal for a person,
expresses hereby expressly intention to protect his privacy and his secrets
expressing his though
ts and opinions, freedom of thinking, communication
and exchange of information, but this does not mean that the freedom of the
individual in this secret absolute, but are given by some of the restrictions that
allow eavesdropping and compromised in order to achieve justice and the
interests of society according to the decision of the Syrian legislature in the
Code of Criminal Procedure, as Syrian legislator intervened to devote their
protection sometimes in the face of ordinary people, or in the face of tempted
to disclosure of public officials at other times, but Syrian legislator omitted to
protect the means to contact an updated e-mail correspondence, which is
exposed through it for many attacks, which require effective protection
avoiding the legislative vacuum.
Considered studies and legal research - about crime
eavesdropping - a few to some extent, and are almost the
majority of the studies that were presented to eavesdrop as an
ingredient in other crime , a crime disclosure or publication , due
to the
absence of a legal regime for the crime of eavesdropping
on the dial in most legislation .
With the issuance of the Communications Act Syrian No. 18 of
2010 , it became necessary to talk about crime eavesdropping on
telephone communications , and will be presented the study to
determine the concept of tapping them and points of
differentiation between them and some of the terminology to
identify legal form her , and displays the search restrictions
contained on the individual's right to protect the privacy of his
intelligence telephone.
The search ends eavesdropping offense to be considered
independent , with the exceptions of public interest and the
security of society and the state.
