اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدThe energy cascade in grid-generated non-equilibrium decaying turbulence
142
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We investigate non-equilibrium turbulence where the non-dimensionalised dissipation coefficient $C_{varepsilon}$ scales as $C_{varepsilon} sim Re_{M}^{m}/Re_{ell}^{n}$ with $mapprox 1 approx n$ ($Re_M$ and $Re_{ell}$ are global/inlet and local Reynolds numbers respectively) by measuring the downstream evolution of the scale-by-scale energy transfer, dissipation, advection, production and transport in the lee of a square-mesh grid and compare with a region of equilibrium turbulence (i.e. where $C_{varepsilon}approx mathrm{constant}$). These are the main terms of the inhomogeneous, anisotropic version of the von K{a}rm{a}n-Howarth-Monin equation. It is shown in the grid-generated turbulence studied here that, even in the presence of non-negligible turbulence production and transport, production and transport are large-scale phenomena that do not contribute to the scale-by-scale balance for scales smaller than about a third of the integral-length scale, $ell$, and therefore do not affect the energy transfer to the small-scales. In both the non-equilibrium and the equilibrium decay regions, the peak of the scale-by-scale energy transfer scales as $(overline{u^2})^{3/2}/ell$ ($overline{u^2}$ is the variance of the longitudinal fluctuating velocity). In the non-equilibrium case this scaling implies an imbalance between the energy transfer to the small scales and the dissipation. This imbalance is reflected on the small-scale advection which becomes larger in proportion to the maximum energy transfer as the turbulence decays whereas it stays proportionally constant in the further downstream equilibrium region where $C_{varepsilon} approx mathrm{constant}$ even though $Re_{ell}$ is lower.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The previously reported non-equilibrium dissipation law is investigated in turbulent flows generated by various regular and fractal square grids. The flows are documented in terms of various turbulent profiles which reveal their differences. In spite
of significant inhomogeneity and anisotropy differences, the new non-equilibrium dissipation law is observed in all these flows. Various transverse and longitudinal integral scales are measured and used to define the dissipation coefficient $C_{varepsilon}$. It is found that the new non-equilibrium dissipation law is not an artefact of a particular choice of the integral scale and that the usual equilibrium dissipation law can actually coexist with the non-equilibrium law in different regions of the same flow.
We use two related non-stationarity functions as measures of the degree of scale-by-scale non-equilibrium in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The values of these functions indicate significant non-equilibrium at the upper end of the inertial range.
Wind tunnel data confirm Lundgrens (2002, 2003) prediction that the two-point separation $r$ where the second and third order structure functions are closest to their Kolmogorov scalings is proportional to the Taylor length scale $lambda$, and that both structure functions increasingly distance themselves from their Kolmogorov equilibrium form as $r$ increases away from $lambda$ throughout the inertial range. With the upper end of the inertial range in non-equilibrium irrespective of Reynolds number, it is not possible to justify the Taylor-Kolmogorov turbulence dissipation scaling on the basis of Kolmogorov equilibrium.
We present results from an ensemble of 50 runs of two-dimensional hydrodynamic turbulence with spatial resolution of 2048^2 grid points, and from an ensemble of 10 runs with 4096^2 grid points. All runs in each ensemble have random initial conditions
with same initial integral scale, energy, enstrophy, and Reynolds number. When both ensemble- and time-averaged, inverse energy cascade behavior is observed, even in the absence of external mechanical forcing: the energy spectrum at scales larger than the characteristic scale of the flow follows a k^(-5/3) law, with negative flux, together with a k^(-3) law at smaller scales, and a positive flux of enstrophy. The source of energy for this behavior comes from the modal energy around the energy containing scale at t=0. The results shed some light into connections between decaying and forced turbulence, and into recent controversies in experimental studies of two-dimensional and magnetohydrodynamic turbulent flows.
The conventional approach to the turbulent energy cascade, based on Richardson-Kolmogorov phenomenology, ignores the topology of emerging vortices, which is related to the helicity of the turbulent flow. It is generally believed that helicity can pla
y a significant role in turbulent systems, e.g., supporting the generation of large-scale magnetic fields, but its impact on the energy cascade to small scales has never been observed. We suggest for the first time a generalized phenomenology for isotropic turbulence with an arbitrary spectral distribution of the helicity. We discuss various scenarios of direct turbulent cascades with new helicity effect, which can be interpreted as a hindering of the spectral energy transfer. Therefore the energy is accumulated and redistributed so that the efficiency of non-linear interactions will be sufficient to provide a constant energy flux. We confirm our phenomenology by high Reynolds number numerical simulations based on a shell model of helical turbulence. The energy in our model is injected at a certain large scale only, whereas the source of helicity is distributed over all scales. In particular, we found that the helical bottleneck effect can appear in the inertial interval of the energy spectrum.
The 4/5-law of turbulence, which characterizes the energy cascade from large to small-sized eddies at high Reynolds numbers in classical fluids, is verified experimentally in a superfluid 4He wind tunnel, operated down to 1.56 K and up to R_lambda ~
1640. The result is corroborated by high-resolution simulations of Landau-Tiszas two-fluid model down to 1.15 K, corresponding to a residual normal fluid concentration below 3 % but with a lower Reynolds number of order R_lambda ~ 100. Although the Karman-Howarth equation (including a viscous term) is not valid emph{a priori} in a superfluid, it is found that it provides an empirical description of the deviation from the ideal 4/5-law at small scales and allows us to identify an effective viscosity for the superfluid, whose value matches the kinematic viscosity of the normal fluid regardless of its concentration.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
